bonsai_spool

4 ms·

1.
by bonsai_spool 5d ago
> agreed but that is not what they are talking about banning I think you misunderstand me. I think what is proposed to be banned (employers of doctors who are PE firms) should not exist. It is strictly not necessary, and there's an
2.
by bonsai_spool 5d ago
> Venture capital has been essential for progress in medicine VC's can still fund companies that are making expensive new products. Banks (and PE...) can still underwrite loans for these things. We have many solutions for capex-int
3.
by bonsai_spool 6d ago
It's inane, actually - I thought this might be something put on by an Allen Institute or some actually well-respected organization.
4.
by bonsai_spool 6d ago
This is a collection of pet projects by folks who are not distinguished biologists. Interesting, maybe, but not to be placed on the same pedestal as the mathematics Millenium Prize of a similar name. Arguably, the origin of life is a questi
5.
by bonsai_spool 9d ago
Yes! It also exists on iOS, where it’s possible to play both brown/white/pink/fire/seaside noise at the same time as other media
6.
by bonsai_spool 11d ago
The program started two weeks ago
7.
by bonsai_spool 12d ago
> How clear is it when I google a recipe and get an AI-generated recipe Recipes can’t be copyrighted Here’s one discussion about this https://www.nycbar.org/reports/secret-ingredients-how-to-pro...
8.
by bonsai_spool 12d ago
These statements would suggest that the precedent is not, in fact, clear
9.
by bonsai_spool 12d ago
> Precedent is pretty clear: What cases are you citing when you say this?
10.
by bonsai_spool 15d ago
Unaffiliated with this project but I enjoy Claude Code Usage on my Mac https://github.com/richhickson/claudecodeusage
11.
by bonsai_spool 15d ago
I don't think you can fix the Claude tells without rewriting everything on your own - but I do read/write a lot for work, so I think about voice a lot. Here's a handful of sentences that I feel a human would not have used but
12.
by bonsai_spool 15d ago
Very cool site! It's got some Claude-isms but they're not overwhelming which leads me to wonder: how did the author get the overall aesthetic to be so un-Claude-like?
13.
by bonsai_spool 16d ago
Fair enough, it seems the watch would be an 'intercepting device' and thus all parties would need to agree for any party to use the device for the summary function.
14.
by bonsai_spool 16d ago
> This is, I believe, a felony in Massachusetts. I hear this a lot but such a perspective elides the novelty (and the actual question): If I devise a mechanical device that semi-faithfully creates marks that convey information about a co
15.
by bonsai_spool 16d ago
> The set of who can actually use this is pretty much null as it is. You cannot use it in a publication [...] "You can *publish*, share and adapt output in accordance with the Terms, including the requirement to provide clear notice
16.
by bonsai_spool 17d ago
What does the agreement say? Again, this is exactly what these products are designed for and what they’re used to do in publications
17.
by bonsai_spool 17d ago
> Beyond the DNA we have the symptoms and lab work and I can usually narrow it down to a handful of guesses, but it sure would be nice to use this to help rank where to invest efforts. This is exactly what the various DeepMind products h
18.
by bonsai_spool 18d ago
> benchmark labels came from conservation And from human disease...?
19.
by bonsai_spool 18d ago
This may not be anything new but it makes using several Google/DeepMind resources a lot less painful. I'm comfortable programming but others who also do mol bio may be less so or may not recognize when Claude is going off the rail
20.
by bonsai_spool 19d ago
Just for improved thinnness; they're able to reduce about 2 mm from the thickness with the pins (and you can still technically use them for data transfer depending on how it's wired to the SoC).
21.
by bonsai_spool 19d ago
> proprietary magnetic adapter They're supposedly not proprietary but a standard size that's easily replaced.
22.
by bonsai_spool 27d ago
When one conducts research, she selects a setting where an outcome is likely to be visible. For new drug approvals, one selects patients who are as sick as reasonably attainable (ie before unrelated secondary effects arise) The fact that th
23.
by bonsai_spool 27d ago
This is junk both-sides-ism. I wasted minutes waiting for the delivery of reasonable studies that support and oppose daycare but ended up seeing the authors repeat the trope of dismissing studies of hundreds of participants wtihout trying t
24.
by bonsai_spool 1mo ago
> misread the original comment By pointing out that it is true using a reference? > the reply The reply misunderstood the first comment and went on to discuss something a)interesting but b) not germane to whether melanoma is the skin
25.
by bonsai_spool 1mo ago
> not really a huge win. It's going to cost taxpayers significancy and may not improve survival much or total life expectancy . The stock is way overextended. It's a long way from anything that can be used on patients, assuming
26.
by bonsai_spool 1mo ago
> Individualized immune cancer therapy has been touted as the next big thing for half a century. It's nothing new, and with few exceptions, such as skin cancer, has failed to yield much. scientists, for decades, have tired to harne
27.
by bonsai_spool 1mo ago
Please be careful and charitable in reading others' words, especially as they relate to scientific topics. OP did not say that melanoma has no sun exposure risk but that it is lower than the risks associated with other cutaneous cancer
28.
by bonsai_spool 1mo ago
I really would love to see the sources you have on this. As someone who has been in medicine for decades now, I have never hears this. This may be the result of a game of telephone but I'll comment as I can: > The AMA orchestrated t
29.
by bonsai_spool 1mo ago
> It was a high deductible insurance plan Why do you believe that the ACA would have wanted such plans cancelled? There's a very straightforward public health reason that's reminiscent of why states require drivers to have car
30.
by bonsai_spool 1mo ago
> except the AMA What an idle comment - where is the AMA on record saying that we should spend more on healthcare? Here's all the work they do to describe our increasing costs: https://www.ama-assn.org/about/ama

More ›