gradschoolfail

6 ms·

31.
by gradschoolfail 2y ago
Hmm, no pro-logicians interested yet? Is it because logic is such a gradual domain.. would it move you beyond knowing just the name* to note that i’ve been involved with … experiments?? (Im a fan of <<Experimental Mathematics>>
32.
by gradschoolfail 2y ago
Meanwhile: Nietzsche has been castigated as the master of casual contempt https://archive.is/Fg5Hi
33.
by gradschoolfail 2y ago
Meanwhile.. TIGR: Heinlein (inadvertently, via the old man of USMC?) channelled FdG! “> Come on you apes! Do you wanta live forever? ” (Seems to me everyone we cited above were fully or almost fully vulpine? Bringing us back to the Wiela
34.
by gradschoolfail 2y ago
“Cardboard”: looked in vain for the uncountable singular of “boxes” (/“categories”) Also: “cardboard” as a metaphor for the inevitable reduction in dimensions (here, of “personalities”) Banach: if you mean the eponymous space, yes, are
35.
by gradschoolfail 2y ago
Re:cruelty/VPS/offering struggle Not sure if the sage is allowed cruelty(=irreversibilty?<= deluging), more sure that the sage is forbidden from enjoying it (or even signalling its enjoyment, cf Not-Hillel)
36.
by gradschoolfail 2y ago
When frustrated by this eternal verity, I remember the lesson of Gutei’s finger (a koan from Mumonkan) https://thedewdrop.org/2018/12/28/guteis-finger/
37.
by gradschoolfail 2y ago
My current take is that culture is just path-dependent[0] interpretations of pretty much the same situation [1] [0]large mean time between scattering events, e.g. number and make-up of parties dont change very much since the last time the c
38.
by gradschoolfail 2y ago
Pardon my ongoing lack of attention— pray tell what number base?
39.
by gradschoolfail 2y ago
Haha i remember! friends got caught up in that! (Wasnt it 3-sigma tho?) Theorists would also love for experimentalists to be wrong, but the most efficient way to do it would be by inventing new maths… [sad but still fun]
40.
by gradschoolfail 2y ago
Amen. Hopefully this wont stop me from trying to classify PG as lion or fox or mongoose .. (i cant remember what it was anyways… fox with lion skin?) [“Why do I have a reason for keeping people in cardboard. Because it’s there” — Not George
41.
by gradschoolfail 2y ago
Oops: Krivine => Girard
42.
by gradschoolfail 2y ago
Time for PG to, with chainsaw & pernach, remind Patrick about founder mode?
43.
by gradschoolfail 2y ago
2 things (in addition to your above VPS) that i urgently need to pay attention to [im procrastinating! Thanks to lizard brain survivalism? Was deluged by the not-meh HN graviton thread; i dont even know if any logician (what about Krivine&#
44.
by gradschoolfail 2y ago
If you’re young (or if you’re old but your mind remains flexible) i urge you to think hard about this problem.. i do and i will! my mind is already quite inflexible so i’m not going say anything definite about this question out of fear of s
45.
by gradschoolfail 2y ago
REDIT(s) I ought to get overly emotional (in a bittersweet way) about all this, and i almost did, but Teddy reminded me to stay ataraxic (i.e. keeping his role in formulating key management policies purely in the cortex ) thank you for that
46.
by gradschoolfail 2y ago
[Righhht, maybe you can excite me even more by relating this to quantales?? Or maybe expand on fns vs distributions a bit more?] L: quantal (quasiparticles)
47.
by gradschoolfail 2y ago
This needs to be emphasized more, by the TFA too — most (theoretical) physicists think that detecting gravitons is an engineering exercise that has no implications* for quantum gravity (as understood by the public) >The model of non-self
48.
by gradschoolfail 2y ago
there are other fixed points, but they are too benign to get attention. (Ir). and manifolds.
49.
by gradschoolfail 2y ago
Hmmm, so its closer to what you intended to mean when you said “distributions are prefunctions? Im still confused.. didnt msn publish w springer? [1] in Deckung gehen?
50.
by gradschoolfail 2y ago
https://archive.is/ycvZb The median ranking is very similar, but on mobile now (hence the shortened url)..
51.
by gradschoolfail 2y ago
By some economic measures (e.g. median income corrected PPP) NY state is also very close to Switzerland. Otoh, wyoming has always been way ahead..
52.
by gradschoolfail 2y ago
If you dont find his humor grating (I do, but YMMV — its hard to hit the sweet spot as Mr. Levine does) Scott Aaronson might be the ML of quantum computing. (i also find the field slow, but i really think im the odd one out!)
53.
by gradschoolfail 2y ago
Wait i thought functions are predistributions.. [My bad, it was Matvei, not Manuel, no idea how i mixed that up.. Checkout his childrens books, as well as https://archive.is/eaYRs Note how the independent diagonals are what
54.
by gradschoolfail 2y ago
Borodin might have kept Cordwainer at arms length ( or hardly ever fraternized with SYS except thru Eugene. (Purely from psychoanalysis) Have you checked with the Lords of Instrumentality? (Did 101 speak with the equivalent of a midwestern
55.
by gradschoolfail 2y ago
ISO docs seem to me to be one of those club antigoods.. paying for them doesnt necessarily make them less destructive (dependent on timescales tho, i do believe that standards are an unalloyed good if they are patched with a timeconstant lo
56.
by gradschoolfail 2y ago
Sufficiently “advanced”* program synthesis is indistinguishable from compiler optimization? *(= “correct”?) [sufficiently constrained madness is indistinguishable from ikigai?]
57.
by gradschoolfail 2y ago
Hmmm im still a bit distracted. Whats MSN? How far is your idea of refinement from some def of “derivative”?
58.
by gradschoolfail 2y ago
Thanks! Much to mull over! Concede that im most sympathetic to leonine foxes (post-philodemus-patch though?). “Effective” leaders, in my book, have to give the people (先-後-不） what they want emotionally, and yet go against their will rather
59.
by gradschoolfail 2y ago
Hmmm no mention of “chattel” often “a chattel” Edit: in comments, but nobody mentions it can be countable
60.
by gradschoolfail 2y ago
Ok i need to read that. Without context 不知不覺 => old man Nakayama sneering at children

More ›