>Continuing to focus on me does nothing to substantiate your position. Lol, it's not my position. It's the law. They were held liable. You kept making the focu

>Continuing to focus on me does nothing to substantiate your position. Lol, it's not my position. It's the law. They were held liable. You kept making the focus on yourself, bringing yourself up for no reason, and then even more perplexingly, denying that you did it. >Multiple automakers are making similar marketing claims as Tesla as their level 2 classified technology improves. Tesla is not even remotely alone in any of this. They're just ahead. Meanwhile FTC has done nothing on this front for a decade. I haven't seen that and no one seems to be close to what Tesla outright implies with "autopilot". >Is a decade not long enough to take action? What's acceptable in your opinion? The fact that regulators should take action is not incongruous with the fact that Tesla is reckless and negligent. Both can be true. No one forced Tesla to do anything so no one else is responsible for their behavior. >Everyone that cares about autonomous vehicle safety and thinks Tesla is not doing enough to protect drivers. You'll find plenty of lawyers stating that tort law is the only way to settle ADAS cases right now. Jeez. I guess it's everyone else's fault but Tesla's when it's clear that everyone else thinks Tesla is behaving poorly. >Dunk on Tesla all you want, but that's not going do anything to further road safety. Yawn. This comment thread isn't doing anything to "further road safety" how obnoxious of you.