3 ms·
What you may be getting right might yet underlie some resolution of at least a couple of the Hn’s :) Lets just say, compressing an obscene tonnage of number th
by gradschoolfail 2y ago
What you may be getting right might yet underlie some resolution of at least a couple of the Hn’s :)
Lets just say, compressing an obscene tonnage of number theoretical hndwav’ry folks usually prefer one direction of SR <=> QM.., so whatever is “extra” in GR maps to the “extra” bits (sorry) in QFT (that JvN had almost no inkling of, that Feynman had just a wee bit (sorry))
[looking at the arxiv 16xx review again, it does seem that Gisin had the right motivations in 199x, but git mostly distracted (not sure about students).. i’d have thought that “heterodyne detection” wouldve set you off]
- 082349872349872 2y agoindeed! sorry, I'd been looking for a better entry into Gisin that might suit my limited (I have MTW, but have not yet worked through it, and my QM knowledge is also at an SR-level — when reading RPF's pop QED lectures I could see integrating e^ix terms instead of his little arrows, but that's about it) background, so I hadn't yet peeked into 16xx vintage Gisin. SAHD reminds me of http://blog.sigfpe.com/2005/05/dual-photography-part-i.html http://blog.sigfpe.com/2005/05/dual-photography-part-i.html (in part-ii the experiment was indeed successful, but that seems to have been lost to the mists of the web, at least while wayback is down?)
- gradschoolfail 2y agoThere was a decent 1 para summary oh phySE lets see if i can find it Edit: riff on your riff, timely reminder (to self) to attend to Thom’s catastrophe theory and its environs