freejazz

4 ms·

1.
by freejazz 6d ago
It's not me with the monolithic view, that's for sure.
2.
by freejazz 7d ago
>They're not only useful for programming, it's just that programming is by itself a trillion dollar a year industry. This, by itself, is sufficient to not be the scam you assert it to be. Yeah, if you think I'm being overl
3.
by freejazz 8d ago
So it'd just be copyright again? Fascinating.
4.
by freejazz 8d ago
>You're the one who called it a trillion dollar scam. Don't pretend like the AI companies are saying its only useful for programming. You've been arguing against that the entire time.
5.
by freejazz 8d ago
>Even before then, I looked at the maths puzzles they were doing well at, and I found I did not understand the questions let alone the answers. okay, and? >Even before then, the free trials of Claude Code and Codex at the end of last
6.
by freejazz 8d ago
Went from AI replacing my job as an attorney, to them begging me to use their tools
7.
by freejazz 8d ago
Year 3 of being told my job will be replaced by AI, and the only thing that's happened so far is that AI vendors keep showing up to my office, begging me to pay them to use it is a tool. If you're only seeing the charts go up - yo
8.
by freejazz 9d ago
Wouldn't surprise me, seems to be the case for many of the users here as well.
9.
by freejazz 9d ago
I don't see tanks killing pedestrians every week or so in NYC
10.
by freejazz 9d ago
Yeah, the guy running a trillion dollar scam is totally the exception to CEO-ism
11.
by freejazz 9d ago
> At least Sam and Dario are aligned with a value set that is understood and clear I find this ironic as it's regularly pointed out here that they operate in the exact opposite way.
12.
by freejazz 9d ago
> Anyone can help clarify why it is seen as a win? Because the EFF is generally not very pro-copyright and certainly, at a minimum, hates the DMCA. >I don't really buy the “small developers will be sued by large corporation for y
13.
by freejazz 9d ago
I think right here you're demonstrating that judgment doesn't come easily
14.
by freejazz 9d ago
Yeah, it's not like there's any literature about Chess in the corpus of these models!
15.
by freejazz 9d ago
> You look at science fiction and say "why didn't I get flying cars" I definitely don't, and you're definitely not getting my point, but I'm amused that you've instead double down on somehow getting it
16.
by freejazz 10d ago
You're making my point for me, surprised you don't realize that...
17.
by freejazz 10d ago
More show and less tell would be appreciated.
18.
by freejazz 10d ago
And what since then?
19.
by freejazz 10d ago
I don't think the poster disagrees with you at all. The middle ground is that there are no breakout products and that the models clearly aren't so powerful as to make these companies not produce shit code.
20.
by freejazz 10d ago
Really? It was being sold as a total replacement for jobs like software engineering and being an attorney, but its looking a lot more that its just going to be a tool those professions use and doesn't actually seem to be taking jobs
21.
by freejazz 10d ago
No one has spent the past three years telling me that a 6 year old will take my job!!!
22.
by freejazz 10d ago
>Are there reams of chess moves that the model can train off of? No. For real??
23.
by freejazz 10d ago
> It is useless to have smart rings do the primary stuff of what a smart watch does Is it? I don't really like wearing watches and certainly have no interest in a smart watch. It's also deductible from my HSA whereas personal s
24.
by freejazz 10d ago
How would you know if you never tested your intuition against the metrics?
25.
by freejazz 10d ago
Yeah, I found its made me much more aware of and focused on eating early, getting to sleep early, staying on a consistent sleep schedule, etc.
26.
by freejazz 10d ago
I like my oura ring but I find its terrible for fitness tracking. It takes nowhere near enough readings to actually get an idea of what zones my heart rate is in. I have a Wahoo Tickr that I use when I cycle or play tennis and the differenc
27.
by freejazz 11d ago
>Not for operating profit. Training is a one-time cost that gets amortized across every query. But people are saying its not part of the calculation to generate the cost of a query... >And either way, the training of new base models w
28.
by freejazz 12d ago
If my company sells widgets and dongles, capex for the dongle line does not figure into widget COGS
29.
by freejazz 12d ago
Unfortunately, just stating that something is reasonable does not make it true.
30.
by freejazz 12d ago
Isn't training necessary for the end-product? How is it not a cost to generate the output if you can't generate the output without having done the training? Seems more like saying that a car is profitable product when you don&#x27

More ›