NoTeslaThrow

8 ms·

61.
by NoTeslaThrow 1y ago
This seems sort of a secondary cause of our unique linguistic abilities. Afaik no other animal can use recursive grammars. Certainly not to the same extent. Anyway this also excludes all the humans that never wrote anything, which is most o
62.
by NoTeslaThrow 1y ago
Yea but there's also not much point in critiquing the government here. What we ever been able to do about it except riot? We can endlessly discuss the failures of government and as it stands I don't think we will never see these f
63.
by NoTeslaThrow 1y ago
Indeed. The editorial boards of these newsrooms are often staffed with people who attended the same schools and classes as those running the country. The social circles of the two worlds are extremely closely linked. Of course, this means t
64.
by NoTeslaThrow 1y ago
What's the risk of user supplied strings? Surely you know their size. What else is there to worry about?
65.
by NoTeslaThrow 1y ago
> Yes, it can cite sources, just like any other major LLM service out there. Let's see an example: Ask if america was ever a democracy and tell us what it uses as sources to evaluate its ability to function. Language really shows it
66.
by NoTeslaThrow 1y ago
Tbh, I just really hate the term "undefined behavior". It really feels like laziness in terms of what the possible damage might entail.
67.
by NoTeslaThrow 1y ago
> It means that anything strange that happens next isn't a language bug. This is even more vague. The language is getting blamed regardless. This makes no sense.
68.
by NoTeslaThrow 1y ago
> A format function that arbitrarily executes code from within a format string So, a template? I certainly ain't gonna be using go for its mustache support.
69.
by NoTeslaThrow 1y ago
> Isn't UB a subset of bugs No, not at all. UB can still produce correct and expected results for the entire input domain.
70.
by NoTeslaThrow 1y ago
> I'm not even sure you're qualified to comment then. I'm qualified to point out that this is a hugely dickish way to communicate
71.
by NoTeslaThrow 1y ago
> If it optimizes and there are invalid assumptions then there is likely UB. It's the distinguishing from bugs that concerns me.
72.
by NoTeslaThrow 1y ago
Ok, but in the context of the language at hand? Presumably the IR has distinct semantics from the language that generates the IR. Does UB just strictly resolve to LLVM UB? That's very reasonable!
73.
by NoTeslaThrow 1y ago
> resulting in an incorrect code. Incorrect with respect to an assumption furnished where? Your sibling comment mentions RFCs—is this behavior tied to some kind of documented expectation? > A simpler example is `Option<NonZeroU8&gt
74.
by NoTeslaThrow 1y ago
EDIT: > While not as formalized as C/C++, Rust's "spec" exists in the reference, nomicon, RFCs and documentation. I believe that there is a desire for a spec, but enough resources exist that the community can continue
75.
by NoTeslaThrow 1y ago
> This is a great way to see why invalid UTF-8 strings and unicode chars cause undefined behaviour in Rust. What does "undefined behavior" mean without a spec? Wouldn't the behavior rustc produces today be de-facto defined
76.
by NoTeslaThrow 1y ago
> Instead, initially went with the approach of hosting my dynamically updating iCal file in an S3 bucket and using ICSx5 on Android to sync with it. No CalDAV needed – just HTTPS. Well you also can't integrate this into most calenda
77.
by NoTeslaThrow 1y ago
> Please run the same query past ELIZA and Gemini 2.5 ( https://aistudio.google.com/prompts/new_chat ) and report back. I don't see much difference—you still have to take any output skeptically. I can't clai
78.
by NoTeslaThrow 1y ago
> There are no known health problems caused by this syndrome This is a causal hypothesis framed as a statement. The rhetorics indicate an authoritative statement of fact regarding what the syndrome does cause, which is fundamentally an i
79.
by NoTeslaThrow 1y ago
> There are no known health problems caused by this syndrome Presumably they mean there's no evidence of this syndrome causing health issues (presumably the "known" part is redundant). Trying to position a causal hypothesi
80.
by NoTeslaThrow 1y ago
> Their point is that it seems to function like an LLM even if it's more advanced. So did ELIZA. So did SmarterChild. Chatbots are not exactly a new technology. LLMs are at best a new cog in that same old functionality—but nothing h
81.
by NoTeslaThrow 1y ago
> The Star Trek computer from TNG is basically an LLM, really. The Star Trek computer is not like LLMs: a) it provides reliable answers, b) it is capable of reasoning, c) it is capable of actually interacting with its environment in a ra
82.
by NoTeslaThrow 1y ago
Imagine what humanity could be capable of if we had the grace to ignore the title.
83.
by NoTeslaThrow 2y ago
> Neither imply copyleft The "free software" part necessarily implies copyleft. > There is no logical reason for why GNU's jargon is somehow better than OSI's. There's no logical reason to conflate them, eithe
84.
by NoTeslaThrow 2y ago
FWIW I wiped my phone entering the country and they ushered me right through anyway. Still, I was very concerned about finding texts from other people and getting them in trouble. I think the fear is the point more than the practicality as
85.
by NoTeslaThrow 2y ago
If the idea that seeing what the effects of the weapons sales and military operations done in your name by your representatives might be too much influence on me, a voter, then I give up. There's just no reasoning with other americans
86.
by NoTeslaThrow 2y ago
Sure. People who like that definition will find this sort of finding very stimulating.
87.
by NoTeslaThrow 2y ago
I don't think intelligence is a coherent enough concept to be considered to have evolved once, let alone twice.
88.
by NoTeslaThrow 2y ago
I'm not sure what "perspective" has to do with asymmetric warfare unless the perspective is that of how many bombs are being dropped on you.
89.
by NoTeslaThrow 2y ago
I mean yea you can call anything hate if you squint hard enough. Reasonable terms of service are never going to satisfy everyone. You can definitely have your cake and eat it too so long as you don't try and please everyone.
90.
by NoTeslaThrow 2y ago
> The term FOSS is meant to unify "free software" and "open source software" I have always assumed it to mean the intersection of the two contexts. As in, necessarily copyleft. A layperson doesn't know what copyl

More ›