Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
pajamasam
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
4 ms
·
1.
▲
by
pajamasam
12d ago
I think your unpilled and lower tier pills are often disguised anti-pills. Anti-pilled as in AI is morally bad. I count myself as both ASI pilled and anti-pilled.
2.
▲
by
pajamasam
18d ago
I'd be interested in what data they're using in the first place. It looks like their data is behind a paywall. Also, funny that their page with for "Companies running Cloudflare" says there are only "887 European or
3.
▲
by
pajamasam
20d ago
None of the most read books of 2026 so far according to Goodreads are significantly older ( https://www.goodreads.com/book/most_read?category=all&countr... ). Also not the most sold Amazon books: https://w
4.
▲
by
pajamasam
20d ago
It’s how they make money
5.
▲
by
pajamasam
1mo ago
longreads.com, my RSS feeds in NetNewsWire, and podcasts mostly
6.
▲
by
pajamasam
1mo ago
Apparently we can because a lot (most?) of us are still using GitHub even after all their outages recently.
7.
▲
by
pajamasam
2mo ago
> anyone saying that’s a sign of LLM use should not be listened to You don't need to believe me. You can read the studies about its statistically higher occurrence in LLM writing vs human writing ( https://arxiv.org/p
8.
▲
by
pajamasam
2mo ago
It contains four emdashes, it overuses the Rule of Three ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Signs_of_AI_writing#... ), it has the typical "not X, but Y" sentence, it unduly emphasizes the significance of
9.
▲
by
pajamasam
2mo ago
Kagi does something like this: https://blog.kagi.com/slopstop LinkedIn also added a button to report AI slop, but I'm doubtful it would be of much help on LinkedIn since every second post seems to be written by an LLM.
10.
▲
by
pajamasam
2mo ago
From the commits, it looks like it only took OP about 4 hours with Cursor.
11.
▲
by
pajamasam
2mo ago
Hmmm no, Meta is making money from businesses using their API.
12.
▲
by
pajamasam
4mo ago
And a single person's answer to a statistical phenomenon is going to help you how?
13.
▲
by
pajamasam
4mo ago
Interesting idea! A demo video would be great :)
14.
▲
by
pajamasam
4mo ago
1. They still make the data freely available. 2. Hosting the data is not free.
15.
▲
by
pajamasam
5mo ago
I honestly thought the whole thing was satire and that that line was a riff on OpenAI.
16.
▲
by
pajamasam
5mo ago
You think other CDNs are immune from the kinds of issues Cloudfare has?
17.
▲
by
pajamasam
5mo ago
> I wonder can you just set up fallback to origin in DNS Then you origin needs to be publicly accessible and you lose the DDOS protection that a CDN gives you. > All the other ones. They're just as susceptible to outages as Cloud
18.
▲
by
pajamasam
5mo ago
Anthropic says they may not train their models using your data, but apparently Persona (the service they will use for identity verification) WILL according to https://thelocalstack.eu/posts/linkedin-identity-verificatio
19.
▲
by
pajamasam
6mo ago
There are multiple good reasons to use a CDN though. What’s your suggestion for an alternative?
20.
▲
by
pajamasam
6mo ago
The article mentions some of the places use Yondr phone pouches.
21.
▲
Intel's Heracles chip computes fully-encrypted data without decrypting it
(tomshardware.com)
3 points
by
pajamasam
6mo ago
|
0 comments
22.
▲
by
pajamasam
6mo ago
Oh, I'm sure you have, mr bot
23.
▲
by
pajamasam
7mo ago
Not costless in terms of RAM though, surely?
24.
▲
by
pajamasam
7mo ago
Fair enough. How much RAM though?
25.
▲
by
pajamasam
7mo ago
> most of it is tied to performance, including new stock incentives linked to Waymo and its drone delivery venture Wing
26.
▲
by
pajamasam
7mo ago
This worked for me to get subdomains and TLS certificates working on a similar setup: https://blog.mni.li/posts/internal-tls-with-caddy/
27.
▲
by
pajamasam
7mo ago
Impressive that all that can run on one machine. Mind sharing the specs?
28.
▲
by
pajamasam
7mo ago
Also, they didn't say how accurate or secure it is.
29.
▲
by
pajamasam
7mo ago
I think that a what a lot of anti-AI folks are trying to argue without saying it explicitly is that it already is a systemic problem. They're not necessarily against the technology on its own, but against the systemic problems it would
30.
▲
by
pajamasam
7mo ago
Because greedy capitalists control the world which means that most people's most basic needs aren't met if they don't have a job.
More ›