gradschoolfail

9 ms·

61.
by gradschoolfail 2y ago
Without using greek or latin: models where e&m charges dont alter the curvature of space are close approximations to the real thing. Contemporary physicists call this a “constant coupling” https://physics.stackexchange.com&#x
62.
by gradschoolfail 2y ago
There was a decent 1 para summary oh phySE lets see if i can find it Edit: riff on your riff, timely reminder (to self) to attend to Thom’s catastrophe theory and its environs
63.
by gradschoolfail 2y ago
Sorry, not sufficiently erudite to parse PoWaBu renominative only? Zombified PCs overcame (thermidorian/stalinist) reaction? (cf Lannes, reading like a serial founder story, compare Villeneuve, reading like a serial bigcorp CxO) Yes, A
64.
by gradschoolfail 2y ago
Most impt itswise problem of our preneoceramic age is [how to sell] radiative cooling.. Unfortunately, being not on the convex hull (pareto front) of the funders (now or ever? But thanks Stanford for trying!) (that is, not amenable to dual
65.
by gradschoolfail 2y ago
Your score for Great souled foxes, great souled lions, great souled foxes with lion skin, great souled lions with fox-skins? Mongoose (“RL” examples allowed) ?) [subsequente exercise would be applying scoring to Philodemus’ (note: fully cos
66.
by gradschoolfail 2y ago
To the 1st q: comments > upvotes indicated that it was generating drama, pending judicial review (it’s a reasonably nonGoodhartian measure, impervious even to meta from the likes of we) Fwiw i really like the top comment (also related to
67.
by gradschoolfail 2y ago
shall we call this “cavalier-mode”? Bernadotte due to his ties, and most of the other marshalls due to other ties, couldnt enjoy the spoils of war, but Lasalle?
68.
by gradschoolfail 2y ago
What you may be getting right might yet underlie some resolution of at least a couple of the Hn’s :) Lets just say, compressing an obscene tonnage of number theoretical hndwav’ry folks usually prefer one direction of SR <=> QM.., so w
69.
by gradschoolfail 2y ago
Sorry, waiting for w.a.o to debug themselves, using it as an us-heirs-approved (or rather judgement-mostly-withheld) pro-bono to the su-heirs-approved alternative (which has a largely orthogonal feature set) It does smell like there is some
70.
by gradschoolfail 2y ago
Uhh for that you might have to bundle up something together with the Greene pilgrimage.. dont think he published his axioms anywhere [but you could also invite one of his students to a meal..] Update: the review that set me on that future t
71.
by gradschoolfail 2y ago
Right, i’d forgotten about that other thread, going back to that im a couple days (need to continue ramping up spare bw)
72.
by gradschoolfail 2y ago
Exciting, i.e. might even play with this soonish
73.
by gradschoolfail 2y ago
Wrust? (O_3), more properly tungstic
74.
by gradschoolfail 2y ago
)) (* rare stratagems, but i think you already caught that ) Not sure i caught the sclera drift (esp since post covid) denta coverage [by undies] might be … more decisive.. in “california” (circa 1993) e.g. Kevin Eastman (in 2009) vs Shredd
75.
by gradschoolfail 2y ago
Can you make your (proposed?) patch (to DS, presumably?) even more explicit?* [ok, y is “seconds” peeking out from the other “si unit”] To me, it makes more sense to say (<- what you said) string (representing expression) to expressi
76.
by gradschoolfail 2y ago
Update: TIC: TK-monad HK-dyad (>power<>sex<) Debreviated: Today I Compared
77.
by gradschoolfail 2y ago
Ah thanks for the metaflooding!. was trying to achieve a balance between the 2, kinda like “Number theory might be the future of physics, but fluid dynamics is the future of number theory”* I concede to a weakness for triangles, such as thi
78.
by gradschoolfail 2y ago
Oops by “Faraday” i meant “Franklin” cofather of the french revolution, not the anglo revolution.. (Wuz thinking how the revolutionary structures (i.e. artillery stds?) were mostly already in place for decades before NB) Q: how did these no
79.
by gradschoolfail 2y ago
Pardon my laziness, link to Koerner? Orphand theorems (and strategems) also deserve not to be culled (by obscurity, mostly) for the latest, refer back to the public goods taxonomy?
80.
by gradschoolfail 2y ago
I’d seen situations where companies were forced to debug FOSS that caused problems in their proprietary setups.. that counts as persuasion, I presume?
81.
by gradschoolfail 2y ago
Compressible is the usual case, no? Non-negligible timescales are fine in my book.. (probably in yours too, if you believe that turning a low trust society into a high trust society one is possible, by injecting a something or other) Length
82.
by gradschoolfail 2y ago
Nice way of depicting the dilemma (or trilemma). I dont see any straightforward way to resolve it rn.. maybe more thinking about which should work better in what situations.. it does seem to depend on timescales. (There was a comment in the
83.
by gradschoolfail 2y ago
May the gods of equanimity forgive my snarky intrusion.. if a bit-hacker gets into a fight [bitva] with a it-hacker, i’m ever only going to side with the it-hacker (even if the elite ex-it-hacker bit-hacker has a history of lauding (/l
84.
by gradschoolfail 2y ago
Hmm, the analysis with respect to FOSS could also interesting. might make less sense to consider profit/compensation. Might be more useful to think of responsibility flows.. (or sources as well as sinks)
85.
by gradschoolfail 2y ago
>it helps to have the relevant individual buy in How about having a single post buy-in ? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41891694 It may be that im being hypernormal and you’re being weird here* It may be that while
86.
by gradschoolfail 2y ago
Laters, after i get some shuteye, for the counterriffs, RN to report a TIL before i forget: Botai horses a different subspecies.. In fact, an improvement over pshrimp: Pcheval!
87.
by gradschoolfail 2y ago
https://archive.is/VsnSZ The idea that groups of pple are at least as wise/responsible as individuals, a hidden axiom of e.g. YC/cali(/cultural descendants of project-manhattanites), Or, e.g. 14th amendment,
88.
by gradschoolfail 2y ago
Late 1980s/Early 1990s? (My mother related the same experience then) I’m increasing my weights for the idea that silicon-based computers will turn out to be the biggest self-pwn in the history of mankind*.. i know Kubrick was probably
89.
by gradschoolfail 2y ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40434871 Case officer, the informant is gone to the other side.. (Elysian range?) L: 山羊の歌 > 坂になる! (‘Become a slope!’)
90.
by gradschoolfail 2y ago
+1 for contact with americans (E.g. Julia Ormond) (1998)

More ›