_hypx

70 ms·

421.
by _hypx 3y ago
My tone is consistent because the people I'm talking to are fucking stupid and repeat the same lies over and over again. This is from your previous post: > In 2022, over $240 billion was invested in more than 680 global hydrogen pro
422.
by _hypx 3y ago
For underground salt domes and caverns? Leaks and damaged vessels are a non-issue. Salt caverns are everywhere. In fact this is how we store natural gas today. And the capacity is truly insane. It is on the order of PWhs: https:/&#x
423.
by _hypx 3y ago
You do realize that hydrogen storage is also already known? The boring method of storing hydrogen in underground salt domes and caverns is well understood. This is all way more practical than crisscrossing the oceans with HVDC lines. And it
424.
by _hypx 3y ago
You need look into the mirror here. Why are you like this? Do you understand what exponent growth even is? At 50% YOY growth, it will catch up to everything else in a handful of years. And this is your source, not mine. You are basicall
425.
by _hypx 3y ago
Largely because there was no need, or the experience was much worse. This is starting to change.
426.
by _hypx 3y ago
It's moves like these that will create the alternative to Reddit. It was this style of anti-consumer moves that killed Digg. History is repeating itself.
427.
by _hypx 3y ago
A global power grid is a far greater fantasy than building hydrogen storage, just FYI.
428.
by _hypx 3y ago
You’re using a gish gallop style list of random claims. There is not one science article that pushes back on every one of your points. The main thing to note is that fuel cell cars already exist . They already are cars that can be bought n
429.
by _hypx 3y ago
Your rhetoric is utterly non-sincere. The idea that something needs to be greater than $100B, something very few things are, to be significant is utter bullshit. Not even getting into the part about 50% YOY growth.
430.
by _hypx 3y ago
I'm curious as to how you can read an article describing tens of billions of dollars of investments that have reached the final investment stage, and that it is growing 50% YOY, and then conclude that this is the same level of success
431.
by _hypx 3y ago
So you're literally predicting the end of the world. Great.
432.
by _hypx 3y ago
Silicon Valley has been hiding a dirty secret for years: Many companies, if not the majority of them, are badly mismanaged. This is really going to be the start of the next big shift in who will be the leaders in tech. Many companies that a
433.
by _hypx 3y ago
You can just google it. Or bing it or whatever, since Google sucks these days. It's happening everywhere now. Like I said, this is akin to someone demanding proof that there's war in Ukraine right now.
434.
by _hypx 3y ago
The "proposal" is simply pointing out that those claims are simply false. Hydrogen storage is a solved problem. BEV fanatics are just lying about it. In reality, the whole thing is a disruptive technology to BEVs since it fundamen
435.
by _hypx 3y ago
The list is basically the news: https://www.google.com/search?q=green+hydrogen&tbm=nws&sa=X&... The facts are so far into the realm of "it's already happening now" that what you're asking is
436.
by _hypx 3y ago
The political reality of Germany is still that of climate change denial. Worse, environmentalists are effectively part of that group. Eventually, this will change. You cannot denial reality forever, and especially not of existential problem
437.
by _hypx 3y ago
The reference is literally google news search: https://www.google.com/search?q=green+hydrogen&tbm=nws&sa=X&... You'll get hundreds if not thousands of references.
438.
by _hypx 3y ago
Do you seriously want me to list all of the hundreds of different projects all going up right now? There are a huge range of figures too, and not everything is announced in detail yet. FYI, the figures are well into the hundreds of billions
439.
by _hypx 3y ago
Again, you are simply unaware of what is happening. It is very similar to how anti-solar analysts simply failed to recognize the widespread deployment of PV panels around a decade ago.
440.
by _hypx 3y ago
Which are entirely troll arguments. Chernobyl is the worst case scenario imaginable and not possible with any Western designed reactor. Fukushima killed zero people for all practical purposes. Not to mention the lack of earthquakes in Germa
441.
by _hypx 3y ago
It is coming online as we speak. You are just not aware of it. This mirrors the early days of wind and solar power.
442.
by _hypx 3y ago
You can buy this right now: https://www.h2networks.com.au/lavo-hydrogen-battery/ But of course, given the enormous anti-hydrogen campaign of the last decade, everything is currently at an immature level.
443.
by _hypx 3y ago
It's already "too late" for any such solution. We are already at the point where geoengineering is necessary. But of course, environmentalists oppose that too.
444.
by _hypx 3y ago
This problem can be solved by making hydrogen. So there is a way to power society with renewables if you are willing accept the need for baseload power. Of course, renewable energy fanatics do not accept this fact, and often are ideological
445.
by _hypx 3y ago
Hydrogen is the best path regardless of whether you accept nuclear or renewable. In fact, it is the only path, as nothing else will delivery anything like zero emissions. People forget about industrial emissions entirely and how this full
446.
by _hypx 3y ago
And the vast majority of electricity is made from fossil fuels too. And that figure was far higher when BEVs got started. This is simply a lazy troll argument, and literally a repeat of old anti-BEV arguments.
447.
by _hypx 3y ago
And it is just a repeat of diesel cars taking off in sales when BEVs where just getting started. Again, more BEV propaganda and more promotion of unsustainably dumb ideas. A completely waste of time and ultimate missing the point: It is abo
448.
by _hypx 3y ago
The problem ultimately isn't about renewables vs. nuclear, it is that countries like Germany tore down their nuclear power plants and replaced them with coal power plants . If we had just old right-wing men as the opponents, then ther
449.
by _hypx 3y ago
That's pure BEV propaganda. It is pure gibberish. In reality, hydrogen is guaranteed to win this. BEVs are unsustainable and the whole conversation is based on the delusion of people who have invested too much on that side. Imagine acc
450.
by _hypx 3y ago
The solution is to switch to hydrogen cars and avoid all resource intensive materials. Not to mention that LFP comes with major compromises and most US Teslas do not use them.

More ›