11 ms·

My Life Unmasking British Eavesdroppers

309 points by aarkay 11y ago

acqq 11y ago
The original source link with the new content: https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2015/08/03/life-unmasking-british-eavesdroppers/ https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2015/08/03/life-unmasking...
- dang 11y ago
  Yes. Url changed from http://techcrunch.com/2015/08/03/uncovering-echelon-the-top-secret-nsa-program-that-has-been-watching-you-your-entire-life/?ncid=rss&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Techcrunch+%28TechCrunch%29&utm_content=FaceBook&sr_share=facebook http://techcrunch.com/2015/08/03/uncovering-echelon-the-top-..., which points to this.
mirimir 11y ago
The Intercept: https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2015/08/03/life-unmasking-british-eavesdroppers/ https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2015/08/03/life-unmasking... There's lots of 1998-2001 stuff on cryptome.org :) Total TFH then. Now, not so much :(
- happyscrappy 11y ago
  Imagine what actually goes on now.
  - mirimir 11y ago
    They intercept just about everything, for sure. And they apparently do a decent job at triage. But the false positive paradox is still problematic.[0] Epidemiology is a bitch ;) [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_positive_paradox https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_positive_paradox
    - TheOtherHobbes 11y ago
      I think it's more interesting to wonder how it's possible for the US to be surprised by movements like ISIS or by random shooters when surveillance is supposed to be total. Obviously there are many ways in which information can be lost between source and policy. But it's still strange that some events appear to be a complete surprise. If Snowden and Campbell are correct, they really shouldn't be.
      - e12e 11y ago
        There's the possibility that total electronic surveillance is real and that it's no good at countering the kind of threats it supposedly is used against. If you want conspiracy, consider this: what impact did the #occupy movement have on the world order? That certainly was more dangerous to the establishment than someone scaring the population with terror attacks. Or if you believe the official story: who are all the people assassinated with extra-legal (from an international law perspective, anyway) drone strikes in Yemen? Are they enemies of the US?
        TeMPOraL 11y ago
        > what impact did the #occupy movement have on the world order? Exactly none? People just shouted for a while, maybe burned a few cars, and then they got bored with it. Terror attack on the other hand tend to scare the living shit and every remaining ounce of rational thought out of people. People worldwide supported two wars over 9/11.
      - jacquesm 11y ago
        Mass surveillance may simply be less useful. There are people that use the fact that 'it works' as an argument pro-surveillance. I don't agree with that argument but it gets used quite frequently. Now imagine how bad it would be if all this mass surveillance went on and it wasn't even effective. That's no way to get a bigger budget next year. So Snowden and Campbell are likely correct and those that argue that 'it works' could very well be wrong at the same time.
      - TeMPOraL 11y ago
- api 11y ago
  Time seems to have had a way of vindicating at least some tin foil hatters, yet people today are just as ready to dismiss as 'crazy conspiracy theory' any similar extrapolations or speculations. If you strip off the really genuinely nutty stuff, quite a bit of what I remember reading nutters talk about on places like Usenet alt.conspiracy in the 1990s is now reality. Some of what's now reality would have made them blush. The conspiranoids would have called you crazy if you'd suggested that everyone would be carrying devices that constantly report their location at all times to central servers owned by closely state-connected corporations -- and that people would accept this willingly and even pay out of pocket for these devices themselves.
  - pdkl95 11y ago
    > dismiss as 'crazy conspiracy theory' This is simply a current example of the political strategy known as the paranoid style. Just like the fear about "reds" in McCarthyism and various right-wing groups that used racial fears for political gain, there has been a very succcessful application of the paranoid style against the very idea of investigating the intelligence community. If you (or anybody else) haven't read it, I suggest reading the original essay[1] on the subject. It may be over 50 year old, but it is probably one of the more important essays for understanding the modern (~post-WW2) American politics and how "conspiracy theory" has been used as a way of rallying people against "the enemy". [1] http://harpers.org/archive/1964/11/the-paranoid-style-in-american-politics/ http://harpers.org/archive/1964/11/the-paranoid-style-in-ame...
  - tedunangst 11y ago
    > If you strip off the really genuinely nutty stuff, quite a bit of what I remember reading nutters talk about on places like Usenet alt.conspiracy in the 1990s is now reality. well, yeah. if you ignore all the crazy, what's left isn't crazy. why is that surprising? > The conspiranoids would have called you crazy if you'd suggested that everyone would be carrying devices that constantly report their location at all times would they? that seems like a pretty obvious consequence of carrying a cell phone. maybe my recollection is different, but i don't think people were saying "the government reads your email" was a crazy idea. they were saying "the government reads your email on their secret moon base staffed by hitler clones" was a crazy idea. if you want to make the argument that the hatters were right all along but were wrongly dismissed, find a specific claim that was made, and a specific counterclaim. these "right all along" discussions always slide into unfalsifiable generalities and strawmen.
- TeMPOraL 11y ago
  I'm very reluctant to dismiss anything as tinfoilhattery nowadays. I always thought that people afraid of "chemtrails" are paranoid and believe obviously silly stories. Because why would anyone do that? And then very recently, on HN of all places, I learned that US Government did in fact spray bacteria on their own civilians for biowarfare research purposes, without the public knowing for decades. It's getting harder to distinguish the crazy from the truth. I still don't believe in faked Moon landing though.
shahryc 11y ago
"Since then, the program has largely been presented to the public only through posts on government surveillance/conspiracy forum..." ------ I guess the conspiracy theorists weren't that crazy after all.
guimarin 11y ago
Back when I was a kid, Enemy of the State was not a documentary. But really, if you cared about Privacy/Security at all since the 80's you'd've known about Echelon, Echelon II, etc. You've also read up on ThinThread and Trailblazer. My favorite is the No Such Agency adjunct that pulled like $200m a year in funding with 3 people in the division. Well and this patch: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/cb/Logo_of_Infrared_Space_Systems_Directorate.png https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/cb/Logo_of_... quite literally the greatest US Gov't Patch of all time.
- codezero 11y ago
  I've always been partial to this one: https://i.imgur.com/XaIWseY.jpg https://i.imgur.com/XaIWseY.jpg
  - WiseWeasel 11y ago
    Sure, that's a great example of classic Bond-villain-like appeal, but I still have to recognize the design team who pushed this work of an entirely different level of greatness through committee approval: http://www.nro.gov/images/launches/nrol-66/NROL-66-patch.jpg http://www.nro.gov/images/launches/nrol-66/NROL-66-patch.jpg
  - kristofferR 11y ago
    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3c/NROL49_patch.jpg http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3c/NROL49_pa... The text translates to: "Better the devil that you know".
- wozniacki 11y ago
  A 2006 Italian movie, "In ascolto" ( The Listening ) [1] [2] [3] presents a much more realistic plot. [1] The Listening (film) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Listening_(film) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Listening_(film) [2] NYT Review http://www.nytimes.com/movies/movie/351999/The-Listening/overview http://www.nytimes.com/movies/movie/351999/The-Listening/ove... [3] Trailer - The Listening (2006) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZlVK906Xzr8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZlVK906Xzr8
signaler 11y ago
First learned about ECHELON in Robert Ludlum's Bourne series: http://bourne.wikia.com/wiki/ECHELON http://bourne.wikia.com/wiki/ECHELON The key difference being that this is trunk VOIP ingestion, not the more sinister PRISM and TURMOIL stuff which is much more invasive
1arity 11y ago
A Moral Thesis in Defense of Surveillance People talk about civil freedoms, and they incorrectly attribute lack of surveillance the status of a civil freedom. Freedom from observation is not freedom, freedom from incorrect enforcement is freedom. Observation does not alter the moral scope of the individual, or the moral scope of the society. The individual's choice to limit their own moral scope under observation is what limits their scope. Surveillance does not affect the effective moral scope. Enforcement defines the ( effective ) moral scope ( the scope of actions that individuals can do without expecting hindrance from society ). More comprehensive surveillance, leads to more clear enforcement, and more clear enforcement preserves in clearer definition those freedoms which are expressly not prohibited under the moral scope of a society. Surveillance is a tool of freedom. Specifically, a tool that contributes to preserving the freedom of action of individuals by contributing to more effective enforcement. Without surveillance the machinery of enforcement can be more messily and liberally applied. The fake left doctrines complain about surveillance as a tool of oppression. Surveillance is seen in fact a tool of freedom, it is the light shone upon. The fake left doctrine has framed the entire debate incorrectly. Absence of surveillance is not a civil freedom, it is in fact an assurance of imprecisely applied enforcement. Surveillance is a civil freedom. Lawful enforcement is a civil freedom. The remaining civil freedoms, known as "civil liberties" are those things permitted by an individual's effective moral scope. Civil liberties, like morals in general, are not absolute, they are the choices made by societies to define themselves at a particular time and place. ( The color of absolutism is invoked because that promotes harmony -- if something is absolute it is beyond question. This is not a real admission of absolute, simply a shorthand for a society saying the debate about this way we define ourselves is complete, for now. ) Civil freedoms are distinguished from civil liberties in that civil freedoms include those acts, two of which are defined above, which effect whatever civil liberties are chosen. Civil freedoms include the machinery of creation of civil liberties. The relationship between the state and the individual is somewhat akin to that between a parent and a baby. A baby is many things, and it is also helpless and chaotic without the governance of the parent. The parent's attentive observation ( surveillance ) of the baby presents the baby from harming itself. The state's attentive surveillance of the individuals presents them from harming themselves and others. If large groups of individuals were capable of governing themselves in an ad-hoc fashion then...the internet, reddit, all of these places would be domains of inclusion, tolerance, peace, and respect. In fact, moderators, and moderators of moderators, and policies, and a central authority are required to prevent chaos and harm. These things ( observations and controls -- surveillance and enforcement ) are the very enablers of the same liberties that the fake left doctrine purports they destroy. The fake left doctrines complain about surveillance as a tool of oppression. They use "freedom" in an intangible, absolute sense. A mythological "Perfect Freedom of the Individual", a delusion that fails to acknowledge the social context in which any freedom of action exists. These fake left doctrines are founded on a delusion of a freedom unhindered by a social context. They are the fake left's dream of the mythical Powerful Individual, a delusion to compensate for the collective belief of the fake left of the powerlessness of the individual against some mythical oppressive force. In fact, for an individual exposed only to lawful restriction of their action, their only powerlessness is their fabrication of their own powerlessness. The mythical oppressor of the fake left is in fact, not the lawful surveillance state, it is the individual that chooses to believe itself powerless. Surveillance is not oppression, incorrectly applied enforcement is the very definition of oppression. And as the net of surveillance is narrowed, a broader net of enforcement must be cast to protect individuals from themselves. The fundamental that the fake left has not grasped is that the trade off is not between "broader freedoms and broader surveillance" it is between "broader surveillance or broader enforcement", and broader enforcement, without the information, is going to be incorrectly applied.
godgod 11y ago
1984 is here. This must end otherwise we are not free.
sandworm101 11y ago
The problem with Echalon-type programs today is cultural. They were/are intelligence operations. But today "intelligence" has grown to encompass criminal investigations and targeted, violent, operations such as drone strikes. An intelligence operation does not need to be 100% accurate. Huge volumes of less-than-perfect data are examined by experts who then issue reports, opinions, on what is actually happening. The top report would be the sort of things included in a president's daily briefing. That was basic cold-war intelligence. Today's leaders expect surveillance to be absolute. They don't want "and increased likelihood of attack", they want "Mr. Smith will be onboard flight 123 at 2pm". That's the level you need to send a bunch of cops to lawfully and publicly arrest a specific person and take them to a court for prosecution. Such things require very different methods, methods for which ECHALON was never designed.
- toyg 11y ago
  > today "intelligence" has grown to encompass criminal investigations That's a function of changed political objectives. "The enemy" became a liquid definition, purely for political reasons: "Arab terrorism" can easily be redefined as OLP or Taliban or Iran or AQ or IS or or or, keeping the public "at war" indefinitely and impeding scrutiny of reigning confusion in foreign policy. Until that stops, it's politically very difficult to fight calls for "more intelligence to stop our planes blowing up". Unfortunately, the US (and EU allies, especially France and Britain) have now managed to screw up an entire continent so much, that a clear statement of interest to "reset" this state of things is almost impossible. In comparison, Vietnam and Cambodia were a walk in the park.
teh_klev 11y ago
I remember the Zircon affair quite vividly. At the time I was a 20 year old student union activist, CND member (still a member) and involved in the Scottish independence movement (SNP member when it was unfashionable). A couple of days after BBC Scotland was raided by Special Branch a bunch of us attended a viewing of the "banned" Secret Society "Zircon" programme in Edinburgh in the City Chambers (I think). Duncan Campbell was present and gave a short introduction. It was a positively electrifying event. I managed to get hold of a copy of the episode for distribution and viewing at my college. It was handed to me in a jiffy bag, the VHS video cassette was labelled "Mickey Mouse", I think I have it in a box somewhere.
- wrboyce 11y ago
  Is this[1] the programme you refer to? [1]: https://vimeo.com/44948377 https://vimeo.com/44948377
  - teh_klev 11y ago
    Yes, that's the one. Seems like a storm in a teacup now.
  - billybofh 11y ago
    I've been looking for a copy of that for ages - thank you!
  - pbhjpbhj 11y ago
    At 19:19 it's hilarious - British Aerospace gave the game away about the 3rd "Skynet" satellite being at 53deg East instead of where it should be, then that info was rescinded in later releases (showing it was important), then the centre for tracking the Skynet satellites (in this segment) only has 2 tracking dishes. British SigInt were really, really bad at lying it seems. Or, was this just the diversion ...
  - teh_klev 11y ago
    Also worth a watch, Mr Campbell himself giving a talk at The Register Christmas Lecture: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qJfFOJVRMNU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qJfFOJVRMNU
evilhaskeller 11y ago
I remember an IRC channel about security in the early 2000s. Somehow we started discussing government surveillance, and someone mentioned ECHELON. People's reactions were interesting: most people immediately dismissed it as being "impossible", or "another conspiracy theory". It makes me sad.
- yborg 11y ago
  How quickly we forget. Long before that, back in the USENET days, it was a common joke to include a .sig line "for the ECHELON line reader" with a list of words that the presumed NSA computer would match against, like "KGB nuclear anthrax bioweapon" etc. The joke being that if everyone would include these, they would end up having to analyze the entire newsgroup feed.
  - SapphireSun 11y ago
    Heh, there's an emacs command for that too. M-x spook
  - carbocation 11y ago
    I took that more as a subversive act, rather than as a joke.
- colllectorof 11y ago
  Yeah. The worst part, though, is that a lot of the same people now did a 180 and reside firmly in the "I have nothing to hide" camp. They jumped from dismissing global surveillance as too far-fetched and intrusive for reality straight to dismissing it as a triviality not worthy of further though. These people have no imagination, that's the problem. They could not imagine the possibilities, which were easily guessable at the time if you knew anything about technology. Now, they cannot imagine the consequences, which are easily guessable if you know anything about people and intelligence agencies.
  - Mikushi 11y ago
    That's what happens when the ones in charge have a deep understanding of the human mind and how trivial it is to shape it and the ideas/values it contains. As I said in another thread, unrelated, things like propaganda and by association advertising are unethical at best, it's subversion/coercion on a massive scale, it truly shapes people in something they are not. And they count on the fact that people reject the fact that they are easily manipulated (applies for me too).
sr_banksy 11y ago
Great insight into how free-speech, freedom of press and privacy laws work and have evolved on both sides of the Atlantic. Having lived on either end of the pond as an average citizen, I know the American Press enjoys greater and truer freedom. They hold the legislators accountable. The British press, on the other hand, felt malleable, made to bend any which way the government choose. The BBC creates invaluable programming, but also is bound to the government by the purse. It always felt like the government meddled with its affairs. And now some great to get some historical context into it as well!
sr_banksy 11y ago
Great insight into how free-speech, freedom of press and privacy laws work and have evolved on both sides of the Atlantic. Having lived on either end of the pond as an average citizen, I know the American Press enjoys greater and truer freedom. They hold the legislators accountable. The British press, on the other hand, felt malleable, made to bend any which way the government choose. The BBC creates invaluable programming, but also is bound to the government by the purse. It always felt like the government meddled with its affairs. And now some great to get some historical context into it as well!
olorundaglory 11y ago
GREETINGS TO EVERYONE OF YOU THAT IS READING THIS, ADVERTISEMENT HAS BEEN ADVERTISE IN ALL OVER THE NATION AND WEBSITE E.G TOKUNBO WEBSITE,NTA NEWS, AIT NEWS, OSRC, ITV, FM STATION, NEWSPAPER ETC, We deal in all cars, you can also make a request for the vehicle you want to purchase and also your budget for any vehicle, we shall call you back to inform you about it. we have these cars for sale right now. WE HAVE DIRECT TOKUNBO CARS VERY CLEAN AND BRAND NEW CARS FOR SALE AT A CHEAPER PRICES. These cars were seized by government officials at border and the time duration given to the owners to claim their cars has elapse so they are been sold in a give away price. All you need do is to call on 554 OR CALL MRS olorunda glory on 08067834923 OR EMAIL US ON Nigeriacustomauctionservice@yahoo.com WE HAVE THOSE VEHICLE FOR SALE NOW: TOYOTA HIGH LANDER 2003 - 2012 (N500,000) HONDA CRV 2000 - 2009 (N550,000) TOYOTA COROLLA 2003 - 2006 (N300,000) TOYOTA MATRIX 2005 - 2010 (N450,000) TOYOTA ALVALLON 2004 (N500,000) Acura MDX N500,000 Acura TL N400,000 Acura ZDX N700,000 Audi A4 N550,000 Audi A6 N400,000 BMW 3-Series N650,000 BMW 5- Series N450,000 BMW X5 N750,000 BMW X6 N550,000 Ford Escape N600,000 Ford Explorer N500,000 Honda Accord N350,000 Honda City N250,000 Honda Civic N300,000 Honda Crosstour N1,200,000 Honda CR-V N550,000 Honda Odyssey N650,000 Honda Pilot N850,000 Hyundai Accent N550,000 Hyundai Elantra N350,000 Infiniti FX35 N650,000 Infiniti FX45 N700,000 Infiniti QX4 N800,000 Isuzu Trooper N550,000 Jaguar S-Type N300,000 Jeep Liberty N700,000 Kia Sorento N550,000 Land Rover Discovery N800,000 Land Rover Freelander N1,000,000 Land Rover LR3 N850,000 Land Rover LR4 N750,000 Land Rover Range Rover N1,000,000 Land Rover N1500,000 Range Rover Sport N2000,000 Land Rover Vogue N1,000,000 Lexus GS N800,000 Lexus GX460 N600,000 Lexus GX470 N500,000 Lexus LX 570 N450,000 Lexus RX 300 N550,000 Lexus RX 330 N500,000 Lexus RX 350 N600,000 Mazda 6 N300,000 Mazda 626 N400,000 Mazda MPV N450,000 Mazda Tribute N500,000 Mercedes-Benz C-Class N400,000 Mercedes-Benz E-Class N500,000 Mercedes-Benz G-Class N300,000 Mercedes-Benz GLK N200,000 Mercedes-Benz ML N200,000 Mitsubishi Endeavour N350,000 Nissan Altima N300,000 Nissan Armada N550,000 Nissan Maxima N250,000 Nissan Murano N500,000 Nissan Pathfinder N500,000 Nissan Primera N250,000 Nissan Quest N500,000 Nissan Sentra N450,000 Nissan Xterra N400,000 Peugeot 406 N300,000 Peugeot 407 N200,000 Peugeot 607 N300,000 Toyota 4Runner N450,000 Toyota Avalon N500,000 Toyota Avensis N550,000 Toyota Camry N450,000 Toyota Camry 2.2 N350,000 Toyota Corolla N300,000 Toyota FJ Cruiser N650,000 Toyota Hiace N550,000 Toyota Highlander N550,000 Toyota HiLux N1,500,000 Toyota Matrix N370,000 Toyota Prado N900,000 Toyota Rav4 N450,000 Toyota Sequoia N650,000 Toyota Sienna N600,000 Toyota Tacoma N600,000 Toyota Tundra N1,500,000 Toyota Venza N750,000 Toyota Yaris N450,000 Volkswagen Beetle N200,000 Volkswagen Golf N250,000 Volkswagen Jetta N200,000 Volkswagen Passat N250,000 Volkswagen Touareg N300,000 NISSAN XTERA 2002 (N400,000) HONDA ACCORD 2003 (N350,000) HONDA ACCORD 2004 (N450,000) HONDA ACCORD 2009 (Nd50,000) TOYOTA COROLLA 2012 (650,000) TINY LIGHT TOYOTA CAMRY (N400,000)Call MRS olorunda glory 08067834923 Nigeria Custom Market; AUTHORIZED CAR SIGN BY THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA.😢
adamzubi 11y ago
http://googler700.blogspot.com/ http://googler700.blogspot.com/
adamzubi 11y ago
http://googler700.blogspot.com/ http://googler700.blogspot.com/
superkuh 11y ago
This page will reliably kill X.Org X Server 1.7.6 regardless of the browser used to render it.
- keithpeter 11y ago
  OK on xorg-server-1.9.5 which is pretty old. What GNU/Linux are you using? Debian Squeeze?
keithpeter 11y ago
Historically GCHQ has had a strong relationship and support from British government and politicians at government level probably reinforced by the 'troubles'. Mrs Thatcher altered the culture of the rank and file GCHQ staff by removing union representation and replacing it with a 'staff association'.
throwaway81922 11y ago
A somewhat philosophical question: what is the endgame here? Cracking codes was no doubt fundamental to winning the Second World War (and I would imagine all wars since the invention of the Caesar cipher) - but since then the motivation for surveillance appears to have from safeguarding the freedoms and rights of the people to an full-scale assault. We now have nation-wide surveillance of the British public (and no doubt the people of most other countries), who for the most part couldn't be of less interest if they tried. So what is the motivation for this? What is it about you or I that is so interesting to GCHQ/NSA?
- pjc50 11y ago
  The priority has been the same for hundreds of years: protect the Establishment from "subversives" threatening instability. This includes anyone leaking damaging true information. The grip seems to have loosened in recent years, partly due to overseas media and partly due to the security services genuinely having increasing panic over ISIS and Islamic radicalisation. What is being concealed? Not just Zircon, but all the persistent allegations of sexual assault on children. A lot of the stories that have surfaced include elements of either the Metropolitan police or MI5 taking over the files and then "losing" them or silently shutting down the inquiry.
- Mikushi 11y ago
  It's not a popular opinion, but what they are interested in is silencing and curbing any attempt to attack the current system, regardless of the merit and legitimacy of the "attackers" ( by that I mean activists, journalists, ...), they want to defend their position of power using all means necessary while pretending it's for "freedom & democracy"™. Their repeated attacks on the press, the persecution (at time violent, if not deadly) of activists/journalists, the illegal wars, the financing of terrorism, protection of known paedophiles,... The list of fucked up shit they pull is so long I personally have lost faith of anyone -in significant numbers- caring, because if you don't care right now, you'll never do.
  - pdkl95 11y ago
    It's called COINTELPRO. Just like "total information awareness", the program didn't really end; it was simply broken up and renamed.
twic 11y ago
> The next morning, as the New Statesman hit newsstands, I went early to Parliament to meet a friend and supporter, an MP named Robin Cook. He led me to a sanctuary in Parliament, where I could stay long enough to avoid being served by the authorities and get our story out safely. Robin Cook was one of the good guys. Interesting to know about a remaining enclave of asylum after our discussion recently: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9951283 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9951283

309 points by aarkay 11y ago

acqq 11y ago

The original source link with the new content: https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2015/08/03/life-unmasking-british-eavesdroppers/ https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2015/08/03/life-unmasking...

dang 11y ago
Yes. Url changed from http://techcrunch.com/2015/08/03/uncovering-echelon-the-top-secret-nsa-program-that-has-been-watching-you-your-entire-life/?ncid=rss&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Techcrunch+%28TechCrunch%29&utm_content=FaceBook&sr_share=facebook http://techcrunch.com/2015/08/03/uncovering-echelon-the-top-..., which points to this.

mirimir 11y ago

The Intercept: https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2015/08/03/life-unmasking-british-eavesdroppers/ https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2015/08/03/life-unmasking... There's lots of 1998-2001 stuff on cryptome.org :) Total TFH then. Now, not so much :(

happyscrappy 11y ago
Imagine what actually goes on now.
- mirimir 11y ago
  They intercept just about everything, for sure. And they apparently do a decent job at triage. But the false positive paradox is still problematic.[0] Epidemiology is a bitch ;) [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_positive_paradox https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_positive_paradox
  - TheOtherHobbes 11y ago
    I think it's more interesting to wonder how it's possible for the US to be surprised by movements like ISIS or by random shooters when surveillance is supposed to be total. Obviously there are many ways in which information can be lost between source and policy. But it's still strange that some events appear to be a complete surprise. If Snowden and Campbell are correct, they really shouldn't be.
    - e12e 11y ago
      There's the possibility that total electronic surveillance is real and that it's no good at countering the kind of threats it supposedly is used against. If you want conspiracy, consider this: what impact did the #occupy movement have on the world order? That certainly was more dangerous to the establishment than someone scaring the population with terror attacks. Or if you believe the official story: who are all the people assassinated with extra-legal (from an international law perspective, anyway) drone strikes in Yemen? Are they enemies of the US?
      - TeMPOraL 11y ago
        > what impact did the #occupy movement have on the world order? Exactly none? People just shouted for a while, maybe burned a few cars, and then they got bored with it. Terror attack on the other hand tend to scare the living shit and every remaining ounce of rational thought out of people. People worldwide supported two wars over 9/11.
    - jacquesm 11y ago
      Mass surveillance may simply be less useful. There are people that use the fact that 'it works' as an argument pro-surveillance. I don't agree with that argument but it gets used quite frequently. Now imagine how bad it would be if all this mass surveillance went on and it wasn't even effective. That's no way to get a bigger budget next year. So Snowden and Campbell are likely correct and those that argue that 'it works' could very well be wrong at the same time.
    - TeMPOraL 11y ago
api 11y ago
Time seems to have had a way of vindicating at least some tin foil hatters, yet people today are just as ready to dismiss as 'crazy conspiracy theory' any similar extrapolations or speculations. If you strip off the really genuinely nutty stuff, quite a bit of what I remember reading nutters talk about on places like Usenet alt.conspiracy in the 1990s is now reality. Some of what's now reality would have made them blush. The conspiranoids would have called you crazy if you'd suggested that everyone would be carrying devices that constantly report their location at all times to central servers owned by closely state-connected corporations -- and that people would accept this willingly and even pay out of pocket for these devices themselves.
- pdkl95 11y ago
  > dismiss as 'crazy conspiracy theory' This is simply a current example of the political strategy known as the paranoid style. Just like the fear about "reds" in McCarthyism and various right-wing groups that used racial fears for political gain, there has been a very succcessful application of the paranoid style against the very idea of investigating the intelligence community. If you (or anybody else) haven't read it, I suggest reading the original essay[1] on the subject. It may be over 50 year old, but it is probably one of the more important essays for understanding the modern (~post-WW2) American politics and how "conspiracy theory" has been used as a way of rallying people against "the enemy". [1] http://harpers.org/archive/1964/11/the-paranoid-style-in-american-politics/ http://harpers.org/archive/1964/11/the-paranoid-style-in-ame...
- tedunangst 11y ago
  > If you strip off the really genuinely nutty stuff, quite a bit of what I remember reading nutters talk about on places like Usenet alt.conspiracy in the 1990s is now reality. well, yeah. if you ignore all the crazy, what's left isn't crazy. why is that surprising? > The conspiranoids would have called you crazy if you'd suggested that everyone would be carrying devices that constantly report their location at all times would they? that seems like a pretty obvious consequence of carrying a cell phone. maybe my recollection is different, but i don't think people were saying "the government reads your email" was a crazy idea. they were saying "the government reads your email on their secret moon base staffed by hitler clones" was a crazy idea. if you want to make the argument that the hatters were right all along but were wrongly dismissed, find a specific claim that was made, and a specific counterclaim. these "right all along" discussions always slide into unfalsifiable generalities and strawmen.
TeMPOraL 11y ago
I'm very reluctant to dismiss anything as tinfoilhattery nowadays. I always thought that people afraid of "chemtrails" are paranoid and believe obviously silly stories. Because why would anyone do that? And then very recently, on HN of all places, I learned that US Government did in fact spray bacteria on their own civilians for biowarfare research purposes, without the public knowing for decades. It's getting harder to distinguish the crazy from the truth. I still don't believe in faked Moon landing though.

shahryc 11y ago

"Since then, the program has largely been presented to the public only through posts on government surveillance/conspiracy forum..." ------ I guess the conspiracy theorists weren't that crazy after all.

guimarin 11y ago

Back when I was a kid, Enemy of the State was not a documentary. But really, if you cared about Privacy/Security at all since the 80's you'd've known about Echelon, Echelon II, etc. You've also read up on ThinThread and Trailblazer. My favorite is the No Such Agency adjunct that pulled like $200m a year in funding with 3 people in the division. Well and this patch: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/cb/Logo_of_Infrared_Space_Systems_Directorate.png https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/cb/Logo_of_... quite literally the greatest US Gov't Patch of all time.

codezero 11y ago
I've always been partial to this one: https://i.imgur.com/XaIWseY.jpg https://i.imgur.com/XaIWseY.jpg
- WiseWeasel 11y ago
  Sure, that's a great example of classic Bond-villain-like appeal, but I still have to recognize the design team who pushed this work of an entirely different level of greatness through committee approval: http://www.nro.gov/images/launches/nrol-66/NROL-66-patch.jpg http://www.nro.gov/images/launches/nrol-66/NROL-66-patch.jpg
- kristofferR 11y ago
  http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3c/NROL49_patch.jpg http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3c/NROL49_pa... The text translates to: "Better the devil that you know".
wozniacki 11y ago
A 2006 Italian movie, "In ascolto" ( The Listening ) [1] [2] [3] presents a much more realistic plot. [1] The Listening (film) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Listening_(film) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Listening_(film) [2] NYT Review http://www.nytimes.com/movies/movie/351999/The-Listening/overview http://www.nytimes.com/movies/movie/351999/The-Listening/ove... [3] Trailer - The Listening (2006) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZlVK906Xzr8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZlVK906Xzr8

signaler 11y ago

First learned about ECHELON in Robert Ludlum's Bourne series: http://bourne.wikia.com/wiki/ECHELON http://bourne.wikia.com/wiki/ECHELON The key difference being that this is trunk VOIP ingestion, not the more sinister PRISM and TURMOIL stuff which is much more invasive

1arity 11y ago

A Moral Thesis in Defense of Surveillance People talk about civil freedoms, and they incorrectly attribute lack of surveillance the status of a civil freedom. Freedom from observation is not freedom, freedom from incorrect enforcement is freedom. Observation does not alter the moral scope of the individual, or the moral scope of the society. The individual's choice to limit their own moral scope under observation is what limits their scope. Surveillance does not affect the effective moral scope. Enforcement defines the ( effective ) moral scope ( the scope of actions that individuals can do without expecting hindrance from society ). More comprehensive surveillance, leads to more clear enforcement, and more clear enforcement preserves in clearer definition those freedoms which are expressly not prohibited under the moral scope of a society. Surveillance is a tool of freedom. Specifically, a tool that contributes to preserving the freedom of action of individuals by contributing to more effective enforcement. Without surveillance the machinery of enforcement can be more messily and liberally applied. The fake left doctrines complain about surveillance as a tool of oppression. Surveillance is seen in fact a tool of freedom, it is the light shone upon. The fake left doctrine has framed the entire debate incorrectly. Absence of surveillance is not a civil freedom, it is in fact an assurance of imprecisely applied enforcement. Surveillance is a civil freedom. Lawful enforcement is a civil freedom. The remaining civil freedoms, known as "civil liberties" are those things permitted by an individual's effective moral scope. Civil liberties, like morals in general, are not absolute, they are the choices made by societies to define themselves at a particular time and place. ( The color of absolutism is invoked because that promotes harmony -- if something is absolute it is beyond question. This is not a real admission of absolute, simply a shorthand for a society saying the debate about this way we define ourselves is complete, for now. ) Civil freedoms are distinguished from civil liberties in that civil freedoms include those acts, two of which are defined above, which effect whatever civil liberties are chosen. Civil freedoms include the machinery of creation of civil liberties. The relationship between the state and the individual is somewhat akin to that between a parent and a baby. A baby is many things, and it is also helpless and chaotic without the governance of the parent. The parent's attentive observation ( surveillance ) of the baby presents the baby from harming itself. The state's attentive surveillance of the individuals presents them from harming themselves and others. If large groups of individuals were capable of governing themselves in an ad-hoc fashion then...the internet, reddit, all of these places would be domains of inclusion, tolerance, peace, and respect. In fact, moderators, and moderators of moderators, and policies, and a central authority are required to prevent chaos and harm. These things ( observations and controls -- surveillance and enforcement ) are the very enablers of the same liberties that the fake left doctrine purports they destroy. The fake left doctrines complain about surveillance as a tool of oppression. They use "freedom" in an intangible, absolute sense. A mythological "Perfect Freedom of the Individual", a delusion that fails to acknowledge the social context in which any freedom of action exists. These fake left doctrines are founded on a delusion of a freedom unhindered by a social context. They are the fake left's dream of the mythical Powerful Individual, a delusion to compensate for the collective belief of the fake left of the powerlessness of the individual against some mythical oppressive force. In fact, for an individual exposed only to lawful restriction of their action, their only powerlessness is their fabrication of their own powerlessness. The mythical oppressor of the fake left is in fact, not the lawful surveillance state, it is the individual that chooses to believe itself powerless. Surveillance is not oppression, incorrectly applied enforcement is the very definition of oppression. And as the net of surveillance is narrowed, a broader net of enforcement must be cast to protect individuals from themselves. The fundamental that the fake left has not grasped is that the trade off is not between "broader freedoms and broader surveillance" it is between "broader surveillance or broader enforcement", and broader enforcement, without the information, is going to be incorrectly applied.

godgod 11y ago

1984 is here. This must end otherwise we are not free.

sandworm101 11y ago

The problem with Echalon-type programs today is cultural. They were/are intelligence operations. But today "intelligence" has grown to encompass criminal investigations and targeted, violent, operations such as drone strikes. An intelligence operation does not need to be 100% accurate. Huge volumes of less-than-perfect data are examined by experts who then issue reports, opinions, on what is actually happening. The top report would be the sort of things included in a president's daily briefing. That was basic cold-war intelligence. Today's leaders expect surveillance to be absolute. They don't want "and increased likelihood of attack", they want "Mr. Smith will be onboard flight 123 at 2pm". That's the level you need to send a bunch of cops to lawfully and publicly arrest a specific person and take them to a court for prosecution. Such things require very different methods, methods for which ECHALON was never designed.

toyg 11y ago
> today "intelligence" has grown to encompass criminal investigations That's a function of changed political objectives. "The enemy" became a liquid definition, purely for political reasons: "Arab terrorism" can easily be redefined as OLP or Taliban or Iran or AQ or IS or or or, keeping the public "at war" indefinitely and impeding scrutiny of reigning confusion in foreign policy. Until that stops, it's politically very difficult to fight calls for "more intelligence to stop our planes blowing up". Unfortunately, the US (and EU allies, especially France and Britain) have now managed to screw up an entire continent so much, that a clear statement of interest to "reset" this state of things is almost impossible. In comparison, Vietnam and Cambodia were a walk in the park.

teh_klev 11y ago

I remember the Zircon affair quite vividly. At the time I was a 20 year old student union activist, CND member (still a member) and involved in the Scottish independence movement (SNP member when it was unfashionable). A couple of days after BBC Scotland was raided by Special Branch a bunch of us attended a viewing of the "banned" Secret Society "Zircon" programme in Edinburgh in the City Chambers (I think). Duncan Campbell was present and gave a short introduction. It was a positively electrifying event. I managed to get hold of a copy of the episode for distribution and viewing at my college. It was handed to me in a jiffy bag, the VHS video cassette was labelled "Mickey Mouse", I think I have it in a box somewhere.

wrboyce 11y ago
Is this[1] the programme you refer to? [1]: https://vimeo.com/44948377 https://vimeo.com/44948377
- teh_klev 11y ago
  Yes, that's the one. Seems like a storm in a teacup now.
- billybofh 11y ago
  I've been looking for a copy of that for ages - thank you!
- pbhjpbhj 11y ago
  At 19:19 it's hilarious - British Aerospace gave the game away about the 3rd "Skynet" satellite being at 53deg East instead of where it should be, then that info was rescinded in later releases (showing it was important), then the centre for tracking the Skynet satellites (in this segment) only has 2 tracking dishes. British SigInt were really, really bad at lying it seems. Or, was this just the diversion ...
- teh_klev 11y ago
  Also worth a watch, Mr Campbell himself giving a talk at The Register Christmas Lecture: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qJfFOJVRMNU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qJfFOJVRMNU

evilhaskeller 11y ago

I remember an IRC channel about security in the early 2000s. Somehow we started discussing government surveillance, and someone mentioned ECHELON. People's reactions were interesting: most people immediately dismissed it as being "impossible", or "another conspiracy theory". It makes me sad.

yborg 11y ago
How quickly we forget. Long before that, back in the USENET days, it was a common joke to include a .sig line "for the ECHELON line reader" with a list of words that the presumed NSA computer would match against, like "KGB nuclear anthrax bioweapon" etc. The joke being that if everyone would include these, they would end up having to analyze the entire newsgroup feed.
- SapphireSun 11y ago
  Heh, there's an emacs command for that too. M-x spook
- carbocation 11y ago
  I took that more as a subversive act, rather than as a joke.
colllectorof 11y ago
Yeah. The worst part, though, is that a lot of the same people now did a 180 and reside firmly in the "I have nothing to hide" camp. They jumped from dismissing global surveillance as too far-fetched and intrusive for reality straight to dismissing it as a triviality not worthy of further though. These people have no imagination, that's the problem. They could not imagine the possibilities, which were easily guessable at the time if you knew anything about technology. Now, they cannot imagine the consequences, which are easily guessable if you know anything about people and intelligence agencies.
- Mikushi 11y ago
  That's what happens when the ones in charge have a deep understanding of the human mind and how trivial it is to shape it and the ideas/values it contains. As I said in another thread, unrelated, things like propaganda and by association advertising are unethical at best, it's subversion/coercion on a massive scale, it truly shapes people in something they are not. And they count on the fact that people reject the fact that they are easily manipulated (applies for me too).

sr_banksy 11y ago

Great insight into how free-speech, freedom of press and privacy laws work and have evolved on both sides of the Atlantic. Having lived on either end of the pond as an average citizen, I know the American Press enjoys greater and truer freedom. They hold the legislators accountable. The British press, on the other hand, felt malleable, made to bend any which way the government choose. The BBC creates invaluable programming, but also is bound to the government by the purse. It always felt like the government meddled with its affairs. And now some great to get some historical context into it as well!

sr_banksy 11y ago

olorundaglory 11y ago

GREETINGS TO EVERYONE OF YOU THAT IS READING THIS, ADVERTISEMENT HAS BEEN ADVERTISE IN ALL OVER THE NATION AND WEBSITE E.G TOKUNBO WEBSITE,NTA NEWS, AIT NEWS, OSRC, ITV, FM STATION, NEWSPAPER ETC, We deal in all cars, you can also make a request for the vehicle you want to purchase and also your budget for any vehicle, we shall call you back to inform you about it. we have these cars for sale right now. WE HAVE DIRECT TOKUNBO CARS VERY CLEAN AND BRAND NEW CARS FOR SALE AT A CHEAPER PRICES. These cars were seized by government officials at border and the time duration given to the owners to claim their cars has elapse so they are been sold in a give away price. All you need do is to call on 554 OR CALL MRS olorunda glory on 08067834923 OR EMAIL US ON Nigeriacustomauctionservice@yahoo.com WE HAVE THOSE VEHICLE FOR SALE NOW: TOYOTA HIGH LANDER 2003 - 2012 (N500,000) HONDA CRV 2000 - 2009 (N550,000) TOYOTA COROLLA 2003 - 2006 (N300,000) TOYOTA MATRIX 2005 - 2010 (N450,000) TOYOTA ALVALLON 2004 (N500,000) Acura MDX N500,000 Acura TL N400,000 Acura ZDX N700,000 Audi A4 N550,000 Audi A6 N400,000 BMW 3-Series N650,000 BMW 5- Series N450,000 BMW X5 N750,000 BMW X6 N550,000 Ford Escape N600,000 Ford Explorer N500,000 Honda Accord N350,000 Honda City N250,000 Honda Civic N300,000 Honda Crosstour N1,200,000 Honda CR-V N550,000 Honda Odyssey N650,000 Honda Pilot N850,000 Hyundai Accent N550,000 Hyundai Elantra N350,000 Infiniti FX35 N650,000 Infiniti FX45 N700,000 Infiniti QX4 N800,000 Isuzu Trooper N550,000 Jaguar S-Type N300,000 Jeep Liberty N700,000 Kia Sorento N550,000 Land Rover Discovery N800,000 Land Rover Freelander N1,000,000 Land Rover LR3 N850,000 Land Rover LR4 N750,000 Land Rover Range Rover N1,000,000 Land Rover N1500,000 Range Rover Sport N2000,000 Land Rover Vogue N1,000,000 Lexus GS N800,000 Lexus GX460 N600,000 Lexus GX470 N500,000 Lexus LX 570 N450,000 Lexus RX 300 N550,000 Lexus RX 330 N500,000 Lexus RX 350 N600,000 Mazda 6 N300,000 Mazda 626 N400,000 Mazda MPV N450,000 Mazda Tribute N500,000 Mercedes-Benz C-Class N400,000 Mercedes-Benz E-Class N500,000 Mercedes-Benz G-Class N300,000 Mercedes-Benz GLK N200,000 Mercedes-Benz ML N200,000 Mitsubishi Endeavour N350,000 Nissan Altima N300,000 Nissan Armada N550,000 Nissan Maxima N250,000 Nissan Murano N500,000 Nissan Pathfinder N500,000 Nissan Primera N250,000 Nissan Quest N500,000 Nissan Sentra N450,000 Nissan Xterra N400,000 Peugeot 406 N300,000 Peugeot 407 N200,000 Peugeot 607 N300,000 Toyota 4Runner N450,000 Toyota Avalon N500,000 Toyota Avensis N550,000 Toyota Camry N450,000 Toyota Camry 2.2 N350,000 Toyota Corolla N300,000 Toyota FJ Cruiser N650,000 Toyota Hiace N550,000 Toyota Highlander N550,000 Toyota HiLux N1,500,000 Toyota Matrix N370,000 Toyota Prado N900,000 Toyota Rav4 N450,000 Toyota Sequoia N650,000 Toyota Sienna N600,000 Toyota Tacoma N600,000 Toyota Tundra N1,500,000 Toyota Venza N750,000 Toyota Yaris N450,000 Volkswagen Beetle N200,000 Volkswagen Golf N250,000 Volkswagen Jetta N200,000 Volkswagen Passat N250,000 Volkswagen Touareg N300,000 NISSAN XTERA 2002 (N400,000) HONDA ACCORD 2003 (N350,000) HONDA ACCORD 2004 (N450,000) HONDA ACCORD 2009 (Nd50,000) TOYOTA COROLLA 2012 (650,000) TINY LIGHT TOYOTA CAMRY (N400,000)Call MRS olorunda glory 08067834923 Nigeria Custom Market; AUTHORIZED CAR SIGN BY THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA.😢

adamzubi 11y ago

http://googler700.blogspot.com/ http://googler700.blogspot.com/

adamzubi 11y ago

http://googler700.blogspot.com/ http://googler700.blogspot.com/

superkuh 11y ago

This page will reliably kill X.Org X Server 1.7.6 regardless of the browser used to render it.

keithpeter 11y ago
OK on xorg-server-1.9.5 which is pretty old. What GNU/Linux are you using? Debian Squeeze?

keithpeter 11y ago

Historically GCHQ has had a strong relationship and support from British government and politicians at government level probably reinforced by the 'troubles'. Mrs Thatcher altered the culture of the rank and file GCHQ staff by removing union representation and replacing it with a 'staff association'.

throwaway81922 11y ago

A somewhat philosophical question: what is the endgame here? Cracking codes was no doubt fundamental to winning the Second World War (and I would imagine all wars since the invention of the Caesar cipher) - but since then the motivation for surveillance appears to have from safeguarding the freedoms and rights of the people to an full-scale assault. We now have nation-wide surveillance of the British public (and no doubt the people of most other countries), who for the most part couldn't be of less interest if they tried. So what is the motivation for this? What is it about you or I that is so interesting to GCHQ/NSA?

pjc50 11y ago
The priority has been the same for hundreds of years: protect the Establishment from "subversives" threatening instability. This includes anyone leaking damaging true information. The grip seems to have loosened in recent years, partly due to overseas media and partly due to the security services genuinely having increasing panic over ISIS and Islamic radicalisation. What is being concealed? Not just Zircon, but all the persistent allegations of sexual assault on children. A lot of the stories that have surfaced include elements of either the Metropolitan police or MI5 taking over the files and then "losing" them or silently shutting down the inquiry.
Mikushi 11y ago
It's not a popular opinion, but what they are interested in is silencing and curbing any attempt to attack the current system, regardless of the merit and legitimacy of the "attackers" ( by that I mean activists, journalists, ...), they want to defend their position of power using all means necessary while pretending it's for "freedom & democracy"™. Their repeated attacks on the press, the persecution (at time violent, if not deadly) of activists/journalists, the illegal wars, the financing of terrorism, protection of known paedophiles,... The list of fucked up shit they pull is so long I personally have lost faith of anyone -in significant numbers- caring, because if you don't care right now, you'll never do.
- pdkl95 11y ago
  It's called COINTELPRO. Just like "total information awareness", the program didn't really end; it was simply broken up and renamed.

twic 11y ago

> The next morning, as the New Statesman hit newsstands, I went early to Parliament to meet a friend and supporter, an MP named Robin Cook. He led me to a sanctuary in Parliament, where I could stay long enough to avoid being served by the authorities and get our story out safely. Robin Cook was one of the good guys. Interesting to know about a remaining enclave of asylum after our discussion recently: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9951283 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9951283