3 ms·
Sorry, waiting for w.a.o to debug themselves, using it as an us-heirs-approved (or rather judgement-mostly-withheld) pro-bono to the su-heirs-approved alternati
by gradschoolfail 2y ago
Sorry, waiting for w.a.o to debug themselves, using it as an us-heirs-approved (or rather judgement-mostly-withheld) pro-bono to the su-heirs-approved alternative (which has a largely orthogonal feature set)
It does smell like there is something here*, but judging by your scleras (shall we say, sclera-pupillary boundaries) we should focus on the GR-QM convo, just a tad more..
(Where tad = some kind of dot product with this convo)
(*the (non)associativity)
- 082349872349872 2y agoPercival: Arithmetical properties of strongly chaotic motion ? TIL Scwhinger was on the Bonaparte counter-clockual programme... Any chance you could sketch to me why SM works with SR but not GR? Curvature? [squinting hard enough, is the Wick Theorem related to how algebraically, given pairs (2-things, and hence rel'ns) one automatically gets all finite n-things?] [another squint: separated at birth: space-ordered vs normal-ordered, and all the sign gymnastics* in computer graphics geometry, where re-ordering matters and vertices are connected by digons of two half-edges?] is there anything related to the notion that one might have a bunch of geodesic paths connecting events, but that we might apply creation and annihilation to these as well, so fewer geodesics would lead to positive curvatures and more to negative? * what I like about my algebraic CS model is that I often skim systems papers, and think, "oh, this is just exploiting this particular instance of distributivity..."