794CD01

29 ms·

361.
by 794CD01 10y ago
Yes, as a wise man once said, people in this country have had enough of experts.
362.
by 794CD01 10y ago
As opposed to human-driven cars, which keep going and run you over?
363.
by 794CD01 10y ago
Keeping the car in its lane is overrated. Any human who drives in snow knows the rules. If there are other cars around, center yourself with respect to them. If there are not, lanes are irrelevant. Even many narrow side streets in snowless
364.
by 794CD01 10y ago
>Humanity cannot progress by leaving people behind. Most historical evidence suggests the opposite.
365.
by 794CD01 10y ago
Unfortunately the current favored presidential candidate wants to make that situation illegal by raising the federal minimum wage to 12 or more.
366.
by 794CD01 10y ago
A car driving around with no human inside poses less risk to human life than a car driving around with a human inside who is unable to control the car.
367.
by 794CD01 10y ago
Whether the US is a force for good is a completely different argument than whether it's untrustworthy and/or undemocratic.
368.
by 794CD01 10y ago
Sounds like a good fit for a student or someone who wants to break in to the software industry who is looking for product management experience.
369.
by 794CD01 10y ago
Of course not, but it's exacerbated by open source. Humans are indeed poison, which is why it's normal to involve as few humans as possible. Unfortunately AI is not sufficiently advanced so you still need some of them in order to
370.
by 794CD01 10y ago
Why is winning the math olympiad "about their image" and not about academic excellence or even just the spirit of competition? And how is buying tanks the military tells congress they don't need really a better use of money t
371.
by 794CD01 10y ago
As long as they're not cheating, what's the problem? Is providing great incentives to students who excel academically somehow a bad thing?
372.
by 794CD01 10y ago
Then why not start your own lobbying firm that imports talent from China and outcompete everyone else?
373.
by 794CD01 10y ago
Yes, but it's very simple and very common to use a VPN to circumvent their block on voip services, whereas I do not know of a way to use a VPN to rape someone, so I went with what I found to be the more reasonable example.
374.
by 794CD01 10y ago
Accessing Netflix is not a crime, so using a VPN to access netflix would not be. If you used a VPN in a different country to access Netflix in order to circumvent their licensing restrictions, it probably becomes a complex matter of interna
375.
by 794CD01 10y ago
Using voip services like Skype is a crime. I would guess that is the main target of this law, since using VPNs to circumvent the present ban on such services is very common.
376.
by 794CD01 10y ago
I didn't say it was not a problem, I said the headline was inaccurate and misleading, because it was, and that their other bad laws deserve more focus, because they do. If they only outlawed things that deserved to be criminalized, lik
377.
by 794CD01 10y ago
The headline is sensationalized and inaccurate. The actual law reads: >“Whoever uses a fraudulent computer network protocol address (IP address) by using a false address or a third-party address by any other means for the purpose of comm
378.
by 794CD01 10y ago
"He's more skilled than you" sounds far more toxic than either of those "bad" reasons you gave as examples.
379.
by 794CD01 10y ago
We have, up until this point, lived in a polite society. It's unreasonable to expect that this can continue in a world globally connected through the internet.
380.
by 794CD01 10y ago
Their attitude has proven to be largely unsuccessful. Why should they be obligated to preserve it?
381.
by 794CD01 10y ago
It works poorly. A true article that destroys someone's reputation is equally harmful, but (in the US), completely protected.
382.
by 794CD01 10y ago
Yes, this is exactly what you should expect from a free service like Google's. No reliability, and no support. If you need an SLA, pay for one.
383.
by 794CD01 10y ago
My work isn't child pornography, so that reconsideration does not change my affirmative answer.
384.
by 794CD01 10y ago
"Directly resulting in their harm" is an unenforceable standard, unless you are referring to hitting someone with a printed copy, which I suspect you are not.
385.
by 794CD01 10y ago
Sure, some countries have stupid laws. I would still say homosexuals are people who deserve the same rights as anyone else, even though there are countries where that is not true.
386.
by 794CD01 10y ago
It's not actually in copmany B's space. It's in Niantic's database and the associated coordinates match the location of company B. The law doesn't come into it. You don't own information just because it happens
387.
by 794CD01 10y ago
I would not develop software meant to run on specialized hardware like a modern gaming computer on something less powerful than the target platform. That's just asking for trouble.
388.
by 794CD01 10y ago
That's not true. My gaming PC costs about that much, and normal consumers don't have something like that.
389.
by 794CD01 10y ago
Their hands are not the problem, it's the brain driving those hands that shouldn't be trusted.
390.
by 794CD01 10y ago
I mean that we expect patients to provide "informed consent" to medical treatment, something which is impossible because the vast majority of patients are not physicians, and even those who are will usually not be experts in the r

More ›