2 ms·
Correct solution here is to make sure royalties are embedded in the AI responses (and work output). These should be appropriately priced and go back to the own
by AdamN 15d ago
Correct solution here is to make sure royalties are embedded in the AI responses (and work output). These should be appropriately priced and go back to the owners of the IP. If the IP is no longer owned then it can be free use.
There should be a carveout for non-profit or government AI.
- pier25 15d agoAI content cannot be copyrighted.
- AdamN 15d agoFirst of all it can. Second I'm talking about attribution to copywritten material (and royalties being paid accordingly). This would only be for for-profit AI implementations though.
- pier25 15d agoNot in the US. https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-appeals-court-rejects-copyrights-ai-generated-art-lacking-human-creator-2025-03-18/ https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-appeals-court-rejects-co... As for your second point I doubt it will ever be economically feasible. AI companies cannot generate profits even while stealing their training data.