Rohansi

21 ms·

601.
by Rohansi 1y ago
In a theoretical future The Algorithm would include content generation so that the platform can generate content for you instead of just suggesting it. Could apply to TikTok, Spotify, etc. if the generated content is good enough.
602.
by Rohansi 1y ago
This does not stop every company from RTO mandates. My wife's employer is approaching full RTO and literally none of her team would go to the same office as her. And she was remote before COVID.
603.
by Rohansi 1y ago
> Give them an option to RTO or take a pay cut. How much of a pay cut? They could (and probably do) claim that WFH employees are not doing anything so they are worthless.
604.
by Rohansi 1y ago
I don't see the issue with this as long as the parents would still be putting the same time/effort into their work. It would just be split up.
605.
by Rohansi 1y ago
Doesn't mean games are going to abandon realistic graphics styles. I also believe Gabe Newell was referring more to gameplay mimicking real life rather than art style. Makes a lot more sense when you remember that the Half Life games h
606.
by Rohansi 1y ago
Most likely similar. What would the correct behavior be for the scheduler to avoid hitting it in the future? Flag the process as needing X instruction set extension so they only run on the high performance cores?
607.
by Rohansi 1y ago
Sure, but not always. Future games will have more detailed assets which will require more memory. Running at 4K or higher resolution will be more common which also requires more memory.
608.
by Rohansi 1y ago
Sounds great for performance.
609.
by Rohansi 1y ago
> PS5 has something like 16GB unified RAM, and no game is going to really push much beyond that in VRAM use That's pretty funny considering that PC games are moving more towards 32GB RAM and 8GB+ VRAM. The next generation of console
610.
by Rohansi 1y ago
That is your CPU temperature, not ambient (room) temperature.
611.
by Rohansi 1y ago
It's to reduce the risk of preeclampsia.
612.
by Rohansi 1y ago
Maybe? I don't remember the cases but there is some confusion with autopilot (cruise control) vs. FSD sometimes. Autopilot is a completely different system and nobody should be surprised if it leads to crashes when misused.
613.
by Rohansi 1y ago
I honestly think Tesla is past the point where lidar would provide significant benefits. I've tried FSD for a month or two and it can see everything but just drives like an idiot. Lidar isn't going to help it merge properly, chang
614.
by Rohansi 1y ago
The front camera Tesla is using is very good with this. You can drive with the sun shining directly into it and it will still detect everything 99% of the time, at least with my older model 3. Way better than me stuck looking at the pavemen
615.
by Rohansi 1y ago
For sure, but my phone camera sees better than I do. Cars can make use of better camera sensors and have more than two of them. You can't just extrapolate the conclusion that human vision bad = vision sensors bad.
616.
by Rohansi 1y ago
The best cameras are surely better than most peoples' eyes these days. Sensory processing is not matched, sure, but IMO how a human drives is more involved than it needs to be. We only have two eyes and they both look in the same direc
617.
by Rohansi 1y ago
Vision is almost certainly not the main issue with humans as drivers.
618.
by Rohansi 1y ago
And which ones can't be replicated with hardware?
619.
by Rohansi 1y ago
While I don't think vision-only is hopeless (it works for human drivers) the cameras on Teslas are not at all reliable enough for FSD. They have little to no redundancy and only the forward facing camera can (barely) clean itself. Even
620.
by Rohansi 1y ago
Text goes in and text comes out - simple! Works perfectly for shell scripts. /s
621.
by Rohansi 1y ago
The root of these restrictions is to try and prevent people from using dynamic code to bypass App Store reviews. If you're planning to change the functionality of your app then you must submit it for review.
622.
by Rohansi 1y ago
It's a marketing issue. LLMs are being marketed similar to Tesla's FSD - claims of PhD-level intelligence, AGI, artificial superintelligence, etc. set the expectation that LLMs should be smarter than (most of) us. Why would we hav
623.
by Rohansi 1y ago
> pretty great at linking you to primary sources Do you check all of the sources though? Those can be hallucinated and you may not notice unless you're always checking them. Or it could have misunderstood the source. It's easy
624.
by Rohansi 1y ago
DMA has shown us that Apple will do the absolute minimum to comply with changes like this. The fact that Apple is asserting it's power over an app distributed on a third-party store is a whole new example of legal changes not actually
625.
by Rohansi 1y ago
I don't know if that will happen though because, for the people who don't know or don't care about correctness, skimming through the AI "summary" is far more convenient than actually checking any of the search resul
626.
by Rohansi 1y ago
Because arguing with people who are wrong on the internet. It's no fun doing the same with an LLM because you're either actually wrong or it will assume you're right without putting up a fight
627.
by Rohansi 1y ago
The problem with that expectation is Apple never gave anyone the keys before. That decision is not hurting them so why would they change?
628.
by Rohansi 1y ago
> it's not the hardware but rather Apple's operating system software which is restricting what software applications can run on your device I disagree - the restrictions also apply at the hardware level. The entire boot process
629.
by Rohansi 1y ago
Do you really own your device if Apple has control over what you can use it for?
630.
by Rohansi 1y ago
> My car already allows me to do this. My phone should too. If you're referring to CarPlay and/or Android Auto you should know that it's not actually running on your car. It's basically RDPing your phone onto your car

More ›