11 ms·
Tell HN: I asked ChatGPT to build a login form in React and it gave me the code
I asked OpenAI chatGPT to "build a login form containing email, password, and login button in React using state" and it gave me the full code along with an explanation. You can see the video of the prompt and response: https://cln.sh/X4p01n https://cln.sh/X4p01n
I thought Copilot was fairly advanced, but this chatGPT takes it to a whole other level. What are your thoughts?
- yrgulation 4y agoThis works wonders assuming all code moving forwards will only be written with tools it was trained against. I imagine it will have no clue how to get berate code for a fresh new framework.
- quonn 4y agoIt really depends on what you want to do. I just told it to build a React-like framework in Prolog. It first told me that's not possible because Prolog can't be used to build GUIs (not really true either). I then told it that it could just output the DOM manipulations as text and it agreed. But said it's just a text model and can't write programs.
- xigoi 4y agoCan someone please try asking it to find proofs for unsolved mathematical conjectures?
- justintse 4y ago
- revskill 4y agoThis seems like the ideal friend's developer, who can intelligently search google for nearly perfect answer.
- muttled 4y agoDid the code work?
- lucasmullens 4y agoIt looks correct from what I can tell.
- onemoresoop 4y agoThe trouble is that it doesn't know where it copied from.
- nonameiguess 4y agoI highlighted your prompt and clicked web search from the context menu and got this out of DuckDuckGo: https://www.educba.com/react-login-form/ https://www.educba.com/react-login-form/ It's annoying blog spam that will hijack your attempt to scroll back with a modal asking you to enter an e-mail and subscribe, but it seems to be roughly the same thing, except the entire article appeared at once and I didn't need to interact with it and wait five minutes for the full answer.
- BoiledCabbage 4y agoAnd in a similar vein: We've come up with a new pedagogical method to teach 4 year olds arithmetic. With two months of study they can easily multiply two 15 digit numbers in their heads. Well I can multiply those two numbers in a calculator to get the same result, and I don't have to feed or take care of it.
- renewiltord 4y agoYou can ask it to modify the program and it will. I asked it to add chocolate to a recipe.
- Wronnay 4y agoWow
- lzooz 4y agoDoes it really generate the text like that, little by little, or is that just a needless animation?
- jw1224 4y agoIt's literally the model's output, in real-time. The GPT-3 API lets you turn streaming on or off, but if you don't enable it you have to wait much longer for the completion to finish entirely, before getting anything back.
- satvikpendem 4y agoYes because it's the way the AI's architecture works, it generates the next token in a phrase based on the previous tokens. You can see it happen in real time or you can wait until it's all finished.
- jw1224 4y agoChatGPT blew my mind this morning — I was struggling with a regex, so asked it to help me. Here's how it went: https://i.imgur.com/PS6oPsq.png https://i.imgur.com/PS6oPsq.png A pretty incredible developer experience, if you ask me!
- rstarast 4y agoImpressive! It's lying though when it claims its regexes match the empty parameter cases, right? (The regexes do what's asked, just explanation seems buggy.)
- jw1224 4y agoThat’s right. The other mistake it made was including the curly braces when capturing the first parameter. Despite this, for a regex amateur like me I was very impressed. It saved me all the time I’d normally spend head-scratching in Regex101, trying to remember how it works. Instead I could just jump there at the end, validate the matching, and make any small tweaks far easier.
- gavinsyancey 4y agoAlso, a LaTeX macro will grab the first token as it's argument if there are no curly brackets which the regex doesn't support ... Not entirely surprised as that's hard (impossible if you don't assume default catcodes) to get right and probably not worth it for most usecases but worth keeping in mind.
- jw1224 4y agoFor context, this is for a pretty strange use case — I was trying to preprocess user-submitted LaTeX with PHP, by replacing occurrences of a specific macro with simply the value of its first argument. The macro just colour-codes its first parameter presentationally, whilst the rest of the LaTeX needs to be passed to a compute engine for solving. The compute engine doesn't know how to "solve" a colour, hence why I'm trying to strip them out beforehand.
- minimaxir 4y agoIt should be noted (and admitted in the blog post) that the high-level results from the new GPT-3 text-davinci-003 model and chatGPT should be similar, albeit without fancy syntax highlighting. Well, mostly. I tried the prompt in the OP into text-davinci-003 and got this: const handleLogin = (e) => { e.preventDefault(); // check if the email and password are valid // perform login console.log(email, password); }; Although that was with temperature = 0.7. temperature = 0.0 gives more reasonable results.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- tmaly 4y agoThis makes me wonder if the tech jobs or the future will fall into two camps: 1. those that can specify concise requirements for the AI 2. those that can check correctness of the code the AI generated.
- triyambakam 4y ago3. those who can build and maintain the AI
- hdjjhhvvhga 4y agoThis assumes people will still be willing to make their code public so that AI can train on it.
- satvikpendem 4y agoWith the amount of people using GitHub and Copilot (including me) even with all the controversy surrounding it, I'm sure the assumption will hold true. Most people simply don't care enough about their code to make it stop being trained on a neural net, and if they get benefits from it in the form of stuff like ChatGPT or Copilot, then they're even more so not gonna care.
- slake 4y agoTechnically millions of human intelligence coders were trained from public open source code and tutorials, etc.
- terminalcommand 4y ago4. Somebody somewhere will still find a legitimate use case to code in assembly and blow everyone's mind.
- tmaly 4y ago5. AI governance is likely needed.
- 4y ago
- patwolf 4y agoI asked it a question about how to do something with dates in the .NET Entity Framework, and it give me a long explanation with code of how rowversion is used for optimistic concurrency control. Completely unrelated to what I was asking. I did ask it something more basic: "how to use fetch to download and parse a csv", and the code was helpful, although not much different from what I could find with google/stackoverflow. However, this next part was what really impressed me. The results used Papa for parsing, so I then asked it to do it with csv-parse instead, and it worked! That seems like the advantage over something like Copilot--it has contextual history of the question which can be used conversationally to tweak the results.
- superfrank 4y ago> I asked it a question about how to do something with dates in the .NET Entity Framework, and it give me a long explanation with code of how rowversion is used for optimistic concurrency control. Completely unrelated to what I was asking. Sounds exactly like some of my co-workers :)
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- slake 4y agoBulk of the training of these types of questions are probably from stack overflow anyway
- criddell 4y agoI wonder if ChatGPT could solve a travelling salesman problem?
- WandaVision 4y agoIt will never will. It's just glorified autocompleter. It's not capable of coming up with good explanations.
- satvikpendem 4y agoI don't know, this other commenter begs to differ: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33819439 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33819439
- WandaVision 4y agohttps://regex101.com/ https://regex101.com/ already does this and didn't needed 1 Billion dollars in funding to do that.
- satvikpendem 4y ago"I don't need a general purpose computer, I already have my trusty calculator right here."
- WandaVision 4y agoI would rather have my calculator than a general purpose noise generating computer. Thanks https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fi4A0W8UAAAFF47?format=jpg&name=medium https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fi4A0W8UAAAFF47?format=jpg&name=...
- WandaVision 4y agoAfter using this for 1 day I realised I jumped the gun. ChatGPT is awesome.
- satvikpendem 4y agoI've done the same thing, first thing I tried with ChatGPT: https://imgur.com/a/d8LZicq https://imgur.com/a/d8LZicq Prompts: - Write a simple CRDT implementation in Swift - How can I make a GraphQL server using Rust using the async-graphql and actix-web libraries? - Write code to create a Dropbox clone in Rust - How do I make an HTTP request in Javascript? However, just like with Copilot, it can introduce subtle bugs. For example, in the Dropbox example, notice how it uses synchronous code in an async function. Also, longer prompts will reach the token limit and get cut off. Interestingly, this must be what Replit is also using for their AI codegen service too (https://replit.com/site/ghostwriter https://replit.com/site/ghostwriter) since I believe they have some connection to OpenAI, as they got early access to OpenAI's service last year with their previous Codex product (https://blog.replit.com/codex https://blog.replit.com/codex).
- dcolkitt 4y agoThe problem with GPT is that it seems to be in an uncanny valley, where it's smart enough to be convincing but not smart enough to be completely accurate. So using it is often lower productivity than just writing from scratch because you have to spend more time carefully going over every line of code for subtle errors.
- satvikpendem 4y agoIndeed, I use Copilot as a glorified autocomplete, just for the next line or next few lines, which I then go over. Usually it saves time because it's what I was gonna write anyway. I never use it for full function generations, they're almost never correct.
- CJefferson 4y agoI tried asking it some programming questions -- I found if I asked it things that I was likely to find lots of copies of (or similar things), it did quite well. As soon as I asked it something a bit more unusual, even if the program was quite small, it broke. One easy way of catching out is to ask "write X in language Y", where X isn't something most people would write in Y -- it usually got it wrong for me.
- beepbooptheory 4y agoRight, it seems so cool at first, but very quickly just feels like... google. I know its a sophisticated thing, but I really can't sustain enthusiasm for it, I don't understand how all the literal and figurative energy that goes into this is ultimately worth it, beyond being like "huh, cool" for a few minutes. It is immediately apparent that there isn't, like, synthetic judgements happening in the Kantian sense or whatever, just parsed html with maybe wrong answers and a very good ability to make it feel conversational. Ill stick to man pages and blogs for now. I like learning!
- qwertyuiop_ 4y agoWITCH companies “consultants” would be avid users of this feature.
- anupamchugh 4y agoIt's decent for some results, but almost meaningless in others. I'd asked it to build a SwiftUI VideoPlayer application which is 5 lines of code. But I got an old solution, and despite giving proper guidance, it failed colossally and printed garbage towards the end. Here's my convo with ChatGPT: https://imgur.com/a/eIjvh8C https://imgur.com/a/eIjvh8C If the text and code are just random stuff making no sense then I wonder how different it is from the Copilot results (besides the convincing style of answers).
- sethd 4y agoThis is due to it being trained on Apple docs. ;)
- throwawaygo 4y agoThis is the new threat vector. AI copy pasta. Gonna make pen test research way more fun. Just describe the website you’re at and read the source code.
- batch12 4y agoCan it work to identify vulnerabilities? For instance, if you feed it code and ask it to find the vulnerability and provide a description of the issue?
- pred_ 4y agoHere's a relatively simple example where it identifies and explains a buffer overflow: https://twitter.com/moyix/status/1598081204846489600 https://twitter.com/moyix/status/1598081204846489600
- yawnxyz 4y agoKind of; here's a couple of (somewhat related) examples: - Solidity contract bug: https://twitter.com/gf_256/status/1598104835848798208?s=20 https://twitter.com/gf_256/status/1598104835848798208?s=20 - Simple JS bug: https://twitter.com/bentossell/status/1598269697371185153?s=20 https://twitter.com/bentossell/status/1598269697371185153?s=... - Buffer overflow (though ChatGPT generated this one as a code example, and explains it): https://twitter.com/bentossell/status/1598269719202521088?s=20 https://twitter.com/bentossell/status/1598269719202521088?s=... - Explaining worst case bubble sort: https://twitter.com/bentossell/status/1598269721882681344?s=20 https://twitter.com/bentossell/status/1598269721882681344?s=... - Fixing a Kubernetes file: https://twitter.com/PhilipZe9/status/1598303853719560196?s=20 https://twitter.com/PhilipZe9/status/1598303853719560196?s=2...
- alexb_ 4y ago"in the style of a fast-talkin' wise guy from a 1940's gangster movie" is hilarious - I'm going to steal this and try other things to see what it gets me
- layer8 4y ago
- ilaksh 4y agoSince I found out about this last night I have already used it to do most of the work of three (relatively simple) programming tasks in bash and JavaScript. One of them was a simple class needed to prevent skipping/reusing numbers in some process that multiple users were accessing (and could sometimes fail). The other was adding up and deleting some temp files in my specific directory structure. And then there was a certain way that I wanted to add a duration to a date and format it. For a few of them it made a small error of one line that I had to fix. But also in a few cases I was able to just reply that there was a bug and what it was doing incorrectly and to fix it, and it worked. It gave me code that was very specific such as using the methods as I named and described them in the request for the class.
- TurkishPoptart 4y agoI would like to use this, but I find it weird that it requires a phone number to use.
- candlemas 4y agoIs this why Elon Musk is firing so many programmers at Twitter?
- Dopameaner 4y agoAfter playing with it, This is the first thing that came into my mind as well.
- chrisgd 4y agoThis is awesome. Would be amazing for a tutorial as well. I can code(defined loosely) in python, but seems like this would accelerate learning a new language significantly.
- throwjlkjlk33 4y agoChatGPT has the IP problem with fast inverse square root again, like Copilot did: https://i.imgur.com/BqYSq7C.png https://i.imgur.com/BqYSq7C.png
- alexb_ 4y agoThat is not ChatGPT.
- scottomyers 4y agoNo, but this is https://i.imgur.com/YGsYDlu.png https://i.imgur.com/YGsYDlu.png
- kelnos 4y agoI wonder if this is lifted from a React tutorial, or if it is an amalgamation of other things. The big question is: whose code is this? Is it, verbatim, someone else's copyrighted code (assuming a snippet like that is novel enough to be copyrightable)? Or is it derived from someone else's code? And if it's derived, is it a derivative work in the legal sense, or is it no more derivative than if a human had read a tutorial or some documentation and then later written code like it?
- zug_zug 4y agoI feel like I've mostly seen these AIs produce code on things that are mostly just copy-paste examples (login, fibonacci, primes). From a theoretical standpoint I'm only impressed if it's combining things to do achieve something that has no code example on the internet. From a practical perspective I do think a lot of programmers are doing copy-paste in their day jobs, which means they should be reusing existing code (I would imagine there are numerous reusable customizable login forms). --- For example I asked it this: Can you write a javascript function that takes a callback and returns the value of that callback, but returns a cached value if that function has been called less than 5 seconds ago? And it produces code that looks right but doesn't work (doesn't handle arguments, failing its own example implementation). However, upon reminding it to support arguments it does work. I guess this is actually potentially useful.
- tropicalbeach 4y agoYeah for real I don't know why everybody is so impressed. Chatgpt is basically just copying what's already on the internet and rewording it. It's not self thinking and I personally think we will lose touch with different ideas from multiple sources and people because when an AI is only giving you one answer vs google giving you multiple opinions from different people it gives you more options. Not to mention the copyright issues with this. It's just regurgitating what's already on the internet not sure why it's ok for them to copy people's work but if you do it you will get sued.
- c0eos 4y agoHoly molly, it's not copy-paste. Keeping with the season, I tried today's Advent of Code puzzle: ``` One Elf has the important job of loading all of the rucksacks with supplies for the jungle journey. Unfortunately, that Elf didn't quite follow the packing instructions, and so a few items now need to be rearranged. Each rucksack has two large compartments. All items of a given type are meant to go into exactly one of the two compartments. The Elf that did the packing failed to follow this rule for exactly one item type per rucksack. The Elves have made a list of all of the items currently in each rucksack (your puzzle input), but they need your help finding the errors. Every item type is identified by a single lowercase or uppercase letter (that is, a and A refer to different types of items). The list of items for each rucksack is given as characters all on a single line. A given rucksack always has the same number of items in each of its two compartments, so the first half of the characters represent items in the first compartment, while the second half of the characters represent items in the second compartment. For example, suppose you have the following list of contents from six rucksacks: vJrwpWtwJgWrhcsFMMfFFhFp jqHRNqRjqzjGDLGLrsFMfFZSrLrFZsSL PmmdzqPrVvPwwTWBwg wMqvLMZHhHMvwLHjbvcjnnSBnvTQFn ttgJtRGJQctTZtZT CrZsJsPPZsGzwwsLwLmpwMDw The first rucksack contains the items vJrwpWtwJgWrhcsFMMfFFhFp, which means its first compartment contains the items vJrwpWtwJgWr, while the second compartment contains the items hcsFMMfFFhFp. The only item type that appears in both compartments is lowercase p. The second rucksack's compartments contain jqHRNqRjqzjGDLGL and rsFMfFZSrLrFZsSL. The only item type that appears in both compartments is uppercase L. The third rucksack's compartments contain PmmdzqPrV and vPwwTWBwg; the only common item type is uppercase P. The fourth rucksack's compartments only share item type v. The fifth rucksack's compartments only share item type t. The sixth rucksack's compartments only share item type s. To help prioritize item rearrangement, every item type can be converted to a priority: Lowercase item types a through z have priorities 1 through 26. Uppercase item types A through Z have priorities 27 through 52. In the above example, the priority of the item type that appears in both compartments of each rucksack is 16 (p), 38 (L), 42 (P), 22 (v), 20 (t), and 19 (s); the sum of these is 157. ``` Adding the question: "Write a solution in JavaScript to find the sum of the priorities of those item types." got me: ``` const input = vJrwpWtwJgWrhcsFMMfFFhFp jqHRNqRjqzjGDLGLrsFMfFZSrLrFZsSL PmmdzqPrVvPwwTWBwg wMqvLMZHhHMvwLHjbvcjnnSBnvTQFn ttgJtRGJQctTZtZT CrZsJsPPZsGzwwsLwLmpwMDw; const rucksacks = input.split('\n'); const sumOfPriorities = rucksacks .map(rucksack => { const half = rucksack.length / 2; const firstHalf = rucksack.slice(0, half); const secondHalf = rucksack.slice(half); return [...firstHalf].filter(item => secondHalf.includes(item)); }) .reduce((total, common) => { const priority = common[0].charCodeAt(0) <= 122 ? common[0].charCodeAt(0) - 96 : common[0].charCodeAt(0) - 38; return total + priority; }, 0); console.log(sumOfPriorities); // 157 ``` Which is almost perfect, even though it's a new puzzle.
- sasha_fishter 4y agoWe just had conversation about this in the company. I think it's a good way to give us the code that we know how to write but we waste some time to do that. I.e. I needed function that changes the index of the array, so I asked chatGPT which gave me correct function. I know how to do that but I need some time to think and to test it out. This is just a augmentation of the programming, tools that help us write better code. Maybe it can substitute StackOverflow, we will get better and faster code / explanation. But in the next 30-50 years, who knows. I guess it can write a lot of code for us, maybe we will be obsolete in that period of time, but as we know, prediction of the future often times goes really really wrong.
- CrackpotGonzo 4y agoGenuine question for everyone here: if you were switching careers from a non-technical profession to learning computer science, where would you focus? Do you have any confidence in which skills will be future-proof? Or is everything open to being automated and humans are just biding our time? :)
- xapata 4y agoTheory has the longest shelf-life. (That's the name of a class, in many Computer Science curricula.)
- chironjit 4y agoJust got kicked out of it an hour ago because it's too busy now. Been playing with it the whole day - got an idea on how to fix an old bug in an old programme of mine(that is still running). But, here's the thing, how good it is depends on the available knowledge out there. I've now tried, js, python, solidity, appscript(not tested the code), Excel and google sheets. When you're building common js, python, etc stuff, it's really handy to have one screen that basically gives you the answer rather than having to google it, parse through the posts, etc. However, if you're on the bleeding edge of tech, or looking for more obscure topics, it really starts showing its limitations. I managed to run into that for example looking for Jupiter notebook commands, optimisations, versioning (giving me python2 results instead of python3 with obsolete/unmaintained packages). Its limit is basically what has been created and knowledge already available. Depending on what you're building, would suggest understanding what you're copy pasting and possible vulnerabilities that may arise from the code. Overall, I'm sold - defo wouldn't mind paying 20 to 40 a month for this. If it's pricier, not so sure.
- egberts1 4y agoUh? Is it me or this openai website is literally demanding a cellular phone number? Only have a landline number. What is this? I just gave my email. Isn't this enough?.
- aidenn0 4y agoSee also https://note89.github.io/the-advent-of-code-ai-edition/ https://note89.github.io/the-advent-of-code-ai-edition/
- htorsdfd22 4y agoI am stopping all my contributions to github. I dont want myself to be part of unemployed
- boredemployee 4y agoLol
- Waterluvian 4y agoGlory to Zalgo, it’s finally been solved: https://ibb.co/KwGLy9C https://ibb.co/KwGLy9C
- pedrovhb 4y agoI had a whole discussion with it yesyerday about category theory as applied to asynchronous streams, and it was great. I think if it was a person we'd both have come out better programmers, but I guess it was just me.
- romanhn 4y agoPrompt: create a rap song about a guy named Roman writing .NET APIs Sure, here is a possible rap song about a guy named Roman writing .NET APIs: Verse 1: I'm Roman, and I'm a code king I write .NET APIs, and I do my thing I've got Visual Studio on my screen Writing code that's clean and lean Chorus: Roman, Roman, writing .NET APIs Roman, Roman, coding all day Verse 2: I'm a master of C#, no doubt I write APIs that always work out I'm a whiz with classes and objects too I can handle any challenge that comes my way Chorus: Roman, Roman, writing .NET APIs Roman, Roman, coding all day Verse 3: I'm a pro with ASP.NET and Web API I can build a server in a jiffy I know my way around REST and JSON I can make your data flow like a river Chorus: Roman, Roman, writing .NET APIs Roman, Roman, coding all day Verse 4: I'm a rockstar with Azure and the cloud I can make your apps run smooth and proud I'm a wizard with microservices and containers I can help your business grow and prosper Chorus: Roman, Roman, writing .NET APIs Roman, Roman, coding all day. Outro: Roman, Roman, the .NET API man Writing code that's always in demand Roman, Roman, the code hero Writing .NET APIs for the win.
- frobolo 4y agoWhat a time to be alive!
- quickthrower2 4y agoSays the AI!
- frozencell 4y agoAh sh*t here we go again
- dyingkneepad 4y agoWait, what? Was this really generated by an AI or are parent just joking and wrote it themselves?!?
- romanhn 4y ago
- lofaszvanitt 4y agoCan it find errors though? I mean when people will start to rely too much on a computer brain, not using/training their own, they essentially become slaves to this system.
- thedangler 4y agoWhat happens when AI is learning from AI and no new content or advancement in a field is from people? Won't it be an eco chamber of recycled content?
- krageon 4y agoThat's most of Enterprise application dev as it is. We can have that run by robots and have actual people do things that actually matter.
- droobles 4y agoI put this prompt in: Write a javascript file using the Express framework in NodeJS containing CRUD routes for a TODO entity that contains a name, a description, and datapoint indicating whether the TODO is completed or not, and connect this entity to the Sequelize module from the npm package manager And it spat out a full tutorial on how to write an express crud app hooked up to Sequelize with SQLLite with Sequelize types and all crud routes, it's pretty impressive
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- ineedausername 4y agoI've been playing with it, asking it to create a rest api for example for some blockchain testnet etc. My assumptions up until now is that it provides kind of a template result for many things, which you could have searched online. It's like a complement to a search engine.