3 ms·
> It means that anything strange that happens next isn't a language bug. This is even more vague. The language is getting blamed regardless. This makes no sens
by NoTeslaThrow 1y ago
> It means that anything strange that happens next isn't a language bug.
This is even more vague. The language is getting blamed regardless. This makes no sense.
- dwattttt 1y agoNo: the language defined that e.g. a NonZeroU8 can't contain 0, and the only way it could is via illegal means. You don't need a formal proof to describe that. To try to characterise what any compiler, hypothetical or not, does if you nonetheless produce one (again, via means that aren't valid) isn't meaningful.