batuhanicoz

4 ms·

1.
by batuhanicoz 6mo ago
Neither of them require a browser. We run whatsmeow inside iOS and Android apps, with no browser whatsoever.
2.
by batuhanicoz 6mo ago
The way I would put it as someone who works at Beeper is: only use messaging automations for personal use, and don't use it to spam anyone or do anything you wouldn't do yourself within the app. As long as you don't abuse and
3.
by batuhanicoz 6mo ago
Peter is also the creator of PSPDFKit, and people have considered him an incredible engineer way before transformers were even invented.
4.
by batuhanicoz 6mo ago
whatsmeow is built and maintained by Beeper's bridge architect, Tulir Asokan, and is used by many Beeper users every day with no issues. It's at the core of our WhatsApp bridge: https://github.com/mautrix/what
5.
EmDash Feedback(ma.tt)
41 points by batuhanicoz 6mo ago|6 comments
6.
by batuhanicoz 1y ago
For any user that was with us before today, it's free!
7.
by batuhanicoz 1y ago
This is an overreaction. It's violence. Trying to justify it by claiming it's part of their culture is not healthy, I think we can have some universal values (don't stab people?) and it is perfectly reasonable to force people
8.
by batuhanicoz 2y ago
WordPress.org is not Automattic’s platform (there is a lot of managerial overlap and both are ultimately controlled by the same person). Our well documented issues with WP Engine does not change the fact Automattic has been one of THE open
9.
by batuhanicoz 2y ago
Beeper (Automattic) | Remote | Full-time | Reverse Engineer | $70-$170k and great benefits Beeper unifies all your chats across networks in one app. We are looking for people to join our incredible team of reverse engineers that build our i
10.
by batuhanicoz 2y ago
The initial release of SCF only applied security fixes, changed the plugin name and removed upsells. I don't think there is any change that might cause the issue you are having. If you can share the problem you are experiencing on Maki
11.
by batuhanicoz 2y ago
Our attempts at resolving trademark issues with WPE predate our discovery of the attribution removal.
12.
by batuhanicoz 2y ago
If you point to any lies told by me, I would love to correct them. No one has told me to come here and defend anyone. I work at a part of Automattic that is isolated from anything WordPress — I don’t have to be here. I am defending values I
13.
by batuhanicoz 2y ago
ACF isn’t a premium plugin (linked post only concerns those). The linked post also might not reflect the current policies. This update was a security update and was done due to the unique circumstances around the original publisher.
14.
by batuhanicoz 2y ago
As I understand it, WordPress Foundation's board can revoke the license if Automattic is no longer a good custodian of the brand. It makes sure even if Automattic is no longer in good hands, the Foundation can protect the WordPress bra
15.
by batuhanicoz 2y ago
> If wp.org is part of the foundation It is not. > a8c is intentionally obfuscating their ownership of wp.org Automattic (my employer) does not own WordPress.org There is no obligation on WordPress.org's part to provide free serv
16.
by batuhanicoz 2y ago
Thank you for bringing this to our attention. I asked people who are helping with the infra of WordPress.org and they are not sure why Singlehop is showing "The Wordpress Foundation" for those IPs. They belong to the hosting provi
17.
by batuhanicoz 2y ago
Publicly, perhaps but we've been trying to resolve these issues with WP Engine for at least 18 months now.
18.
by batuhanicoz 2y ago
Most of my other comments I was speaking in first person, in others I did not initially realize it wasn't as clear in some of them. I also updated my bio here to reflect the product I am working for belongs to Automattic. Previously, i
19.
by batuhanicoz 2y ago
I am an employee of Automattic, that's correct and public. The problem is not the "WP" in their name but their specific usage of "WordPress" and "WooCommerce" on their website and marketing. You don't
20.
by batuhanicoz 2y ago
If WP Engine wanted to dedicate resources to build on the code they are using, they would've contributed more to the core itself. Instead of forking, they could channel their resources to give back and that would be a good step to reso
21.
by batuhanicoz 2y ago
Using WordPress the software is totally free, in both senses of the word. Using the WordPress and WooCommerce trademarks outside of fair use is not. Disclaimer: I work at Automattic.
22.
by batuhanicoz 2y ago
WordPress.com started out as a WordPressµ (WordPress Multi User) provider. Just a place for people to quickly start their own blogs, mainly hosted on a WordPress.com subdomain. To learn more about WordPress MU: https://codex.word
23.
by batuhanicoz 2y ago
Projects page of the Foundation ( https://wordpressfoundation.org/projects/ ) does not say those projects belong to the Foundation. It states: > Matt Mullenweg, the director of the WordPress Foundation, has been direc
24.
by batuhanicoz 2y ago
As long as competitors of Automattic does not infringe on the trademarks owned (in the case of WooCommerce) or licensed (WordPress) by Automattic, I don't see any reason for us taking any action. I would personally ask everyone to at l
25.
by batuhanicoz 2y ago
I work at Automattic, owner of WordPress.com. I asked how WordPress.org is funded and will get details on that but I can tell you WordPress.org is not part of the foundation. Open source project and the WordPress trademark are owned the Wor
26.
by batuhanicoz 2y ago
> are all of those services provided by WordPress.org without funding from WordPress foundation? As far as I am aware, this is correct.
27.
by batuhanicoz 2y ago
WordPress.org is operated by Matt Mullenweg as a free service that hosts plugins, themes, docs and more. It does not take donations, or as far I am aware, make any profits. Instead, people are encouraged to donate to the Foundation, which h
28.
by batuhanicoz 2y ago
Infra, services and trademarks. They are not part of the GPL license. Everyone is welcomed to use any GPL code as they see fit, as long as they are within their limits as outlined in the license. But this does not mean W.ORG has to keep pro
29.
by batuhanicoz 2y ago
WordPress has been around for a long time, and there is no change to how open it is. It is GPL code, Automattic is not forking it and selling access to the fork. We are just asking WP Engine to contribute back to the project that they are b
30.
by batuhanicoz 2y ago
Hiding the widgets isn't the main issue. If you infringe the WordPress trademark in commercial use, and ignore any attempt to make it right, and pursue legal action, W.ORG does not have to provide those free services to you. I'm g

More ›