3 ms·
My tone is consistent because the people I'm talking to are fucking stupid and repeat the same lies over and over again. This is from your previous post: > In
by _hypx 3y ago
My tone is consistent because the people I'm talking to are fucking stupid and repeat the same lies over and over again.
This is from your previous post:
> In 2022, over $240 billion was invested in more than 680 global hydrogen projects, marking a 50 per cent increase in investments compared to the previous year.
Hence 50% YOY growth.
And if you understand exponential growth, you'd know that this is extremely fast and it can quickly catch up to whatever target you're dreaming of.
That is about one country's policy. And it was literally announced days ago, meaning that this is a regular occurrence globally. You are intentionally missing the point I was making. Like I said, this is a major current event and guys like you are demanding proof of a massive global event that everyone should be aware of.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- ben_w 3y ago"was from a news story that did not correctly quote its own linked source document" (imagine a blink tag, I am) And was for one specific year. So in addition to "being false" and "you were so busy being angry you didn't bother to read", it's not even a reasonable claim to be exponential. Normally I wouldn't mind rolling with that as a hope for what might come, but you're being everything you're accusing everyone else here of being. > That is about one country's policy Policy? That actually makes it worse, because it implies Japan will not meet more than 1% of its demand that way. > Like I said, this is a major current event and guys like you are demanding proof of a massive global event that everyone should be aware of. Which in total is next to nothing: 1% over 15 years, if everyone matches Japan's proposal. And everyone else was telling you to actually dig up a link. Getting the link from you was like blood from a stone.
- _hypx 3y agoJust so you're aware, you never gave a link to your source. I am just going off your quotes. And YOY means year-over-year, so if it's 50% over last year, then it's 50% YOY. You can interpretate that as exponential growth unless you are expecting growth to stall. I don't see anywhere in that article that suggests this is just 1% of Japan's energy need. It should be a very significant portion. Again, this is a major current event. You expect people to be aware of it, or can do the most basic of googling. A lot of people here apparently either are profoundly ignorant or totally in denial that it is happening.