NoTeslaThrow

8 ms·

1. 91.▲
   by NoTeslaThrow 2y ago

   If english had static checks this kind of runtime pedantry would be unnecessary. Sometimes it's nice to devote part of your brain to productivity rather than checking coherence.
2. 92.▲
   by NoTeslaThrow 2y ago

   Hell, just go full erlang at that point and you get loads of services for "free".
3. 93.▲
   by NoTeslaThrow 2y ago

   > For instance, being distracted, poor reaction times, or not being able to monitor all angles simultaneously. As a pitch for self driving, it's going to be a long time before I trust a computer to do the above better than I do. At
4. 94.▲
   by NoTeslaThrow 2y ago

   Human vision isn't good enough, though. Otherwise why not just drive the car yourself?
5. 95.▲
   by NoTeslaThrow 2y ago

   > the investigation showed how extremely reckless negligent and careless Waltz was This is just a case where there's an individual to blame. We're looking back at at least eighty years of negligence and recklessness. Basically
6. 96.▲
   by NoTeslaThrow 2y ago

   > but vision quality is not really a major source of human accidents. Never driven before?
7. 97.▲
   by NoTeslaThrow 2y ago

   I'm not really following the attempt at logic here but under this logic surely you'd WANT multiple types of sensors for all the same reasons.