freejazz

24 ms·

691.
by freejazz 1y ago
Do you have any reason to actually support this kind of otherwise completely specious argument? Yeah, sure, limiting some things that are not good can make a good result. Where's the leap from that to the medical research that's b
692.
by freejazz 1y ago
Obtuse and naive.
693.
by freejazz 1y ago
Lol by what metric? I don't know when this ridiculous thing started where the world was somehow objectively divided based upon things you agree or disagree with. But it's constantly offered as argumentation: "oh you don&#x2
694.
by freejazz 1y ago
> fill out a form, wait, see a nurse, tell them what I wrote on the form, wait some more, see a doctor and tell them what I wrote on the form lol, the entire computer industry is based on me entering my email address twice in a row...
695.
by freejazz 1y ago
> It seems to imply that OpenAI/Anthropic are less manually biased than the people accusing them of wokeness presumed. Duh. When is that ever not the case?
696.
by freejazz 1y ago
Thank you for explaining.
697.
by freejazz 1y ago
I don't disagree it did. But... does it do? Will it does? Was mostly being silly. But for sure there's a grain of truth as to the feeling. I don't think it's wrong to have a love hate relationship. And sure, maybe I&#x27
698.
by freejazz 1y ago
>I don't personally have any problems with the CIA's literal spying and intelligence operations. That's magnanimous of you. >We can have the fake-mustache guys without the extralegal murder-for-hire and using-computers-
699.
by freejazz 1y ago
The head side of the coin comes with the tail side of the coin.
700.
by freejazz 1y ago
When you say spun out, you mean that congress created another agency, right?
701.
by freejazz 1y ago
> reasonable reason Just a guess that it lies packed somewhere in your use of the word "reasonable"
702.
by freejazz 1y ago
I find it incredibly weird that people stroll into a conversation like this, basically flexing the complete lack of civic knowledge they have.
703.
by freejazz 1y ago
Good riddance Internet, you did not really make anything better.
704.
by freejazz 1y ago
> about as much water as an average golf course in two weeks. That's a lot of water, no?
705.
by freejazz 1y ago
People are building plenty here. The poster said building was being prevented. That's not the case.
706.
by freejazz 1y ago
> prevented building more for decades What planet do people live on? Go to any neighborhood in NYC and you are going to see tons of construction.
707.
by freejazz 1y ago
>I am not sure why you would think your single anecdote is defensible or evidence to prove much. Evidence? Prove? What are you talking about. This is just a discussion between people, not some courtroom melodrama you are making it out to
708.
by freejazz 1y ago
You didn't. You said the peak hit in 2002. Presumably something happened that caused the trend to start in 2003, which could obviously not be the fact that eventually in 2025 it would be more convenient to instead stream movies at home
709.
by freejazz 1y ago
I didn't say there was, but what do you think changed that year that they went down? It's your assertion, not mine...
710.
by freejazz 1y ago
No, my question is why did it start going down in 2003 for the reasons you cited, which seem to be contemporary
711.
by freejazz 1y ago
What's the difference? You called them cowboys? Pretended like companies wouldn't actually sell poison?
712.
by freejazz 1y ago
It was Vincent. > I feel like big VC money goes to solving legal analysis, but I'm seeing a lot of wins with document drafting/templating. What do you mean "wins?" Like motions won with AI drafted papers? I'm ske
713.
by freejazz 1y ago
>so cowboys meet Darwin and their population drops. I'm not sure why you think "let people poison others for profit, their customers will die" is a good argument.
714.
by freejazz 1y ago
What on earth??
715.
by freejazz 1y ago
Okay, what happened in 2003 then?
716.
by freejazz 1y ago
Case law for the proposition that the company has a fiduciary duty to its shareholders? Here's a top google result for you: https://online.hbs.edu/blog/post/fiduciary-duty-to-investors
717.
by freejazz 1y ago
>Feels nothing like the same. The .com bubble was largely companies with no business, unchanged revenue but still having massive swings in price in private and public markets. I'm an attorney that got pitched the leading legal AI se
718.
by freejazz 1y ago
Yeah, the difference between the "something there" and the $4b valuation is the bubble.
719.
by freejazz 1y ago
It can be true that not every function of the FDA works as intended, while it still does provide functions that are crucial to American society and are being removed.
720.
by freejazz 1y ago
It's not and that's bullshit from RFK.

More ›