8 ms·
Visible from space, Sudan's bloodied sands expose a massacre of thousands
- wslh 1y agohttps://archive.is/H0WYu https://archive.is/H0WYu
- prosper0 1y agoUAE backed RSF's doing.
- wslh 1y agoThere is another article on that topic: <https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/oct/31/sudans-latest-massacre-has-been-exposed-from-satellite-images-how-much-longer-can-the-world-look-away https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/oct/31/sudans-latest-...>
- dotancohen 1y ago[flagged]
- wslh 1y agoWhataboutism fallacy: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whataboutism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whataboutism
- tensor 1y agoThe silence from the west on what's going on in Sudan is deafening. It's a completely fair question to ask why, when people are so vocal for Palestine? Why not Sudan? Throwing out "whataboutism" every time someone dares ask a question like this is a fallacy in itself, intending to distract from the question of why genocide in places like Sudan are so thoroughly and utterly ignored and even buried.
- wslh 1y agoI agree with your first paragraph but I am following the principle of having the conversation around this specific HN topic on this post.
- JumpCrisscross 1y ago> It's a completely fair question to ask why, when people are so vocal for Palestine? Why not Sudan? The simple truth is a lot of, if not most, such vocalised outrage in any country is nine parts vanity. Remember #StopKony? About as effective for the people being harmed as students at Columbia barricading themselves into a building. I’m not sure I condemn moral vanity. It is a genuine intellectual exercise. But it’s one that doesn’t particularly benefit from repeat unless one seeks to become a student of atrocity, and one that has strong viral effects. What about the minority who actually try to help those harmed, e.g. by fundraising for victims or volunteering? They’re far and few in between. Moreover, their efforts benefit from economies of scale. As a result, in any community, the people actually being helpful will tend to pick their battles. And the people flipping out for fun will cluster around whatever is trendy to flip out about in public.
- nwienert 1y agoPeople tend to care a lot more about wars their country is funding.
- woooooo 1y agoBecause we dont fund or assist what's going on in Sudan? We have sanctions in place against the RSF rather than applauding their leaders in congress every year.
- shmageggy 1y ago> ...the United Arab Emirates (UAE) accused of backing the RSF with supplies and mercenaries... And also helping to launder Hemedti's gold via Dubai. https://globalwitness.org/en/campaigns/conflict-resources/exposing-rsfs-secret-financial-network/ https://globalwitness.org/en/campaigns/conflict-resources/ex...
- dzhiurgis 1y agoHow come dubai hasn’t experienced any sanctions yet? They’ve been laundering everything for ages, esp Russian oil. How are they so immune to this?
- JumpCrisscross 1y ago> How come dubai hasn’t experienced any sanctions yet? The UAE has crafted itself as a new Switzerland. (Qatar is trying to copy, but clumsily.) They buy American weapons and financial assets, making them influential. They’ve also established themselves as a logistics hub in an important logistics channel to the West and Asia. (They also pitch their balancing effect on Saudi Arabia skillfully.)
- nixass 1y ago> The UAE has crafted itself as a new Switzerland And whenever someone is talking fondly about UAE that's all you need to know about that person
- JumpCrisscross 1y ago> whenever someone is talking fondly about UAE that's all you need to know about that person I’ve heard that line about Qatar, Uruguay, Singapore, Malta, Cyprus, the Maldives, and countless other small states. I grew up in Switzerland. Folks like to compare themselves to us, mostly due to complete ignorance of our actual history and culture. It’s true in part and misses the point in others. Geopolitically, however, the observation is sound. Small states need a powerful protector far away or to balance their position between nearby large states. The latter only works in mountainous hellholes and on peninsulas (provided your larger neighbor(s) can’t blockade you; if they can, you need a foreign guarantor with a blue-water navy, of which historically there have only been one or two at a time). (You know Switzerland is a weapons exporter, right? To the U.S. But also to Qatar, Saudi Arabia and Hungary. One could almost say that folks who conclude intent from a place of ignorance communicate “all you need to know about” themselves.)
- MangoToupe 1y ago> When we go to see the Emirates, what number on our to-do list do you think Sudan is? It is not on our to-do list. What we have to do is keep the Emirates onside with Israel and onside against Iran. https://www.patreon.com/posts/radio-war-nerd-131258413 https://www.patreon.com/posts/radio-war-nerd-131258413
- JumpCrisscross 1y ago> What we have to do is keep the Emirates onside with Israel and onside against Iran This is so incredibly dumb. The UAE is a spigot of oil and money. (Secondarily, a massive buyer of American goods, services, weapons and financial assets.) Sudan isn’t on our to-do list because it doesn’t directly affect American voters. Oil prices and capital do.
- MangoToupe 1y agoI don't understand what you find dumb. Can you explain what you're disagreeing with? Do you think the money that the UAE offer precludes all other incentives to ignore mass slaughter? Surely by this metric we would be more allied with Venezuela than Israel. Or, perhaps, you have not fully articulated yourself.
- JumpCrisscross 1y agoIt’s dumb to frame every foreign policy issue through Israel. It’s simple. It will get views. But it’s dumb. > Do you think the money that the UAE offer precludes all other incentives to ignore mass slaughter? Precludes? No. Politically balanced. Absolutely. You’re not going to win votes promising higher oil prices and stalled construction projects to plant a moral flag in Africa so the guys backed by Iran, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Turkey win. Abu Dhabi is more than just geopolitically convenient.
- MangoToupe 1y ago> It’s dumb to frame every foreign policy issue through Israel. It’s simple. It will get views. But it’s dumb. Why? I get nothing from views, and much of our foreign policy is based around Israel, which serves the needs of our state in almost uncountable ways. Is it not just as dumb to ignore this? Acting as if our relationships with foreign countries appear in a vacuum seems.... absurd, to put it charitably.
- tipst 1y ago[flagged]
- vladgur 1y ago[flagged]
- jellojello 1y ago[flagged]
- vladgur 1y agoIs the best you can do a personal attack? Disagree with what i said? explain why. Attacking me personally shows your problems not mine.
- krapp 1y ago>I doubt we will hear "Death Death to the RSF" or demands to end the genocide in el-Fasher from the college kids and tik-tok influencers any time soon. You're probably right. It's unfortunate that acts of genocide like the one ongoing in Gaza need to go viral on social media for many Westerners to even be aware of them, much less care. Perhaps more effort should be put towards raising awareness of other genocides like the genocide in Gaza.
- TechSquidTV 1y agoYa you know the answer to that. Remember there are between 1 and 3 MILLION Muslim detainees in the Xinjiang internment camps in China.
- random9749832 1y ago"I am going to attempt to delegitimize the killing of children by acting like I care about this other conflict."
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- recroad 1y agoGTFO with that "real" genocide line. There are atrocities everywhere in this world. The difference is whether your country is funding it and providing political cover for it. In one case they are not, and in the other they are. In the case they are, there is legitimate and justified outrage.
- alephnerd 1y agoSadly, yet another bloody chapter of the Abu Dhabi (al Nahyan) - Doha (al Thani) feud that has been going on since the 2011 coup attempt [0], which itself is part of a longer multi-generational blood feud going on between the royal families [4]. The Middle East, North Africa, Central Asia, and Balkans are all burning because of this saga [1]. The UAE backs the RSF [2] (formerly known as the Janjaweed of the Darfur Genocide), and Qatar supports the Sudanese Army [3] [0] - https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/united-arab-emirates-palace-coup-foiled https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/united-arab-emirates-pala... [1] - https://lobelog.com/doha-and-abu-dhabis-incompatible-visions-for-the-arab-world/ https://lobelog.com/doha-and-abu-dhabis-incompatible-visions... [2] - https://www.wsj.com/world/how-u-a-e-arms-bolstered-a-sudanese-militia-accused-of-genocide-781b9803 https://www.wsj.com/world/how-u-a-e-arms-bolstered-a-sudanes... [3] - https://www.africaintelligence.com/eastern-africa-and-the-horn/2025/10/14/doha-s-discreet-military-support-for-sudanese-armed-forces,110533861-eve https://www.africaintelligence.com/eastern-africa-and-the-ho... [4] - https://gulfif.org/changing-alignments-in-the-lower-gulf/ https://gulfif.org/changing-alignments-in-the-lower-gulf/
- ch4s3 1y agoThe bargain the US has made with Qatar continues to prove itself as conceptually flawed and generally terrible. While the UAE deserves plenty of blame here, the Qataris are as usual up to their elbows in other people’s blood.
- JumpCrisscross 1y ago> bargain the US has made with Qatar continues to prove itself as conceptually flawed and generally terrible They buy our weapons and financial assets. We get base. I’m not sure we’ve ever particularly cared about what anyone is up to in Africa. Yemen became of interest because it was fucking with the Red Sea.
- ch4s3 1y agoDestabilizing the region, working with Hamas, facilitating terror financing, working with Iran, and a bunch of other stuff should concern us. There’s plenty of flat sand to park aircraft on without doing business with those filthy slavers.
- hi41 1y ago[flagged]
- lukan 1y ago"However, those European countries haven’t acknowledged or apologized for what they have done." Not completely and not for everything, but largely it is at least recognized. I mean, I learned about it and how bad it all was in a ordinary european school. What you say implies it is like in turkey, where they don't tell students in school what happened in Armenia. Or like in china, where even the knowledge gets removed. (I think Japan also largely choose not to reevaluate its glorious bloody empire past) So blaming every war in Africa on the colonial past is maybe not helpful, when there have been wars before european involvement. And especially here, to me it seems a inner muslim/arab war. Different factions backed by different arabic states. UAE and Quatar. What exactly is the european involvment here?
- random9749832 1y ago[flagged]
- ceejayoz 1y agoIt’s almost like hundreds of years of damage takes a bit to undo.
- random9749832 1y agoYou realise that the whole world has suffered through tons of atrocities right? Should we go through the history of India, China, Cambodia...
- bonsai_spool 1y agoI mean, each of the countries you cited (India, China, Cambodia - formerly part of ‘Indochine’) had very well known colonial mistreatment… not sure if you were aware
- jmyeet 1y agoAs always, conflicts are much easier to understand when viewed through the lens of materialism. Factors such as ethnicity or religion are never the reason for these conflicts. Those are simply the excuse. It’s what’s used to fuel the fire. The heart of this conflict is Sudan’s gold that’s laundered via Dubai then Switzerland. The culpability of Western powers including the US cannot be ignored either. The RSF is supplied with diverted arms shipments from the West to the UAE. Just like in Gaza the US could stop this at any time with a phone call.
- JumpCrisscross 1y ago> Factors such as ethnicity or religion are never the reason for these conflicts Economics motivates. But these divisions dominate in determining magnitude. You don’t need genocide to control mines, farms and oil fields. (You need labour.) The dial turns from enslavement to extermination when there is deep-rooted fury. That sort of fury can really only be channeled on divisions of race and religion. (You need a way for poorly-trained, uneducated troops to mostly reliably identify the enemy.) > heart of this conflict is Sudan’s gold Why not oil, too? > Just like in Gaza the US could stop this at any time with a phone call This hubris fuels our forever wars, both in trade and militarily. We don’t have that influence. If we tried restricting both Qatar and the UAE in Africa, we’d put serious economic and military interests at stake. Interests American voters care about enough that our leaders have even less free rein than our geopolitical limits circumscribe.
- casey2 1y agoSo Arabs fly planes into the world trade center, commit mass genocide at darfur and are still support this dude and his band of thugs with their colonialist rape of Africa? The US could drop a nuke on UAE and tell them to stop funding colonialist expansion. The war against evil is never ending playing nice is a fools game.
- lazide 1y agoYou know if we nuked the UAE, everyone would just start funding the folks that make Hamas seem like the church social committee right?
- exe34 1y agoI'm constantly impressed that we are a civilisation that can look down from space and see this kind of barbarism.
- PeaceTed 1y agoHaving a foot in both the future and the past. Or at least I wish it were in the past.
- lazide 1y agoMurder is timeless (apparently).
- elephant81 1y agoYes, the ISS as a sadistic Christof
- Configure0251 1y ago“The future is already here – it's just not evenly distributed.”
- card_zero 1y ago"Visible from space" used to mean "by astronauts". If high-resolution sensors are allowed, then the term applies to things like a tree and a car, and doesn't signify much. Well, maybe it signifies that nobody wants to go and take photos in person.
- tbrownaw 1y ago> Well, maybe it signifies that nobody wants to go and take photos in person. That sounds slow and expensive.
- freddie_mercury 1y ago"Analysis by the Yale School of Public Health Humanitarian Research Lab (HRL), which has been tracking the siege using open source images and satellite imagery, found clusters of objects “consistent with the size of human bodies” and “reddish ground discolouration” thought to be either blood or disturbed soil." The "visible from space" here is clearly dumb click bait from The Telegraph.
- RemainsOfTheDay 1y ago[dead]
- culi 1y agoJust wanna plug the most thorough and useful video I've seen on the history of this conflict. The US, Russia, and many other players are more heavily involved in this conflict than is often discussed in media. It breaks down the specific ways many international players are profiting from the conflict and helps makes sense of the motives driving it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gqIMES53rsY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gqIMES53rsY
- Wazzymandias 1y agoIt's not a conflict, it's a genocide
- culi 1y agoYes ofc. The RSF is just the rebranded Janjaweed which were legally classified as having committed genocide. But they never faced any international consequences and here they are committing genocide once again. It's also a major conflict though as the SAF is the major oppositional force fighting against the RSF. SAF was the military that took control after a democratic revolution pushed out the dictator Omar al-Bashir
- anukin 1y ago[flagged]
- isr 1y ago[flagged]
- monooso 1y agoThis is entirely false. The UN clearly defines [1] genocide as (emphasis mine): > ...any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group... [1]: https://www.un.org/en/genocide-prevention/definition https://www.un.org/en/genocide-prevention/definition
- culi 1y agoSudan is the 3rd largest producer of gold in Africa but it remains the poorest country in Africa because the companies that exploit those resources are never Sudanese. The RSF got their weapons by acting as mercenaries for the UAE to fight against the Houthis in Yemen. Fighting as a mercenary is pretty much the only reliable source of income for many people in the country.
- cm2012 1y agoModern Belgian congo
- prox 1y agoFrom wikipedia : On examination of photos and videos of weapons used in the conflict that were posted on social media, the rights group identified that companies registered in China, Iran, Russia, Serbia, and the UAE were associated with the weapons provided to RSF.[96] Human Rights Watch reviewed images of show crates with markings indicating they were manufactured in 2020 and initially acquired by the UAE Armed Forces in through a contract with Adasi, a subsidiary of UAE-based weapons manufacturer Edge Group. A January 2024 report by the UN Panel of Experts on Sudan deemed the UAE's alleged support to the RSF as "credible" According to Business Insider, "The two generals helped Russian President Vladimir Putin exploit Sudan's gold resources to help buttress Russian finances against Western sanctions and fund his war in Ukraine."[108]
- culi 1y agoYes, to clarify the primary international players: Russia: initially supported the RSF, then at one point was trading with both sides, and in 2024/2025 fully switched sides to back the SAF Iran: stayed out of it until 2024 when it finally backed the SAF which caused a major turning point in the conflict UAE/the US: the main player responsible for RSF's rise. It hired out RSF mercenaries to fight the Houthis in Yemen. At one point there were more than 40,000 RSF mercenaries (mostly between the ages of 14-17) in Yemen. It continues to be the primary funder of the RSF Israel: the RSF buys surveillance tech and weapons from Israel Saudi Arabia: the largest smuggler of (illegally acquired) gold from RSF. A major source of funding for the RSF China: doesn't directly deal with either side but Chinese-made weapons were found in the hands of the RSF mostly through the UAE reselling them. The SAF also has some Chinese made weapons through Russia and Turkey tl;dr: it's a very complex disaster but international players simply don't have an interest in ending it. The SAF is the main opposition to the genocidal RSF, but they are also uninterested in maintaining the democracy that the people fought for and the sides backing the SAF (mostly Iran, and now Russia) are likely hoping to continue their exploitation of gold if they defeat the RSF
- fortran77 1y agoI presume there will be protests at Columbia University?
- ngruhn 1y ago[flagged]
- anukin 1y agoIt’s the religion not the color that’s the factor. If oppressor belongs to a certain religion it’s all kosher. If the roles reverse it’s genocide.
- shigawire 1y agoIt's because the US clearly is the main supporter of Israel who is the Goliath in that conflict. In Sudan the US is not clearly propping up one side. People are reasonably more mad in the US about Gaza since their taxes directly fund it and the US seemingly could exert influence on Israel if there was political will. It is not clear how the US would improve Sudan without wading into some massive peacekeeping / reconstruction mission - which no one has the appetite for.
- ricardobeat 1y agoI take it that’s supposed to be funny. Most people have absolutely zero agency over what happens beyond their own city’s borders, proclaiming your views loudly in public is one of the very few ways you can influence society.
- TacticalCoder 1y ago[dead]
- parineum 1y agoAgree or disagree this post is clearly about which genocide they choose to protest.
- inshard 1y ago[flagged]
- MangoToupe 1y agoIt's worth noting there are islamists on both side. Anyone who characterizes this as purely religious or ethnic has a bridge to sell. This conflict would have died years ago if it weren't for foreign actors putting their hands up Sudan's ass
- ngruhn 1y agoThe number of violent conflicts initiated by various islamist groups is insane [1]. There is something wrong here that goes beyond funding. It's possible to acknowledge that without being islamophobic. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ongoing_armed_conflicts https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ongoing_armed_conflict...
- MMAesawy 1y agoThe heatmap may as well represent a map of recently decolonized areas with unresolved political issues, and just so happens that many of these places have significant Muslim populations.
- lazide 1y agoIf you read the Koran and Hadiths, there are numerous statements about the true Muslims duty being to spread Islam - at the point of the sword being a well supported one, scripture wise. Abu Bakr [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu_Bakr https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu_Bakr] and even Mohammed himself [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_expeditions_of_Muhammad https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_expeditions_of_Muhamma...]. It has never been a particularly ‘turn the other cheek’ religion.
- culi 1y ago[flagged]
- pols45 1y agoJust enough funding to view suffering. No funding to end it.
- horns4lyfe 1y agoWhat do you want to do? Send in troops from somewhere else to die too?
- culi 1y agoWell we are currently sending funding. Except that funding is going to further the conflict. Sudan's gold reserves are critical materials. The previous dictator, Omar al-Bashir, was propped up by foreign powers exactly because they allowed those countries to extract the gold reserves. The RSF is the same thing. they are the evolution of the Janjaweed militias that the ICC found to be committing genocide. The international community did nothing to stop them or hold them accountable so they are once again committing genocide. International players want this to continue. Russia was at some point funding both sides and sending in Wagner mercenaries. UAE has been funding the RSF since the very start and continues to be the largest importer of (illegal) gold. Israel benefits because the RSF is a major importer of its surveillance tech as well as weapons. Both Israel and the US fund the UAE despite knowing that the UAE is fueling the RSF because they both ultimately benefit. American and even Chinese weapons have been found on both sides (mostly through the UAE reselling weapons to the RSF). Even if the SAF wins, it'll just be another military junta whose top priority is to exploit the gold reserves to the benefit of whichever nation is funding it and NOT giving any of that wealth back to the people.
- crises-luff-6b 1y ago[dead]
- helicone 1y ago'Visible from space' loses its bite when you see they're using cameras that can practically read your mail from space. Yes, this is terrible, but atrocities like this happen all over Africa on a daily basis for innumerable reasons, and Sudan specifically has been in civil wars longer than I have been alive. The piece's structure: 'look at how terrible this is, don't you just feel soooo bad?' + 'by the way the UAE has been accused of facilitating this' signals to me that the writer is primarily motivated by a desire to make the UAE and all muslims by comparison look bad. Notice how they focus on the atrocities by the RSF, ignoring the fact that all sides in this war are complicit in slaughter. America, Europe, Russia, China, and their satellite countries have been starting and fueling wars in Africa since before these countries became independent. They deliberately draw borders that cut ethnic populations and religious groups in half. They flood these regions with weapons and mercenaries. They replace incentives to develop stable societies, robust agricultural industries, and infrastructure with 'just good enough to survive' aid. They bribe local warlords with collective billions of dollars. Global power blocs have effectively enforced a continent of lawlessness where you're only safe from war in the immediate vicinity of resource extraction sites, and lucky for you those sites are the kinds of places small children handle mercury without PPE and die of exhaustion and chemical burns. All of this to give you fiber optic cables. Yes, the UAE is complicit, but so are you if you're reading this. This is not a 'muslim' problem. This is not a 'UAE' problem. This is a structural problem driven primarily by increasing population, materialist consumer habits, and the geopolitical reality that if any bloc stopped doing all of this horrible stuff the only outcome would be that the other blocs get a bigger share. This article is not written with the intention of solving these problems, it is written with the intention of keeping you just angry enough to do what they tell you, without making you so angry that you replace the ones making these decisions.
- ada1981 1y agoThis is horrible but I feel like the "visible" from space headline is becoming increasingly less impressive as satellite imagery becomes more impressive. You could say, I drink so much coffee it's visible from space and it's literally just a coffee mug sitting on a park bench.
- fsckboy 1y agoideology plays little role in these conflicts, they are partially religio-ethnic but mostly about pure power, where religion and ethnicity are levers pulled to leverage power. the people seeking power would sell out their own mothers if that's what it took. the ideologies here are the ideologies of the HN commenters who try to fit the facts into their predetermined narratives. and "visible from space" means absolutely nothing meaningful. can we read license plates from space or not yet? I don't know, but in this context, who cares (way back in the 1980s a china-zealot was telling me that the Great Wall of China was "the only manmade thing visible from space." I had the presence of mind to say back, "isn't it more significant to be able to get to space to see what's visible?")
- haritha-j 1y agoThis is truly horrible and I don't want to detract from the original aim of the article, but can we just establish that 'visible' from space doesn't really mean much anymore given the resolution of satellites? My garage is also visible from space, doesn't make it worthy of a headline.
- tsoukase 1y agoWestern governments prefer to earn a day's income than sacrifice a whole African tribe since the last centuries up until now. So, no wonders Sudan felt in a hell hole where intertwined interests take place. Only the public outcry through mass media can stop a genocide which in this case does not sell. After a few years the balance of power will settle and may be a movie will be produced, like Hotel Rwanda.
- shadyKeystrokes 1y ago[dead]
- honkostani 1y ago[flagged]
- jama211 1y agoThe idea that “western intervention” is the only thing that stops these from occurring is so ignorant and rooted in racism I don’t know where to begin.
- honkostani 1y ago[flagged]
- jama211 1y agoWow, you’re off the deep end mate.
- hshdhdhj4444 1y ago[flagged]
- gaanbal 1y ago[flagged]
- nsoonhui 1y agoNot sure why you are being downvoted, but you are exactly right. The October 7 massacre passed with barely any notice in much of the Western world. Yet the moment Israel responded to recover the hostages—if not earlier—there were already demonstrations everywhere against so-called Israeli “atrocities.” It appears the world only pays attention when Jews are involved. An estimated 500,000 children have died from malnutrition alone since the Sudan conflict began in 2023[0]. Do you see people in Paris, Washington, or New York demanding an end to that conflict? We have not even accounted for deaths caused directly by the fighting. Even with regard to the war in Gaza, Hamas’ use of human shields[1] has resulted in significant civilian casualties, yet all condemnation is directed at the IDF, which attempts to avoid civilian deaths, including by dropping leaflets before airstrikes[2]. No one seems to care that Hamas—the elected government of Gaza—is deliberately placing civilians in harm’s way in a war it initiated. Instead, the criticism overwhelmingly targets Israel for civilian deaths caused by Hamas’ human-shield strategy. [0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Famine_in_Sudan_(2024%E2%80%93present) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Famine_in_Sudan_(2024%E2%80%93... [1]: https://stratcomcoe.org/cuploads/pfiles/hamas_human_shields.pdf https://stratcomcoe.org/cuploads/pfiles/hamas_human_shields.... [2]: https://edition.cnn.com/2023/11/16/middleeast/israel-leaflets-evacuate-south-gaza-hamas-intl https://edition.cnn.com/2023/11/16/middleeast/israel-leaflet...
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- 0xedd 1y ago[dead]
- genecidewatch 1y ago[dead]
- JamesAdir 1y agoSo strange that I haven’t seen global coverage of this crisis on a daily basis, or demonstrations for “Free Sudan” on campuses. If anyone has a theory about why this humanitarian disaster doesn’t receive the same attention as Gaza, which didn't have such events, please feel free to share.