freejazz

30 ms·

661.
by freejazz 1y ago
Any particular chapter in this issue of Arcana?
662.
by freejazz 1y ago
Reread my post.
663.
by freejazz 1y ago
> LLM's probably won't get significantly better without this data. Yeah and Facebook couldn't scale without ignoring the harms it causes people. Should we just let that be? Society seems to think so but I don't think
664.
by freejazz 1y ago
It's not alleged that they stole the content. They told the courts they pirated the materials.
665.
by freejazz 1y ago
It's a constant theme with these internet companies. Oh Facebook is too big to police child predation on their platform? Am I supposed to be sorry about that? Whose fault could it be besides Facebook? They built it, the people came. Im
666.
by freejazz 1y ago
The problem isn't the fraud, the problem is that they do not pay enough staff to deal with it which leads to legitimate accounts getting closed out and people not being able to do anything about it. Money seized, etc.
667.
by freejazz 1y ago
Once again, not the proposition that was being offered. It's not that he's better. It was claimed he has a spine and it was pointed out that he doesn't. It's not a comment on if Apple is good or not. It's not a comm
668.
by freejazz 1y ago
Seems like you are having a different conversation: "it would be nice if someone had a backbone and fought Apple like Epic's Tim Sweeney."
669.
by freejazz 1y ago
Yeah, I could also cut off my hand in order to resolve an itch on it. End goal met!
670.
by freejazz 1y ago
Hah
671.
by freejazz 1y ago
>The reason why people can't be bothered to get formal training is that modern philosophy doesn't seem that useful. But rationalism is?
672.
by freejazz 1y ago
Insane to call "more people bad" naive but then actually try and account for what would otherwise best be described as hope.
673.
by freejazz 1y ago
Not all warnings are equal. Are you a negligence or products liability attorney? You think that a warning that is easily ignored and moved past to do the same thing anyway is sufficient to obviate liability? I don't think the law agree
674.
by freejazz 1y ago
>Continuing to focus on me does nothing to substantiate your position. Lol, it's not my position. It's the law. They were held liable. You kept making the focus on yourself, bringing yourself up for no reason, and then even mor
675.
by freejazz 1y ago
>This is childish and does nothing for the discussion. It's not about me. I'm not claiming to be an authority, nor am I using myself as one. If it's not about you why did you reference yourself as an authority twice? Calli
676.
by freejazz 1y ago
> Appeals to myself? ... > I'm pretty neurotic about vehicle safety Like, I'm not making it up. So no need to pretend to be daft about it. You each time referred to yourself as someone particularly capable of rendering a re
677.
by freejazz 1y ago
Why?
678.
by freejazz 1y ago
Why would they be changing this page? Nothing about the constitution has changed.
679.
by freejazz 1y ago
Don't a considerable group of people think the rapture is right around the corner? https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2022/12/08/about-fou...
680.
by freejazz 1y ago
Well if Jan 6th wasn't it...
681.
by freejazz 1y ago
I think it's a pretty meaningful distinction but perhaps I'm in the minority there. I certainly don't care to be 100% right on the internet about everything.
682.
by freejazz 1y ago
> No need to attack me. I'm not attacking you, it's a direct response to your frequent appeals to yourself as some sort of authority for reason and sensibility in this discussion, when your responses clearly indicate that you a
683.
by freejazz 1y ago
>What part of how autopilot is marketed do you find to be gross negligence? The fact that it's not an autopilot is a great start. >I would ask, what is the existing definition of autopilot as defined by the FAA? Who is responsibl
684.
by freejazz 1y ago
And you don't respond to your own point about it being called autopilot despite it not being an autopilot >> If you repeatedly ignore the inattentive driver warnings, Autosteer will be disengaged for that trip. If you receive sev
685.
by freejazz 1y ago
Appeal of what and on what grounds? Are you an attorney or are you just making this up?
686.
by freejazz 1y ago
> but it seems that Tesla is subject to unfair treatment here given the amount of warnings you have to completely ignore and take no responsibility for. Lol is this for real? No amount of warnings can waive away their gross negligence. A
687.
by freejazz 1y ago
How do you go and correct someone to say that it was a civil suit and then call the judgment a fine???
688.
by freejazz 1y ago
So? Tesla needs to bear the responsibilities of having deleted its own potentially exculpatory evidence. Not granted an inference that it did so and therefore Tesla is innocent.
689.
by freejazz 1y ago
They actually do. Might be less people than before, but plenty still do. I live in a moderately cool neighborhood in Brooklyn. It's crazy Thursday through Saturday. Bars, parties, everyone everywhere, parks full. Baseball, run crews, v
690.
by freejazz 1y ago
Jeez!

More ›