4 ms·
"Directly resulting in their harm" is an unenforceable standard, unless you are referring to hitting someone with a printed copy, which I suspect you are not.
by 794CD01 10y ago
"Directly resulting in their harm" is an unenforceable standard, unless you are referring to hitting someone with a printed copy, which I suspect you are not.
- true_religion 10y agoAn example of direct harm, would be an totally imaginary article that aims to humiliate or defame someone. It's not true; it's not real, but its directly aimed at destroying a persons reputation anyways. This is something that current day harassment laws (and in some countries slander laws) already cover.
- 794CD01 10y agoIt works poorly. A true article that destroys someone's reputation is equally harmful, but (in the US), completely protected.