17 ms·
Search tool that only returns content created before ChatGPT's public release
- johng 11mo agoI don't know how this works under the hood but it seems like no matter how it works, it could be gamed quite easily.
- cryzinger 11mo agoIf it's just using Google search "before <x date>" filtering I don't think there's a way to game it... but I guess that depends on whether Google uses the date that it indexed a page versus the date that a page itself declares.
- madars 11mo agoDate displayed in Google Search results is often the self-described date from the document itself. Take a look at this "FOIA + before Jan 1, 1990" search: https://www.google.com/search?q=foia&tbs=cdr:1,cd_max:1/1/1990&start=10 https://www.google.com/search?q=foia&tbs=cdr:1,cd_max:1/1/19... None of these documents were actually published on the web by then, incl., a Watergate PDF bearing date of Nov 21, 1974 - almost 20 years before PDF format got released. Of course, WWW itself started in 1991. Google Search's date filter is useful for finding documents about historical topics, but unreliable for proving when information actually became publicly available online.
- littlestymaar 11mo agoAre you sure it works the same way for documents that Google indexed at the time of publication? (Because obviously for things that existed before Google, they had to accept the publication date at face value).
- madars 11mo agoYes, it works the same way even for content Google indexed at publication time. For example, here are chatgpt.com links that Google displays as being from 2010-2020, a period when Google existed but ChatGPT did not: https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Achatgpt.com&tbs=cdr%3A1%2Ccd_min%3A1%2F1%2F2010%2Ccd_max%3A1%2F1%2F2020&tbm https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Achatgpt.com&tbs=cdr%3... So it looks like Google uses inferred dates over its own indexing timestamps, even for recently crawled pages from domains that didn't exist during the claimed date range.
- littlestymaar 11mo agoInteresting, thanks. I wonder why they do that when they could use time of first indexing instead.
- qwertygnu 11mo agoTrue, but there's probably many ways to do this and unless AI content starts falsifying tons of its metadata (which I'm sure would have other consequences), there's definitely a way. Plus other sites that link to the content could also give away it's date of creation, which is out of the control of the AI content.
- layman51 11mo agoI have heard of a forum (I believe it was Physics Forums) which was very popular in the older days of the internet where some of the older posts were actually edited so that they were completely rewritten with new content. I forget what the reasoning behind it was, but it did feel shady and unethical. If I remember correctly, the impetus behind it was that the website probably went under new ownership and the new owners felt that it was okay to take over the accounts of people who hadn't logged on in several years and to completely rewrite the content of their posts. I believe I learned about it through HN, and it was this blog post: https://hallofdreams.org/posts/physicsforums/ https://hallofdreams.org/posts/physicsforums/ It kind of reminds me of why some people really covet older accounts when they are trying to do a social engineering attack.
- joshuaissac 11mo ago> website probably went under new ownership According to the article, it was the founder himself who was doing this.
- CGamesPlay 11mo ago"Gamed quite easily" seems like a stretch, given that the target is definitionally not moving. The search engine is fundamentally searching an immutable dataset that "just" needs to be cleaned.
- johng 11mo agoHow? They have an index from a previous date and nothing new will be allowed since that date? A whole copy of the internet? I don't think so.... I'm guessing, like others, it's based on the date the user/website/blog lists in the post. Which they can change at any time.
- fragmede 11mo agoYes they do. It's called common crawl, and is available from your chosen hyperscaler vendor.
- 1gn15 11mo agoDoes this filter out traditional SEO blogfarms?
- JKCalhoun 11mo agoYeah, might prefer AI-slop to marketing-slop.
- al_borland 11mo agoThey are the same. I was looking for something and tried AI. It gave me a list of stuff. When I asked for its sources, it linked me to some SEO/Amazon affiliate slop. All AI is doing is making it harder to know what is good information and what is slop, because it obscures the source, or people ignore the source links.
- venturecruelty 11mo agoI've started just going to more things in person, asking friends for recommendations, and reading more books (should've been doing all of these anyway). There are some niche communities online I still like, and the fediverse is really neat, but I'm not sure we can stem the Great Pacific Garbage Patch-levels of slop, at this point. It's really sad. The web, as we know and love it, is well and truly dead.
- swyx 11mo agosomebody said once we are mining "low-background tokens" like we are mining low-background (radiation) steel post WW2 and i couldnt shake the concept out of my head (wrote up in https://www.latent.space/i/139368545/the-concept-of-low-background-tokens https://www.latent.space/i/139368545/the-concept-of-low-back... - but ironically repeating something somebody else said online is kinda what i'm willingly participating in, and it's unclear why human-origin tokens should be that much higher signal than ai-origin ones)
- jeffchuber 11mo agothat was me swyx
- rollulus 11mo agoMultiple people have coined the idea repeatedly, way before you. The oldest comment on HN I could find was in December 2022 by user spawarotti: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33856172 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33856172
- threeducks 11mo agoHere is an even older comment chain about it from 2020: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23895706 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23895706 Apparently, comparing low-background steel to pre-LLM text is a rather obvious analogy.
- rollulus 11mo agoOh wow, great find! That’s really early days.
- pseidemann 11mo agoAs well as that people often do think alike. If you have a thought, it's likely it's not new.
- jeffchuber 11mo ago
- k_roy 11mo ago[flagged]
- rockskon 11mo ago"You know what's almost worse than something bad? People complaining about something bad."
- k_roy 11mo agoShrug. Sure. Point still stands. It’s not going anywhere. And the literal hate and pure vitriol I’ve seen towards people on social media, even when they say “oh yeah; this is AI”, is unbelievable. So many online groups have just become toxic shitholes because someone once or twice a week posts something AI generated
- rockskon 11mo agoWhat isn't going anywhere? You're kidding yourself if you think every single place AI is used will withstand the test of time. You're also kidding yourself if you think consumer sentiment will play no part in determining which uses of AI will eventually die off. I don't think anyone seriously believes the technology will categorically stop being used anytime soon. But then again we still keep using tech thats 50+ years old as it is.
- venturecruelty 11mo agoThe entire US GDP for the last few quarters is being propped up by GPU vendors and one singular chatbot company, all betting that they can make a trillion dollars on $20-per-month "it's not just X, it's Y" Markov chain generators. We have six to 12 more months of this before the first investor says "wait a minute, we're not making enough money", and the house of cards comes tumbling down. Also, maybe consider why people are upset about being consistently and sneakily lied to about whether or not an actual human wrote something. What's more likely: that everyone who's angry is wrong, or that you're misunderstanding why they're upset?
- 11mo ago
- anticensor 11mo agoYou should call it Predecember, referring to the eternal December.
- unfunco 11mo agoSeptember?
- littlestymaar 11mo agoChatGPT was released exactly 3 years ago (on the 30th of November) so December it is in this context.
- permo-w 11mo agosurely that would be eternal November then
- littlestymaar 11mo agoNo, being released on Nov 30th means November was still before the slop era.
- retsibsi 11mo agoIn the end the analogy doesn't really work, because 'eternal September' referred to what used to be a regular, temporary thing (an influx of noobs disrupting the online culture, before eventually leaving or assimilating) becoming the new normal. 'Eternal {month associated with ChatGPT}' doesn't fit because LLM-generated content was never a periodic phenomenon.
- hackable_sand 11mo agoAI R&D certainly was periodic. Good thing we put a stop to that!
- 11mo ago
- themanmaran 11mo agoThe low-background steel of the internet https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low-background_steel https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low-background_steel
- HelloUsername 11mo agoAs mentioned half a year ago at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44239481 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44239481
- thm 11mo agoAs mentioned 7 months ago https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43811732 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43811732
- Ginger-Pickles 11mo agoAs mentioned in this thread :P https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46103662 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46103662
- tkgally 11mo agoSomewhat related, the leaderboard of em-dash users on HN before ChatGPT: https://www.gally.net/miscellaneous/hn-em-dash-user-leaderboard-v2.html https://www.gally.net/miscellaneous/hn-em-dash-user-leaderbo...
- maplethorpe 11mo agoThey should include users who used a double hyphen, too -- not everyone has easy access to em dashes.
- venturecruelty 11mo agoOof, I feel like you'll accidentally capture a lot of getopt_long() fans. ;)
- Kinrany 11mo agoExcluding those with asymmetrical whitespace around might be enough
- gblargg 11mo agoDoes AI use double hyphens? I thought the point was to find who wasn't AI that used proper em dashes.
- jader201 11mo agoAnytime I do this — and I did it long before AI did — they are always em dashes, because iOS/macOS translates double dashes to em dashes. I think there may be a way to disable this, but I don’t care enough to bother. If people want to think my posts are AI generated, oh well.
- teiferer 11mo agoThere is also the difference in using space around em-dashes.
- hekkle 11mo ago[flagged]
- VoidWhisperer 11mo agoBesides this being spam, the linked leaderboard is pre-chatgpt, it doesnt care about comments made now
- hekkle 11mo ago[flagged]
- GaryBluto 11mo agoWhy use this when you can use the before: syntax on most search engines?
- aDyslecticCrow 11mo agodoesn't actually do anything anymore in Google or bing.
- Thorrez 11mo agoSearching Google for chatgpt vs chatgpt before:2022-01-01 give me quite different results. In the 2nd query, most results have a date listed next to them in the results page, and that date is always prior to 2022. So the date filtering is "working". However, most of the dates are actually Google making a mistake and misinterpreting some unimportant date it found on the page as the date the page was created. At least one result is a Youtube video posted before 2022, that edited its title after Chatgpt was released to say Chatgpt. Disclosure: I work at Google, but not on search.
- GaryBluto 11mo agoI use it frequently to find older websites to browse. Works relatively well for most search terms. If you want something from 2005 or before I find -inurl:https works well.
- progman32 11mo agoNot affiliated, but I've been using kagi's date range filter to similar effect. The difference in results for car maintenance subjects is astounding (and slightly infuriating).
- permo-w 11mo agobesides for training future models, is this really such a big deal? most of the AI-gened text content is just replacing content-farm SEO-spam anyway. the same stuff that any half-awares person wouldn't have read in the past is now slightly better written, using more em dashes and instances of the word "delve". if you're consistently being caught out by this stuff then likely you need to improve your search hygiene, nothing so drastic as this the only place I've ever had any issue with AI content is r/chess, where people love to ask ChatGPT a question and then post the answer as if they wrote it, half the time seemingly innocently, which, call me racist, but I suspect is mostly due to the influence of the large and young Indian contingent. otherwise I really don't understand where the issue lies. follow the exact same rules you do for avoiding SEO spam and you will be fine
- system2 11mo agoYes indeed, it is a problem. Now the old good sites have turned into AI-slop sites because they can't fight the spammers by writing slowly with humans.
- permo-w 11mo agoif a potential defense is to simply the spammers, then the site was previously just as likely to start hiring content-farm human slop writers as they are now likely to use AI, i.e. the site probably wasn't that great in the first place and had equal potential to deteriorate, AI or no
- pajamasam 11mo agoSEO-spam was often at least somewhat factual and not complete generated garbage. Recipe sites, for example, usually have a button that lets you skip the SEO stuff and get to the actual recipe. Also, the AI slop is covering almost every sentence or phrase you can think of to search. Before, if I used more niche search phrases and exact searches, I was pretty much guaranteed to get specific results. Now, I have to wade through pages and pages of nonsense.
- Cadwhisker 11mo agoIn the past, I'd find one wrong answer and I could easily spot the copies. Now there's a dozen different sites with the same wrong answer, just with better formatting and nicer text.
- tobr 11mo agoFor images, https://same.energy https://same.energy is a nice option that, being abandoned but still functioning since a few years, seems to naturally not have crawled any AI images. And it’s all around a great product.
- tejaallu 11mo ago[dead]
- tejaallu 11mo ago[dead]
- tejaallu 11mo ago[dead]
- voiper1 11mo agoOf course my first thought was: Let's use this as a tool for AI searches (when I don't need recent news).
- ricardo81 11mo agoFWIW Mojeek (an organic search engine in the classic sense) can do this with the before: operator. https://www.mojeek.com/search?q=britney+spears+before%3A20100101 https://www.mojeek.com/search?q=britney+spears+before%3A2010...
- pknerd 11mo agoSomething generated by humans does not mean high quality.
- decremental 11mo ago[dead]
- Krssst 11mo agoYes, but AI-generated is always low quality so it makes sense to filter it out.
- IshKebab 11mo agoI wouldn't say always... Especially because you probably only noticed the bad slop. Usually it is crap though.
- josephjrobison 11mo agoGrokipedia would like a word
- a5c11 11mo agoAt least when reading a human-made material you can spot author's uncertainty in some topics. Usually, when someone doesn't have knowledge of something, he doesn't try to describe that. AI, however, will try to convince you that pigs can fly.
- cryptozeus 11mo agotechnically you can ask chatgpt to return the same result by asking it to filter by year
- deleted 11mo ago[deleted]
- RomanPushkin 11mo agoFor that purpose I do not update my book on LeanPub about Ruby. I just know one day people gonna read it more, because human-written content would be gold.
- zkmon 11mo agoMost of college courses and school books haven't changed in decades. Some reputed college keep courses for Pascal and Fortran instead of Python or Java, just because, it might affect their reputation of being classical or pure or to match their campus buildings style.
- fastasucan 11mo agoOr because the core knowledge stay the same no matter how it is expressed.
- defraudbah 11mo agoChatGPT also returns content only created before ChatGPT release, which is why I still have to google damn it!
- fragmede 11mo agoClick the globe icon below the input box to enable web searching by ChatGPT.
- stinos 11mo agoIs that still the case? And even if so how is it going to avoid keeping it like that in the future? Are they going to stop scraping new content, or are they going to filter it with a tool which recognizes their own content?
- defraudbah 11mo agoit's a known problem in ML, I think grok solved it partially and chatGPT uses another model on top to search web like suggested below. Hence MLOps field appeared, to solve models management I find it a bit annoying to navigate between hallucinations and outdated content. Too much invalid information to filter out.
- ETH_start 11mo agoI'm grateful that I published a large body of content pre-ChatGPT so that I have proof that I'm not completely inarticulate without AI.
- ListAndFuse 11mo ago[dead]
- phplovesong 11mo agoThe slop is getting worse, as there is so much llm generated shit online, now new models are getting trained on the slop. Slop training slop, and slop. We have gone full circle just in a matter of a few years.
- muixoozie 11mo agoI was replaying Cyberpunk 2077 and trying to think of all the ways one might have dialed up the dystopia to 11 (beyond what the game does). And pervasive AI slop was never on my radar. Kinda reminds me of the foreword in Neuromancer bringing attention to the fact the book was written before cellphones became popular. It's already fucking with my mind. I recently watched Frankenstein 2025 and 100% thought gen ai had a role in the CGI only to find out the director hates it so much he rather die than use it. I've been noticing little things in old movies and anime where I thought to myself (if I didn't know this was made before gen ai, I would have thought this was generated for sure). One example (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pGSNhVQFbOc&t=412 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pGSNhVQFbOc&t=412) cityscape background in this a outro scene with buildings built on top of buildings gave me ai vibes (really the only thing in this whole anime), yet this came out ~1990. So I can already recognize a paranoia / bias in myself and really can't reliably tell what's real.. Probably also other people have this and why some non-zero number of people always thinks every blog post that comes out was written by gen ai.
- Cyan488 11mo agoI had the same experience, watching a nature documentary on a streaming service recently. It was... not so good, at least at the beginning. I was wondering if this was a pilot for AI generated content on this streaming service. Actually, it came out in 2015 and was just low budget.
- dinkblam 11mo agogoogle results were already 90% SEO crap long before ChatGPT just use Kagi and block all SEO sites...
- paweladamczuk 11mo agoHow do we (or Kagi) know which ones are "SEO sites"? Is there some filter list or other method to determine that?
- Jolter 11mo agoIf you took Google of 2006, and used that iteration of the pagerank algorithm, you’d probably not get most of the SEO spam that’s so prevalent in Google results today.
- joshvm 11mo agoIt seems like a mixture of heuristics, explicit filtering and user reports. https://help.kagi.com/kagi/features/slopstop.html https://help.kagi.com/kagi/features/slopstop.html That's specifically for AI generated content, but there are other indicators like how many affiliate links are on the page and how many other users have downvoted the site in their results. The other aspect is network effect, in that everyone tunes their sites to rank highly on Google. That's presumably less effective on other indices?
- shevy-java 11mo ago> This is a search tool that will only return content created before ChatGPT's first public release on November 30, 2022. The problem is that Google's search engine - but, oddly enough, ALL search engines - got worse before that already. I noticed that search engines got worse several years before 2022. So, AI further decreased the quality, but the quality had a downwards trend already, as it was. There are some attempts to analyse this on youtube (also owned by Google - Google ruins our digital world); some explanations made sense to me, but even then I am not 100% certain why Google decided to ruin google search. One key observation I made was that the youtube search, was copied onto Google's regular search, which makes no sense for google search. If I casually search for a video on youtube, I may be semi-interested in unrelated videos. But if I search on Google search for specific terms, I am not interested in crap such as "others also searched for xyz" - that is just ruining the UI with irrelevant information. This is not the only example, Google made the search results worse here and tries to confuse the user in clicking on things. Plus placement of ads. The quality really worsened.
- justinclift 11mo agoAre you aware of Kagi (kagi.com)? With them, at least the AI stuff can be turned off. Membership is presently about 61k, and seems to be growing about 2k per month: https://kagi.com/stats https://kagi.com/stats
- amelius 11mo agoBe aware of: https://www.reddit.com/r/SearchKagi/comments/1gvlqhm/disappointed_in_kagis_decision_to_integrate_yandex/ https://www.reddit.com/r/SearchKagi/comments/1gvlqhm/disappo...
- justinclift 11mo agoDamn. I didn't know that. Now we need a 2nd Kagi, so we can switch to that one instead. :(
- smusamashah 11mo agoThere are few other powerful countries, with countless Web services, who freely wages war(s) on other countries and support wars in many different ways. Is there a way to avoid their products?
- EGreg 11mo agoCan't we just append "before:2021-01-01" to Google? I use this to find old news articles for instance.
- theodric 11mo agoThis tool has no future. We have that in common with it, I fear. What we really need to do is build an AI tool to filter out the AI automatically. Anybody want to help me found this company?
- bizview 11mo ago[dead]
- keiferski 11mo agoProjects like this remind me of a plot point in the Cyberpunk 2077 game universe. The "first internet" got too infected with dangerous AIs, so much so that a massive firewall needed to be built, and a "new" internet was built that specifically kept out the harmful AIs. (Or something like that: it's been awhile since I played the game, and I don't remember the specific details of the story.) It makes me wonder if a new human-only internet will need to be made at some point. It's mostly sci-fi speculation at this point, and you'd really need to hash out the details, but I am thinking of something like a meatspace-first network that continually verifies your humanity in order for you to retain access. That doesn't solve the copy-paste problem, or a thousand other ones, but I'm just thinking out loud here.
- jascha_eng 11mo agoThe problem really is that it is impossible to verify that the content someone uploads came from their mind and not a computer program. And at some point probably all content is at least influenced by AI. The real issue is also not that I used chatgpt to look up a synonym or asked a question before writing an article, the problem is when I copy paste the content and claim I wrote it.
- Ylpertnodi 11mo ago> The problem really is that it is impossible to verify that the content someone uploads came from their mind and not a computer program. Er...digital id.
- _heimdall 11mo agoIgnoring the privacy and security issues for a moment, how would having a digital ID prove that the blog post I put on my site came only out of my own mind and I didn't use an LLM for it?
- visarga 11mo ago> the problem is when I copy paste the content and claim I wrote it Why is this the problem and not the reverse - using AI without adding anything original into the soup? I could paraphrase an AI response in my own words and it will be no better. But even if I used AI, if it writes my ideas, then it would not be AI slop.
- Roritharr 11mo agoI hope there's an uncensored version of the Internet Archive somewhere, I wish I could look at my website ca. 2001, but I think it got removed because of some fraudulent DMCA claim somewhere in the early 2010s.
- lxgr 11mo ago> This is a search tool that will only return content created before ChatGPT's first public release on November 30, 2022. How does it do that? At least Google seems to take website creation date metadata at face value.
- deleted 11mo ago[deleted]
- erikpukinskis 11mo agoInteresting concept. As a side benefit this would allow you to make steady progress fighting SEO slop as well, since there can be no arms race if you are ignoring new content. You could even add options for later cutoffs… for example, you could use today’s AIs to detect yesterday’s AI slop.
- softwaredoug 11mo agoThe other day I was researching with ChatGPT. * ChatGPT hallucinated an answer * ChatGPT put it in my memory, so it persisted between conversations * When asked for a citation, ChatGPT found 2 AI created articles to back itself up It took a while, but I eventually found human written documentation from the organization that created the technical thingy I was investigating. This happens A LOT for topics on the edge of knowledge easily found on the Web. Where you have to do true research, evaluate sources, and make good decisions on what you trust.
- fireflash38 11mo agoAI reminds me of combing through stackoverflow answers. The first one might work... Or it might not. Try again, find a different SO problem and answer. Maybe third times the charm... Except it's all via the chat bot and it isn't as easy to get it to move off of a broken solution.
- visarga 11mo agoSimple solution - run the same query on 3 different LLMs with different search integrations, if they concur chances of hallucination are low.
- baconbrand 11mo agoOr you could just… not use LLMs
- asdff 11mo agoOr they've converged on the same bullshit
- softwaredoug 11mo agoUltimately, once I had a spidey sense something was wrong I double checked ChatGPT using Claude
- vertnerd 11mo agoJust the other evening, as my family argued about whether some fact was or was not fake, I detached from the conversation and began fantasizing about whether it was still possible to buy a paper encyclopedia.
- stopthe 11mo agoIn hindsight, that would've been a real utility use case for NFTs. A decentralized cryptographic prove that some content existed in a particular form at a particular moment.
- Barathkanna 11mo agoI didn’t know “eccentric engineering” was even a term before reading this. It’s fascinating how much creativity went into solving problems before large models existed. There’s something refreshing about seeing humans brute force the weird edges of a system instead of outsourcing everything to an LLM. It also makes me wonder how future kids will see this era. Maybe it will look the same way early mechanical computers look to us. A short period where people had to be unusually inquisitive just to make things work.
- hombre_fatal 11mo agoMaybe like how I view my dad and the punchcard era: cool and endearing that he went through that, but thankful that I don’t have to.
- dpedu 11mo agoI mean I get it, but it seems a bit silly. What's next - an image search engine that only returns images created before photoshop?
- josephjrobison 11mo agoThe real gold is content created before the internet!
- javaskrrt 11mo agoThis is such a great idea
- audiala 11mo agoIt doesn't really work. I tried my website and it shows up, while definitely being built after 2023. There is a mistake in the metadata of the page that shows it as from 2011. https://audiala.com/changelog https://audiala.com/changelog
- potato-peeler 11mo agoYou don’t need an extension to do this. Simply add a “before:” search filter to your search query, eg - https://www.google.com/search?q=Happiness+before%3A2022 https://www.google.com/search?q=Happiness+before%3A2022
- dwa3592 11mo agoso it's a filter by date and you chose the chatgpt's public release?
- Bad_Initialism 11mo agoHow about a search engine that only returns what you searched for, and not a million other unrelated things that it hopes you might like to buy? This goes for you, too, website search.
- diavarlyani 11mo agoWe now need an extension to hide 3 years of the internet because it was written by robots. This timeline is undefeated.
- throwawayk7h 11mo agoI noticed AI-generated slop taking over google search results well before ChatGPT. So I don't agree with the premise on this site that you can be "you can be sure that it was written or produced by the human hand."
- 1vuio0pswjnm7 11mo ago"This browser extension uses the Google search API to only return content published before Nov 30th, 2022 so you can be sure that it was written or produced by the human hand."
- micromacrofoot 11mo agoWhat kind of heuristics does it use to determine age? a lot of content on Google actually backdates for some reason... presumably some sort of SEO scam?
- stocksinsmocks 11mo agoI really thought this was going to be the Dewey Decimal system. Exclude sources from this century. It’s the only way to be sure.
- ris 11mo agoFor a while I've been saying it's a pity we hadn't been regularly trusted-timestamping everything before that point as a matter of course.
- deleted 11mo ago[deleted]
- 2OEH8eoCRo0 11mo agolow-background information
- DontForgetMe 11mo agoThis is an imperfect search extension. It's a hell of a lot better than nothing, if one is using chrome or Firefox (neither of which are my primary browsers).
- Ajakks 11mo agoIf I want dead information I'll go find a newspaper. This is kind of silly. Even if AI rewrites the entire internet - we aren't going to live in a time capsule. Plus, the AI already read everything made before 2023, so what does it matter? Creatives need to think a bit bigger with this particular issue.