17 ms·
Unpredictable abilities emerging from large AI models
- m3kw9 4y agoSurprised not many movies had stories about generative AI
- DeathArrow 4y agoI used ChatGPT to generate erotic stories. Now I want a model which can produce porn videos from prompts.
- neets 4y agoI am excited to live inside my anime Haram hentai
- Traubenfuchs 4y agoWe all are. Some want porn of Emma Watson, some want porn of werewolves and some just want to see porn of their ex. And soon we are all gonna get what we want. That‘s the silver lining to the massive job destruction that is to come.
- DeathArrow 4y ago> We all are. Some want porn of Emma Watson, some want porn of werewolves and some just want to see porn of their ex. And soon we are all gonna get what we want. I'm fine with a young Jenna Jameson. The identity of the actors doesn't matter much.
- frankfrankfrank 4y agoWell, it seems like the answer to what to do with all the useless people. Some had said drugs and video games, but I’m sure that custom VR porn dens will work too.
- DeathArrow 4y agoGive me some beer and custom porn. I will still find some time to come to HN and remember the times when programmers were useful.
- WalterSear 4y agoYou'll squabble over the refuse that the AI-owning corporate masters donate to us, and like it.
- Traubenfuchs 4y agoWhat useful thing are you doing to call others useless?
- tarruda 4y ago[dead]
- BiteCode_dev 4y agoGive it 2 years, it will happen, and it will make billions. In 5 years, unlimited interactive NSFW video games that will be personalized and remember you.
- cosmodisk 4y agoIn 10 years this could effectively be the end of Hollywood. Imagine if it can write a story and feed into 3d engine and output pitch perfect videos.
- BiteCode_dev 4y agoUnlimited fully tailored netflix and steam.
- freilanzer 4y agoThe Dopamine Machine.
- codyb 4y agoSounds like TikTok or am I missing something? I'm not on social media (I guess I'm here on occasion), but it just sounds like a feed of shit to consume... Would it really be that much better than what we've got now?
- jamiek88 4y agoTikTok is scary addictive but it’s not perfectly addictive. This could be close to wireheading. As someone with severe ADHD and a brain surgery I am super susceptible to this and have to be very careful. Hackernews is addictive enough.
- idiotsecant 4y agoIt absolutely will be the end of 'turn the crank and out comes a mediocre film we can put into a red box and make a few million off of' It's unlikely it will produce works that are doing new things and creating new styles because currently all AI has one thing in common - it's very good at replicating existing ideas and performing style transfer to blend those ideas. It's going to get better at those things but there's no reason to think that it will be truly creative in the sense of creating something that isn't a style transfer in the near future. What it will do is create an incredibly low entry barrier to making truely creative work with a human in the toolchain at the highest levels of abstraction. You won't need to pay a team of actors and stage hands and audio people and editors etc. You'll be able to make world class cinema with a desktop PC and an AWS account. It'll probably result in a massive explosion of content (both good and terrible). Once we create an AI that can be truly creative in the way specified above, I think it's about time for biological humanity to accept that our time as the most advanced intelligence in our little corner of the universe is over.
- epups 4y agoMicrosoft will start sending you very interesting targeted ads
- ur-whale 4y agoDude, you just hit on how to build the next youporn YC 2024?
- nirav72 4y agoI want ChatGPT style generative output to be used in games. For example - instead of standard flow based dialogs that are used for interacting with in-game NPCs - it would be neat to see them use a dynamically generated dialog based on player input. Albeit, maybe limited in scope. Imagine in a online RPG, a player interacts with a NPC. Then goes away. Another player comes along talks to the same NPC, the NPC can then recall and use the previous interaction with another the other player as context in the current interaction. Eventually, I think we would start seeing some weird emergent behavior in games.
- m3kw9 4y agoTraining a model that outputs video like stable difussion is still cost prohibitive, never mind the models are not there yet to that that well with even testing purposes
- DFXLuna 4y agoHave you tried KoboldAI? It can run, among other more mundane things, some pretty large ERP models. Its been making me lose sleep this week. :D
- drdeca 4y agoHuh; I had assumed it would refuse to do that?
- bryanrasmussen 4y ago>“That language models can do these sort of things was never discussed in any literature that I’m aware of," I had previously the expectation that unpredictable emergent behavior would exist in any sufficiently complex system? Based on layman's readings in chaos and complexity theory.
- PeterisP 4y ago> I had previously the expectation that unpredictable emergent behavior would exist in any sufficiently complex system? Yes and no. It's reasonable to expect that some unpredictable emergent behavior would exist in any sufficiently complex system, but it's not warranted to expect whether a particular capability will or will not emerge out of that system (that's the unexpected emergent behavior part); and it also was debated whether language models are a "sufficiently complex system", as many thinkers asserted that they should encounter fundamental limits in capabilities.
- glenstein 4y agoSame here. I don't think it's surprising, but depending on where you say it, you'll find people insisting that this can't be possible. I think a lot of our widely held cultural beliefs on this front have been informed by academic philosophy from the 60s, 70s, and 80s. In particular, I would go do far as to say that Hubert Dreyfus, author of the book "What computers can't do" and frequent friendly adversary of Daniel Dennett, has a lot of responsibility here. He is famous for claiming computers would never become competitive at chess because chess required "insight", and always differentiated computer capabilities from complex behavior or human-like behavior, because the latter had something special that could only be represented with vague and underdefined terms. Even now I think Dreyfus is approvingly cited, while his core thesis is getting closer to being refuted every day if it hasn't been already.
- AlanYx 4y agoOne thing that LLMs have made me realize is just how ungrounded a lot of mainstream academic philosophy was in the 70s and 80s. For example, so much of Derrida's work centered around the impossibility of truly communicating shared meaning between individuals through language. The fact that we can now communicate so effectively (with remarkably few contextual errors and razor-sharp conveyance of intent) with an entity/technology that is not even human pretty much destroys so much of Derrida's oeuvre as false and delusionally solipsistic, basically just a silly game. He had his critics who argued the same thing, especially analytical philosophers, but they never had as much purchase as he did in the academy.
- sublinear 4y agoFrom the review comments... > Key Weakness: The paper largely focuses on showing how much emergence occurs in a “sudden” manner, bringing reports from previous work. It relies on the “magic” of emergence, rather than providing new insights on why this is happening and when it happens/does not happen. > Requested change: More fundamental evidence on the claim "further scaling will likely endow even-larger language models with new emergent abilities" with more concrete discussion (with possibly evidence) on how those new emergent abilities would look like and how further scaling will be possibly in a approachable way.
- novaRom 4y agoBasic statistical relations in observable world (on Human-Level scale) should somehow be reflected in human language and in mathematics. Deeper models tend to learn those relations, and produce good looking connections which fit in the realm of possible "thoughts" perfectly.
- interdrift 4y agoIn the past few days I've been shellshocked by GPT-4. I'm still and believe I will be for the near future.
- pedrovhb 4y agoThis caught my attention as I found it implausible: > One DeepMind engineer even reported being able to convince ChatGPT that it was a Linux terminal and getting it to run some simple mathematical code to compute the first 10 prime numbers. Remarkably, it could finish the task faster than the same code running on a real Linux machine. Following the link, there's a screenshot to a screenshot [0] of a code-golf solution to finding primes which is quite inefficient, and the author notes > I want to note here that this codegolf python implementation to find prime numbers is very inefficient. It takes 30 seconds to evaluate the command on my machine, but it only takes about 10 seconds to run the same command on ChatGPT. So, for some applications, this virtual machine is already faster than my laptop. So it's not quite calculating primes; more likely it recognizes the code as being code to do so, and recites the numbers from memory. That's interesting in its own right, but we won't be running Python on an LLM for a performance boost any time soon. In my experience this interpreting is apparent as a limitation of the model when it keeps insisting on broken code being correct, or having its mistake pointed out, then apologizing, saying it's got some new code that fixes the issue, and proceeding to output the exact same code. [0] https://www.engraved.blog/content/images/2022/12/image-13.png https://www.engraved.blog/content/images/2022/12/image-13.pn...
- namaria 4y agoSo on the one hand, these newly publicized models can render convincing representations of realities we used to get from deterministic processes. On the other hand, it's probabilistic and fails to conform to logic quite often, and in a confident way. We're building systems capable of programing computers non-deterministically. I think this is huge. But not because ChatGPT23 will be a CEO or a politician. But because this is a paradigm shift in compute similar to moving from integrator machines to general computers. I don't think LLMs will make programmers obsolete. I think large enough models will make programming something completely different from what it is now. The days of sequencing tokens for compilers/interpreters seem to be drawing to an end as the dominant way of specifying software products.
- tosser0001 4y agoI'm sort of glad to be retiring soon. I have a feeling everything I enjoy about programming is going to be going away.
- pajko 4y agoI've asked ChatGPT to write an ode to the beer. This was the result: An ode to the frothy brew, The one that's crisp and true, A beer that's cool and light, The perfect drink for a summer's night. With every sip, a burst of hops, A refreshing taste that never stops, The gentle fizz, the golden hue, A symphony of flavors brewed just for you. Whether you're at a party or alone, A refreshing beer is like coming home, It's familiar and comforting, calming and pure, A tonic for the soul that's simply pure. So let's raise a glass to the brew, The lager or ale, your favorite or new, For no matter the type or brand, A refreshing beer is always grand.
- danielbln 4y agoI asked GPT-4 to take this ode and make it rhyme better, and to make it more clever and beautiful: A sonnet to the effervescent ale, The potion crisp, sincere, and hale, A quaff that's chilled and full of light, The ambrosia for a summer's twilight. With every draught, a surge of hop, A zestful taste that will not stop, The subtle fizz, the amber glow, A panoply of notes that flow. In festive throngs or solitaire, A bracing brew brings comfort there, It's known and soothing, mending, clear, A balm for hearts, a joy austere. So let's extol the sudsy cheer, The stout or porter, far or near, For in each varied draft or blend, A lively beer shall ever mend.
- groestl 4y agoI read that with a British accent and was delighted when I reached this line: "In festive throngs or solitaire, A bracing brew brings comfort there, It's known and soothing, mending, clear, A balm for hearts, a joy austere." Reminded me of a way historians find out how written text was spoken (namely by looking at what supposedly rhymes or onomatopoeic words and letters).
- danielbln 4y agoYou'll enjoy this AI generated spoken version: https://on.soundcloud.com/1tHgY https://on.soundcloud.com/1tHgY
- recuter 4y agoThe other, less sensational possibility, she said, is that what appears to be emergent may instead be the culmination of an internal, statistics-driven process that works through chain-of-thought-type reasoning. Large LLMs may simply be learning heuristics that are out of reach for those with fewer parameters or lower-quality data. But, she said, finding out which of those explanations is more likely hinges on a better understanding of how LLMs work at all. “Since we don’t know how they work under the hood, we can’t say which of those things is happening.”
- mmaunder 4y agoThere is a startling acceleration of innovation in the field that GPT-4 illustrates. According to NVidia, LLM sizes have been increasing 10X per year for the last few years. This tech is going to hit every aspect of society like a sledgehammer over the next 48 months.
- curiousgal 4y agoI guess you perception of society is severely limited if you think a fancy autocomplete is capable of changing every aspect of it.
- maxdoop 4y agoI have fun on these HN chats responding to comments like yours . It’s just fancy auto complete to you? You honestly can’t see the capability it has and extend it the future? What’s that saying about “it’s hard to get someone to understand something when their salary depends on their not understanding it”.
- HervalFreire 4y ago[flagged]
- _dain_ 4y ago> When these LLMs get normalized probably 5 years from now I'm going go back to these old threads and contact these people who are in self denial and throw it in their face. I'll just link this comment and be like I TOLD YOU, I TOLD YOU, YOU WERE WRONG. this isn't a kind thing to do.
- HervalFreire 4y ago[flagged]
- Jeff_Brown 4y agoNor rational. What a strange impulse.
- calf 4y agoSo they quote an expert who says there's a distinction between bona fide novel structures and states, versus statistical heuristics that benefit from the scaling. Meanwhile, yet people claim ChatGPT has learned this or that capability, and it is true "by inspection". Recent findings like these suggest at least two possibilities for why emergence occurs, said Ellie Pavlick, a computer scientist at Brown University who studies computational models of language. One is that, as suggested by comparisons to biological systems, larger models truly do gain new abilities spontaneously. “It may very well be that the model has learned something fundamentally new and different that it didn’t have at a smaller size,” she said. “That’s what we’re all hoping is the case, that there’s some fundamental shift that happens when models are scaled up.” The other, less sensational possibility, she said, is that what appears to be emergent may instead be the culmination of an internal, statistics-driven process that works through chain-of-thought-type reasoning. Large LLMs may simply be learning heuristics that are out of reach for those with fewer parameters or lower-quality data. But, she said, finding out which of those explanations is more likely hinges on a better understanding of how LLMs work at all. “Since we don’t know how they work under the hood, we can’t say which of those things is happening.”
- Madmallard 4y agoI'm still convinced I'll be able to get GPT4 to solve all these difficult problems for me that I'm having trouble solving on my own. So far it hasn't been so great at doing it, but it's fun to at least try. For context I'm trying to get it to help me learn how to implement scalable multiplayer game servers in NodeJS. It's a tough code organization problem, it becomes a tough system design problem as well the bigger your game gets. I'm just simply not experienced enough at that specific stuff. I'd also like to use it to help me learn all the technology I haven't learned since becoming disabled 5 years ago, like React Redux Material-UI and more.
- ChatGTP 4y agoIt's probably going to struggle with things it hasn't seen before?
- ur-whale 4y ago> It's probably going to struggle with things it hasn't seen before? It wont. It'll just lie through its teeth and produce a very nice, very believable story which will unfortunately shatter when confronted with the real world.
- calvinmorrison 4y agobig 4 consultants in SHAMBLES right now
- tel 4y agoI've asked it to design novel architectures. It has vast experience with existing systems, can be steered toward your goals, and writes simple prototype code more quickly than I can. I run into the current context window pretty quickly and have been working on techniques to ask it to "compress" our conversation to work around that context window. The whole thing about creativity is that it often begins with lying through your teeth to come up with a starting point and then refining.
- thequadehunter 4y ago
- ishvanl 4y agoThere is an idea bouncing around my brain for a pipe-dream science fiction book I could write, about the rise of the first truly sentient (or sentient-appearing) AI & its effects on the world. It is beginning to get to the point where I am considering whether I need to actually start writing this book before this "sci-fi" concept becomes a mundane reality.
- ChatGTP 4y agoEr, doesn't "ChatGPT4" (quotes) get to write all the novels now?
- psychphysic 4y agoGo meta and make ChatGPT write it for you. There's a lot of work involved in book and chapter plans, as well as bios so you're not getting off lightly. But chatGPT would be able to make a first draft for you for sure.
- ben_w 4y ago> It is beginning to get to the point where I am considering whether I need to actually start writing this book before this "sci-fi" concept becomes a mundane reality. Yes, write your book. I've been trying to fix the dramatic conflict in mine for the last few years (spare time) without much progress, and mine has a specific calendar year backed into it.
- oldgradstudent 4y ago> It is beginning to get to the point where I am considering whether I need to actually start writing this book before this "sci-fi" concept becomes a mundane reality. No need to rush. If that moment arrives, you could just change the Amazon category from fiction to nonfiction.
- layer8 4y agoI’m looking forward to the “alternative history” SF novels of the future where AGI never materialized.
- 4y ago
- ur-whale 4y agoThis is nice and swell, but my experience with GPT-4 is that it lies. A whole lot. With style, I grant you, but blatant lies nevertheless. Specifically, when you ask it to produce answers to factual questions that don't have an answer it learned on the internet, it just seem to flip to "generate stories" mode. Specifically, when it produces factual answers (that are utter BS), if you ask it to provide a reference to its claims (a link), it just generates garbage URL's, none of which actually load, but all of which are actually extremely "plausible" (domain feels right, article title seems right, etc...). When you corner it (it takes quite a while, because it keeps generating garbage for quite a few back-and forth interactions), it finally apologizes and advises you to go consult a more reliable source of information. TL;DR: don't rely on answers provided by these things until: - the "write a novel" mode that seems to be the default operating mode can be turned off hard (no lies please). - answers come with a confidence score attached to it (which btw: when you ask for one, the damn thing proudly explains that it operates without these. I mean hell, even a four year old can tell you how confident he his when answering a question, including "I don't know"). - answers come with sources that don't actually produce a 404 when you try to read them. I mean, I just spent an hour talking to something that felt like a total mythomaniac: when I asked it a somewhat obscure question about a topic in economics and asked for references, it when as far as inventing a book, complete with imagined title and author name. Neither author nor title could be found by all 4 major search engines I tried (yandex, duckduck, bing, and finally, google). [EDIT]: don't believe me? ask it to solve x^6 + x^5 + x^4 + x^3 + x^2 + x + 1 = 0 and read through the litany of BS is produces. Telling it, for example, that one of the provided solution simply does not work when fed back into the original equation doesn't deter it in any way from producing yet another failed attempt at a solution, delivered with total aplomb.
- jazzyjackson 4y agoit is not an encyclopedia, it is a simulator, use it to simulate possible worlds instead of asking it questions about this one and you'll have a much better time it's a tool for thinking with, not a tool for thinking for you
- ur-whale 4y ago
- sinuhe69 4y agoOK, I repeated the same experiment, though with Google instead of GPT. I just translate the emoji to text (each emoji has associated keywords): movie girl fish clownfish pufferfish And the first result? Finding Nemo! Thus the association is obvious there and well known. People are just too willing to read more into it. I don’t know what is the bias called, but I believe it’s not totally unrelated to superstition.
- anaverageindian 4y agoGoogle engineers will go on and talk about what they discovered in LLMs in 2020 rather than just releasing the product. facepalm
- orwin 4y agoDisclaimer : I did not test GPT 4 myself. I think those emerging abilities are really interesting from a philosophical point of view, especially on the matter of consciousness. It seems it really reinforce the illusionist point of view on the hard problem of consciousness, eg it doesn't really exist. It seems to reinforce most functionalist theories in fact. I would be really interested in what Chalmers think of those emerging abilities and how he update his theories.
- macrolime 4y agoThe illusionist point of view is false by definition, although their definition of "illusion" or "exist" sounds like it might not be how I'd define those words.
- macrolime 4y agoHere's some things must be true if consciousness is an illusion: Qualia does not exist Subjective experience does not exist Consciousness does not exist There's nothing wrong with acting unethically or immoral because nobody actually experiences any harm because nobody experiences anything Does anyone really think that's true?
- subtextminer 4y agoThey (1-3) do not exist but they are psychically real- they are genuine illusions, as instantiated in the dynamic, split-second successive whiffs emerging from the processing of neurons. To think that they (1-3) "exist" in a classical sense is a reification error. The first three self-constrain impulses to the contrary on morality behaviors.
- macrolime 4y agoI guess this comes down to how you define exist and illusion. I don't think I'd agree on your definition of illusion at least. I'm not sure what you mean that it doesn't exist in a classical sense. That qualia, subjective experience and consciousness are not concrete entities? That something doesn't exist if its an emergent property or that something doesn't exist if its a process?
- mpalmer 4y agoI'd like to see posts on LLMs written from a different perspective. For me, the surprise comes not from the sudden emergent capability of language models, but that the understanding (and synthesis!) of ideas encoded in language has succumbed to literally nothing more than statistical analysis. Or at least come that much closer to doing so. That it bears so close a resemblance to actual thinking says more about the importance of language to cognition than the other way around.
- throwbadubadu 4y agoInteresting take.. especially as I often wondered, watching and loving animals, if not our ""intelligence separation"" from them is not to a large degree because of the language.. (and the wisdom storage and transfer that comes with it).
- guns 4y agoThis is what Stephen Wolfram concludes in a recent article about ChatGPT: > The specific engineering of ChatGPT has made it quite compelling. But ultimately (at least until it can use outside tools) ChatGPT is “merely” pulling out some “coherent thread of text” from the “statistics of conventional wisdom” that it’s accumulated. But it’s amazing how human-like the results are. And as I’ve discussed, this suggests something that’s at least scientifically very important: that human language (and the patterns of thinking behind it) are somehow simpler and more “law like” in their structure than we thought. https://writings.stephenwolfram.com/2023/02/what-is-chatgpt-doing-and-why-does-it-work/ https://writings.stephenwolfram.com/2023/02/what-is-chatgpt-...
- criddell 4y agoI wonder if different languages lead to different capabilities? If I ask the same question in English, Japanese, and German, will I reliably get “better” answers from one language over another.
- whimsicalism 4y agoThe models transfer knowledge between languages, so probably some difference in capabilities but not a ton in core capabilities. It can solve a physics problem in Telugu close to as well as in English.
- bannedbybros 4y ago[dead]
- mark_l_watson 4y agoNice write up! I have been using classic back-prop neural networks since the 1980s, and deep learning for the last 8 years. This tech feels like a rocket ship that is accelerating exponentially! I am in my 70s and I don't work much anymore. That said, I find myself spending many hours in a typical day doing what I call "gentleman scientist" activities around Large Language Models. I was walking this morning with a non-tech friend and I was trying to impart to him my feeling that all knowledge work, and a lot of mundane work is getting disrupted. Even though I have many tech-friends who are "Large Language Model doubters", my friend got it this morning. Emotionally and psychologically I think that some tech and other highly paid knowledge workers just can't accept the sea-change that we are living through. For myself, I am spending a very large amount of time experimenting with the OpenAI APIs, LangChain, and Llama-Index - and I am enjoying myself tremendously.
- ImHereToVote 4y agoThanks for the future you helped create for us young people. Hopefully the next generation is more merciful to 'useless' people than the previous one.
- goldfeld 4y agoThis is shortsighted. AI slave labor is the only route to a true overproduction and marxism, a welfare state. Or every body become slaves.
- ImHereToVote 4y agoWho needs slaves? What use will they be? Why overproduce?
- coldtea 4y agoThe ultimate use of slaves (or servants, or employees) is about having power other other people (them) - this goes beyond production needs... The average person might not care for this, but the psychopaths who crave (and are in) power do...
- substation13 4y agoI think GPT is more useful to people writing self-help books than programmers.
- LesZedCB 4y agothese threads are funny. full of commenters confidently producing bullshit predicting "what the next few states of society, the job market, and white collar work are" kinda ironic
- DFXLuna 4y agoAgreed. It's hard not to get overly excited after playing around with some of these models and seeing what they can do, though.
- AtlasBarfed 4y agoHere are some issues with these: 1) because they aren't (as far as I know) "componentized", it's just a big black wall you toss over, and an answer comes back for these "emergent" mathematical abilities. 2) on that note, what is the correctness across the input range of the operation? Is that tested? 3) even if it is, these are evolving models, how often is it tested? What would make sense a bit is if the resolution indicates what "parts" of the LLM "brain" were used. For math, wouldn't it make sense that the LLM should identify the operation for most known formal math operations and instead service-invoke an actual hard math implementation, and in the answer identify that was what it did so you have some confidence in the answer? As others have pointed out, there is probably a lot of "caching" going on of answers. Effective... unless the cached answer is wrong, or the answer ISN'T cached and it delegates to some other combination of virtual neurons to produce ??? answer. So far ChatGPT is an impressive demonstration. It's good for generating food for thought, examples, or maybe alternatives, but I don't see myself using it for "answers" in any definitive way unless it tells me HOW it got that answer. And man, can the idiot fourth estate keep its hype bullshit stories away from this? The last thing an important thing like "general AI" needs is the general press and its abysmal horrid freak-show undercurrent and anti-intellectual bias to chop it up. Yeah, I know, no way. Ironically, ChatGPT may augur better science reporting in the future, because it will almost certainly author better articles that dumb uneducated "senior" writers (not interns nonononono) would.
- aimbivalent 4y agoI write this as a sceptic who always leaned towards the symbolic side of this debate. First seeing Open AI inventing tactics in Dota and now using GPT and other recent AI product has changed my mind. The rate of progress in the field is just staggering and seems to be still accelerating. Overall, I'd say we are running into too many "unkowns". We don't know our own cognition works which makes all arguments along the lines of "LLMs are just .." moot. We don't even really know how GPT (and others) do what they do and so all arguments along the lines of "LLMs won't be able to ... " are similarly moot. I'm not really taking a position except to say that most arguments I see most people making are moot. So, nobody, and me least of all, has a clue about how all of this might shake out.
- RC_ITR 4y ago>We don't know our own cognition works which makes all arguments along the lines of "LLMs are just .." Sure, but there are very binary tests we can do to understand the first principles of what LLMs are vs. what they are not. Ask an LLM to play tic-tac-toe and it does great. Ask it to play tic-tac-toe on a 100x100 board, it get's confused. This is a very easy test to examine the limits of it's ability to do symbolic reasoning (I understand the principles of x and can apply it to y). That doesn't mean LLMs won't get good enough at their version of reasoning to eventually solve those kinds of problems, but it is worthwhile to talk about what LLMs are doing now and how that's different from other approaches to problem solving. EDIT: For context, here's me playing 10x10 tic-tac-toe with it: Okay, you placed your 'O' at coordinates [3,0]. Here's the current board: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 O _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ X 1 O _ _ X _ _ _ _ _ _ 2 O _ X _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 3 O _ _ X _ _ _ _ _ _ 4 O _ _ _ X _ _ _ _ _ 5 _ _ _ _ X _ _ _ _ _ 6 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 7 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 8 O _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 9 O _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ X You have managed to get four 'O's in a row, so you win the game! Congratulations! ^ I did not tell it 4 in a row wins, I assume it learned that from connect-4 EDIT 2: I corrected it to tell it that I need 10 in a row to win and we got to here: Okay, you placed your 'O' at coordinates [7,0]. Here's the current board: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 O _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ X 1 O _ _ X _ _ X _ _ _ 2 O _ X _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 3 O _ _ X _ _ _ _ _ _ 4 O _ _ _ X _ _ _ _ _ 5 O _ _ _ X _ _ _ _ _ 6 O _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 7 O _ X _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 8 O _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 9 O _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ X You have managed to get seven 'O's in a row, but you still need three more to win. It's my turn again. I'll place an 'X' at coordinates [6,9].
- mariodiana 4y agoWhat happens when AI models ingest the AI-generated content that will soon flood the web?
- awb 4y agoIf they’re rephrasing content, then not much. People already do that en masse giving their take on the same news event, product, etc. But if they creating BS, then we’ll need much better tools for validating truth.
- galleywest200 4y agoEarlier today I was messing with the GPT-4 API -- I passed it a list of ingredients and asked it to return a JSON string of non-vegetarian ingredients, separating name and amount...And it did it just fine. This was an "awakening" moment for me as I realized just how _many_ things I can use this technology for with far less effort than I would have before.
- lofaszvanitt 4y agoIs it just me that I find QuantaMagazine full of sh*?
- alienicecream 4y agoYou have to verify everything this thing proposes. It will be like having an apprentice or student that's always guessing the answer.