Ansil849

46 ms·

451.
by Ansil849 5y ago
They sure do [1]. [1] https://krebsonsecurity.com/2015/01/spreading-the-disease-an...
452.
by Ansil849 5y ago
> The entire attack lasted just one minute. Did the attack last one minute because Cloudflare 'mitigated' it after that, or because the attackers stopped?
453.
by Ansil849 5y ago
> I just wish they'd stop removing prominent Americans from what they publish. What is the point of making incendiary comments like this but then not providing any evidence to back them up? Which prominent Americans are ICIJ removin
454.
by Ansil849 5y ago
> Mint mobile. Buy the SIM card with cash. Where can you buy a SIM card with cash and not have to show any ID? And for bonus points: where you will also not be recorded on CCTV doing so.
455.
by Ansil849 5y ago
> Others ask why Twitter does redirections, and it seems that everyone here forgot that marketers love their Bit.ly and Sprinklr links so much that Twitter needs to have a concession here. As far as I know, users cannot view the metrics
456.
by Ansil849 5y ago
> Apple has hardened their hardware against attackers replacing components of the phone with compromised versions. What specifically is being guarded against by not allowing users to replace a screen, as in this case?
457.
by Ansil849 5y ago
> and it's always been neutral or positive - a manager I don't have regular conversations with wants an update on something big they know I'm working on, my immediate manager wants to tell me about an upcoming project and
458.
by Ansil849 5y ago
Honestly, Google can now do most of the basic things that WA could do. And the more complex things WA could do oftentimes require a bunch of trial and error to figure out the correct syntax/phrasing to use to get correct results, to t
459.
by Ansil849 5y ago
Tons of comments here agreeing that this kind of vague messaging is to be avoided (and I'll toss my comment in there as also being in agreement). But....clearly there are people out there who use this kind of communicaton, some of them
460.
by Ansil849 5y ago
What does it mean that lots of the hay is listed as not being "tested"?
461.
Facebook investor exposes metaverse rollout as distraction(foxbusiness.com)
4 points by Ansil849 5y ago|1 comments
462.
by Ansil849 5y ago
No, I don't mean any of the flagship attractions like the Dungeon. The one I'm thinking of is small one on the strip by the Aquarium.
463.
by Ansil849 5y ago
In London, in the area around the London Eye, there is a tourist trap that offers a very poor 'haunted house' type of attraction, usually something having to do with zombies. As each iteration of this tourist trap gains a reputati
464.
by Ansil849 5y ago
> eliminating all that have smart apps would probably leave me with no choices I really don't understand why otherwise tech-savvy users start acting like generic deer-in-the-headlights consumer tropes when faced with the prospect o
465.
by Ansil849 5y ago
You could sell it on the secondary market (either whole or piecemeal) and use the money towards purchasing an alternate?
466.
by Ansil849 5y ago
> Samsung TVs are basically giant billboard you pay to have in your home. You say this, and yet you have one in your home. And this contradiction is why these things continue to thrive: because even people who care...also don't care
467.
by Ansil849 5y ago
> 1. Because ad-supported hardware makes for low prices and people prefer to pay less. Is this actually true though? I'd love to see an analysis of pricing in relation to the amount of adware a TV has. My gut instinct is that you wo
468.
by Ansil849 5y ago
> Is this a Samsung app that you would never see if you have no interest in smart apps and leave your TV off the internet? Because if so that's easily avoided So the problem with this approach is that, yes sure if you have the techn
469.
by Ansil849 5y ago
> In fact, I'd personally murder a family of pigs if it was the only way I'd ever be able to eat pork steaks again. They're that delicious, and I am that selfish. > Life isn't nice. It's brutal, short, and spr
470.
by Ansil849 5y ago
What strawman? If anything, I am using reductio ad absurdum to show how your argument is asinine. You have yet to answer the question of why you think killing people is more acceptable than killing elephants. Or you could, you know, admit y
471.
by Ansil849 5y ago
You stated, plain as day: > killing a non-endangered animal for sustenance is more acceptable than killing an endangered animal for a necklace pendant (or any other reason). Any other questions? Humans are non-endangered animals, are the
472.
by Ansil849 5y ago
So you don't see the absurdity of this? At all? You're literally saying killing people is more acceptable than killing elephants.
473.
by Ansil849 5y ago
> It's impossible to exist in modern society without using fossil fuels. Come on my dude. There's a massive middle ground between "attempting to exist in modern society without using fossil fuels" and ignoring any per
474.
by Ansil849 5y ago
All consumers are being lied to and manipulated, that is the entire purpose of marketing. At some point, individual accountability has to be taken into consideration. You can't get by in life by just claiming to have been suckered ever
475.
by Ansil849 5y ago
> People like these would be held accountable for their in bad faith actions. They damaged all the world just for profit, thieves in the streets get ready more for much much less. What about holding the people who actually buy the produc
476.
by Ansil849 5y ago
Except that's not what the question I was responding to is implying. It seems to be implying it is OK to be doing harm to species which are not endangered.
477.
by Ansil849 5y ago
What is your point? That it's acceptable to kill or otherwise maim creatures which are not endangered, like, say, humans?
478.
by Ansil849 5y ago
There's a world of difference between feeling that "you can always be doing more" and criticizing poaching on the internet an hour before sitting down to enjoy a steak dinner.
479.
by Ansil849 5y ago
I mean is that then true for most fruit, since they all largely consist of sugar and water?
480.
by Ansil849 5y ago
I know this sounds like a frivolous lawsuit, but at the same time, requiring companies to have more real fruit in food also doesn't strike me as a bad thing.

More ›