boringuser2

9 ms·

61.
by boringuser2 3y ago
Python isn't a serious language for programmers. It's for non-programmers.
62.
by boringuser2 3y ago
How about making a static website that doesn't require extensive hosting lest it crash for a few thousands of visitors? Serving static blog content should be trivial if your code isn't absolute lunacy.
63.
by boringuser2 3y ago
This is the obvious issue. It's reasonable to assume that kids whom are bullied have socially undesirable qualities vis-a-vis kids who are not bullied. Kids with socially undesirable qualities are obviously more likely to become adults
64.
by boringuser2 3y ago
"Maximality" is neither implied nor required. All that is required is sufficient intellectual superiority to man, which is extremely feasible. It's just for our understanding that we'd call such a being god. That's
65.
by boringuser2 3y ago
Rather than waiting for god-machines, you could just believe in god. Not specifically any religion, just god. Or god-entity. Or god-force. Basically, deus ex machina except for philosophy It's a surprisingly strong position. Respects o
66.
by boringuser2 3y ago
Good post, I basically agree - hence the current policy Israel and America have cooked up of isolation and embargo. Regarding ethnic cleansing, while you speculate, the Gazans suffer under it in reality. I'd give Iran the implicit mora
67.
by boringuser2 3y ago
>having a different opinion is "aggravating" Why did you post this when it is clearly non-productive at best and an obvious terms violation?
68.
by boringuser2 3y ago
Iran has started no wars in recent memory, killed no civilians, etc. Iran has, nevertheless, been the constant target of Israel attempting to drag the USA into a cataclysmic war. What world do you live in?
69.
by boringuser2 3y ago
Israel is a larger threat to Iran than Iran is to Israel, I think that's relatively obvious and can't really be argued.
70.
by boringuser2 3y ago
I believe that whether or not Iran would erase Israel from the Middle East, which they probably would, along with a certainty than Israel not only would erase Iran from the Middle East, but has been actively trying to get the US to do s
71.
by boringuser2 3y ago
I wouldn't put much stock in the strategic implications of these publicized papers outside of the strategic implications being that they want you to think China is a discernible threat. It's similar to the Israel/Iran thing w
72.
by boringuser2 3y ago
The thing is, TSMC floundered in America because they had to compensate American workers. American workers aren't cheap. These brutal Asian work cultures can only exist in Asia. Americans and Europeans compete through ingenuity and int
73.
by boringuser2 3y ago
1. Japan is a vassal state of the US. 2. Japan has a different work and compensation culture than European countries. 3. China is no discernible threat to Japan.
74.
by boringuser2 3y ago
One of the major reasons why I don't use or recommend NextDNS is because they force you to use their DNS resolver when a DNS resolver like Quad9 has vastly superior threat intelligence.
75.
by boringuser2 3y ago
I know this sounds odd: but why not prescribe those individuals non-virilizing anabolic steroids for recuperation? Worst case scenario, you have some lipid imbalance, possibly liver enzyme increase and natural testosterone suppression at th
76.
by boringuser2 3y ago
It's not unexpected that it is biased to the language of its creators. I'd expect similar results from Chinese AI, etc. The question is it reasonable for English speakers with a generally European heritage to be the stewards of ni
77.
by boringuser2 3y ago
You'd think the race as politics people would get tired of generating these strange contradictions that they must formulate increasingly elaborate explanations for, but it's a fun little evergreen enterprise I suppose.
78.
by boringuser2 3y ago
Some colonizer needs to teach the person who wrote this the importance of stating a clear thesis and backing it up with facts. Halfway through the article it still seemed like a random hodge-podge of disconnected anecdata about a niche lang
79.
by boringuser2 3y ago
That's a stronger definition, but it's still weak because it isn't primary source material. This guy isn't a disinterested political historian. Imagine taking as definition the views of Giovanni Gentile on Marxism. I wou
80.
by boringuser2 3y ago
That's definitely not even close to reality. National Socialism and Italian Fascism were all about the strong taking responsibility for the nation, in a philosophical sense. These were social welfare states that provided for the "
81.
by boringuser2 3y ago
Kind of. There is a lot of money in lobbying for certain things. Companies generally don't want political outcomes per se via lobbying outside of their own niche interests. Much more impactful are dedicated lobby groups. For exmaple, t
82.
by boringuser2 3y ago
I've managed to mostly mitigate this problem using a ruckus r710, which competes expertly for air space. Saturates fully. 2.4ghz is still too crowded in urban environments, but every smart device on it has enough bandwidth to function.
83.
by boringuser2 3y ago
We're going to have to agree to disagree. The US has done terrible things in the too-recent future in the explicit name of making the world a better place. At least, that rationale triggers my gag reflex.
84.
by boringuser2 3y ago
>Most people have probably experienced the frustration of weak Wi-Fi signals. Even getting a network to cover every corner of a fairly modest house can be a challenge That's... not why your AP signal is weak. It's because of la
85.
by boringuser2 3y ago
You're going to entrust making the world a better place to... the US government?
86.
by boringuser2 3y ago
>fascist This word is wild. Very interesting. It basically means "evil bad guy".
87.
by boringuser2 3y ago
I think you're misunderstanding slightly the utility function of the logical device here. It's not so much that we cannot analyze a complex system using this criterion, it's moreso a tool that allows us to identify a logicall
88.
by boringuser2 3y ago
It is the lens to apply to any system. You don't defend a tenuous conclusion by doubling down with a tenuous defense. "Science" is constantly inaccurate. I can pull two papers right now with opposing conclusions. Assuming a s
89.
by boringuser2 3y ago
That might be true, but I don't think this makes the conclusion any more compelling because it now fails Occam's razor. Chances are greater the conclusion is simply incorrect.
90.
by boringuser2 3y ago
I actually don't believe this conclusion based off the fact that it would be slam-dunk evidence for the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's, which we don't have.

More ›