4 ms·
Sufficiently “advanced”* program synthesis is indistinguishable from compiler optimization? *(= “correct”?) [sufficiently constrained madness is indistinguish
by gradschoolfail 2y ago
Sufficiently “advanced”* program synthesis is indistinguishable from compiler optimization?
*(= “correct”?)
[sufficiently constrained madness is indistinguishable from ikigai?]
- 082349872349872 2y agoI haven't reached 70, so maybe we should see if 画狂老人, who did (although not 110) ever mentioned ikigai?
- gradschoolfail 2y agoPardon my ongoing lack of attention— pray tell what number base?
- 082349872349872 2y agoin qua talibus Indorum fruimur bis quinque figuris: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1363084/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1363084/ (our own convention; the fox has Hox, and the lion too, but they'd probably count in octal. For those keeping score, compare The House of Asterion: "The original says fourteen, but there is ample reason to infer that, as used by Asterion, this numeral stands for infinite") Lagniappe: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TiXINuf5nbI#t=120s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TiXINuf5nbI#t=120s EDIT: while we're at it, maybe I should specify units as orbits of Sol III?