3 ms·

Most impt itswise problem of our preneoceramic age is [how to sell] radiative cooling.. Unfortunately, being not on the convex hull (pareto front) of the funde

Most impt itswise problem of our preneoceramic age is [how to sell] radiative cooling.. Unfortunately, being not on the convex hull (pareto front) of the funders (now or ever? But thanks Stanford for trying!) (that is, not amenable to dual usage..?)..

082349872349872 2y ago
Yeah, I guess orbit (better yet: points further out on the ITN*?) must be pretty much like being in a giant Dewar... * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interplanetary_Transport_Network#Further_explanation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interplanetary_Transport_Netwo... Lagniappe: https://i.sstatic.net/YDcKQ.jpg https://i.sstatic.net/YDcKQ.jpg
- gradschoolfail 2y ago
  Without using greek or latin: models where e&m charges dont alter the curvature of space are close approximations to the real thing. Contemporary physicists call this a “constant coupling” https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/3901/what-is-a-good-mathematical-description-of-the-non-renormalizability-of-gravity#3908 https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/3901/what-is-a-g... This is not true for the strong force, but you wont get nonsense either if you zoom out far enough (coarse graining, right). [So “perturbation theory works for SM”, but saying gravity is “non-renormalizable” gives the impression that Manuel Bronstein didnt already anticipate this before he was purged.] mtw have a mnemonic “space tells matter how to move, matter tells space how to curve”. you arent allowed take short cut as in em “charges tell charges how to move”. Indeed (already true in SR) the fields themselves have mass, so short cuts blow up your face.. Otoh, if you try to take the proper path (integral) you run into the issue of nobody knowing how. Roughly, you need the intrinsic curvature for the integral but you need the integral for the intrinsic curvature.. See Dyson equation, no lucky initial guesses, 3+1d 2010.10500 Yep Percival knew what was up, but even at the phySE page above “algorithmic compression” was spoken. Gisin you linked had “Kolmogorov complexity”, no delvings?
  - 082349872349872 2y ago
    poor (bedniy?) MPB's neighbourhood would eventually gentrify: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ugivNRYfjc&t=214s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ugivNRYfjc&t=214s If one avoids the uv catastrophe by substituting a fixpoint, are there ever multiple possibilities? (in computer semantics we sometimes have entire lattices of fixpoints from which to choose)
    - gradschoolfail 2y ago
      there are other fixed points, but they are too benign to get attention. (Ir). and manifolds.

082349872349872 2y ago

Yeah, I guess orbit (better yet: points further out on the ITN*?) must be pretty much like being in a giant Dewar... * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interplanetary_Transport_Network#Further_explanation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interplanetary_Transport_Netwo... Lagniappe: https://i.sstatic.net/YDcKQ.jpg https://i.sstatic.net/YDcKQ.jpg

gradschoolfail 2y ago
Without using greek or latin: models where e&m charges dont alter the curvature of space are close approximations to the real thing. Contemporary physicists call this a “constant coupling” https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/3901/what-is-a-good-mathematical-description-of-the-non-renormalizability-of-gravity#3908 https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/3901/what-is-a-g... This is not true for the strong force, but you wont get nonsense either if you zoom out far enough (coarse graining, right). [So “perturbation theory works for SM”, but saying gravity is “non-renormalizable” gives the impression that Manuel Bronstein didnt already anticipate this before he was purged.] mtw have a mnemonic “space tells matter how to move, matter tells space how to curve”. you arent allowed take short cut as in em “charges tell charges how to move”. Indeed (already true in SR) the fields themselves have mass, so short cuts blow up your face.. Otoh, if you try to take the proper path (integral) you run into the issue of nobody knowing how. Roughly, you need the intrinsic curvature for the integral but you need the integral for the intrinsic curvature.. See Dyson equation, no lucky initial guesses, 3+1d 2010.10500 Yep Percival knew what was up, but even at the phySE page above “algorithmic compression” was spoken. Gisin you linked had “Kolmogorov complexity”, no delvings?
- 082349872349872 2y ago
  poor (bedniy?) MPB's neighbourhood would eventually gentrify: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ugivNRYfjc&t=214s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ugivNRYfjc&t=214s If one avoids the uv catastrophe by substituting a fixpoint, are there ever multiple possibilities? (in computer semantics we sometimes have entire lattices of fixpoints from which to choose)
  - gradschoolfail 2y ago
    there are other fixed points, but they are too benign to get attention. (Ir). and manifolds.