Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
aydyn
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
16 ms
·
271.
▲
by
aydyn
1y ago
Or you dont read the book at all and ask the llm to give you the salient points?
272.
▲
by
aydyn
1y ago
I dont think there is any confusion about that. How would "excreting fat" even work?
273.
▲
by
aydyn
1y ago
There's no fix other than a technological one. Modifying the collective behavior of 8 billion people is just not going to happen.
274.
▲
by
aydyn
1y ago
> what you meant when you said "realistic", right? No, apparently I must clarify that I meant "realistic" when I said "realistic". > even stronger ideology and biases is even less of a convincing argument
275.
▲
by
aydyn
1y ago
> reasonable Thats not the adjective I used. > 2 people who tell you the same thing An appeal to the authority of two people with the same ideology and biases is not a convincing argument. > That said, the incivility started when y
276.
▲
by
aydyn
1y ago
Maybe if you get angry some more?
277.
▲
by
aydyn
1y ago
> If anything, "the vast majority of people" find mass deportation of millions of citizens and noncitizens to gulags, conflict zones, etc, to be even more unreasonable than doing nothing. Please don't cut off my quotes mid
278.
▲
by
aydyn
1y ago
> "The vast majority of people" find mass deportation The majority of Americans agree with mass deportation even if they don't agree with exactly how ICE is proceeding. There's lots of room for discussion which obviou
279.
▲
by
aydyn
1y ago
Oh I'm sorry, I thought we already devolved into fully uncivil conversation? > Check your carbon monoxide detector.
280.
▲
by
aydyn
1y ago
I stand corrected.
281.
▲
by
aydyn
1y ago
> Some employees can be replaced by AI. Yes, but not lets pretend that there aren't a lot of middle and even upper management that couldn't also be replaced by AI. Of course they won't be because they are the ones making t
282.
▲
by
aydyn
1y ago
Okay, but then its not so much a definition. It's more like a test.
283.
▲
by
aydyn
1y ago
I think your definition is flawed. Take the Artificial out of AGI. What is GI, and do the majority of humans have it? If so, then why is your definition of AGI far stricter than the definition of Human GI?
284.
▲
by
aydyn
1y ago
That root post made a very civil request: what are realistic alternatives to mass deportation? Let's recap what kind of responses were made: * "It's your job to come up with an alternative" (not helpful) * "Just let
285.
▲
by
aydyn
1y ago
If you cheat in a game, you'll get VAC banned but still retain access offline.
286.
▲
by
aydyn
1y ago
If Steam itself goes bankrupt, Gabe himself said you'll still retain access to your games.1 Yes its a non-legally binding promise, but Steam has earned that trust. Also Steam isn't going away, so for these reasons that is "ho
287.
▲
by
aydyn
1y ago
Everything except for steam, one of the few to do it right. Of course they arent perfect as nobody is, but in general they treat developers right, they treat customers right. Theres no personalized surge prices or other AI BS, and they dont
288.
▲
by
aydyn
1y ago
no need I know what those things mean.
289.
▲
by
aydyn
1y ago
"Deport people I disagree with" is not a post worth engaging with seriously. You couldnt get one exchange deep, so Im not too worried.
290.
▲
by
aydyn
1y ago
You complaining about a post being snide lol funny how that doesnt apply to an obvious bad faith argument like "deport people I disagree with".
291.
▲
by
aydyn
1y ago
> We could end all illegal immigration in an instant wdym
292.
▲
by
aydyn
1y ago
Oh yes words have meaning, some people can understand them.
293.
▲
by
aydyn
1y ago
> Did you notice how you went from “solution” to “outcome” and then back to “solution”? Thats perhaps a bad habit of mine, finding synonyms as I dont like to repeat the same word in the next sentence. > Indeed, they asked for “a good
294.
▲
by
aydyn
1y ago
You dont recognize your very own words?
295.
▲
by
aydyn
1y ago
You don't get to decide what constitutes "American interests." [sic]
296.
▲
by
aydyn
1y ago
I think this conversation is very clearly people speaking past each other. Let's reset. They are asking for a solution that is realistic. Something that is happening right now is, by definition, a realistic outcome. "Let everyone
297.
▲
by
aydyn
1y ago
Do you really think its a winning argument to say that, actually, its conservatives wanting more illegal immigration? Bizarre.
298.
▲
by
aydyn
1y ago
> The reason the immigration situation doesn't get better is because republicans need it to be broken. I try to keep an open mind but its very hard to take the debate seriously when you end with disingenuous points like this.
299.
▲
by
aydyn
1y ago
It kind of sounds like you need to offer a solution not him. Because his side did come up with a solution and are implementing it.
300.
▲
by
aydyn
1y ago
Unions are not effective when there's such a surplus of labor and people willing to break lines. It wont work in today's tech labor market.
More ›