Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
zppln
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
61.
▲
by
zppln
1y ago
I was thinking more in terms of it being a newer design. From what I've gathered there's some work being done on new engine designs within the FCAS program, but I have no idea how it's going.
62.
▲
by
zppln
1y ago
More specifically, we could use our own engine. Gripen E still rely on the GE F414. Europe has nothing to rival the P&W F135.
63.
▲
by
zppln
1y ago
Ehm, fairly sure you can use Jira in an air-gapped environment.
64.
▲
by
zppln
1y ago
I can recommend this episode as well. If I don't mix things up they gave some very good examples of how everyday life wasn't that much different from what it is now. Amazing how stuff like that can be communicated through identat
65.
▲
by
zppln
1y ago
Seems like a bit entitled to expect being able to go around rewriting stuff and then have the old maintainers maintain it.
66.
▲
by
zppln
1y ago
Very sad read. Much of the multi-billion dollar project I work on is built on top of libxml2 and my company doesn't have a clue. Fuck, even most of my colleagues working with XML every day don't even know it because they only inte
67.
▲
by
zppln
1y ago
And those stars will go out as well.
68.
▲
by
zppln
1y ago
> out of their system I spent some time last year digging around in Wayland and I've got to admit that I was surprised to learn that there really isn't anything really there. Like, there is no "system". I had read tha
69.
▲
by
zppln
1y ago
We use C++ at my shop for Level A and of course we very much restrict it. But the restrictions are more due to reducing the scope of what you need to show for your compiler. > or just malloc everything all at once? Yes! But here's t
70.
▲
by
zppln
1y ago
And it never will be. In aviation we certify three things: aircraft, engines and propellers. Everything else is at best certifiable , i.e. can be integrated into a product to be certified assuming all deviations, restrictions, caveats etc
71.
▲
by
zppln
1y ago
This is my experience as well. People need to ask themselves what benefits Rust would bring to an high assurance system (e.g. DO-178C Level A). You're not gonna want to malloc mid-flight even if you have a borrow checker. The entire po
72.
▲
by
zppln
1y ago
Icon selection definitely plays a part. Flat, monochrome icons are just garbage. A particularly bad example is editing a page in Confluence where you know there should be a button for e.g. fill color but you can't find it because every
73.
▲
by
zppln
1y ago
> you need to ”be someone”, not ”understand something” or ”be able to do something” This very succinctly describes the entire management class here in Sweden... The public sector is run by incompetent people who have to buy consultants t
74.
▲
by
zppln
1y ago
So much this. They haven't even paywalled it behind Premium. They know they're dealing crack. Such a disgusting company.
75.
▲
by
zppln
1y ago
Indeed. A friend of mine is a motion designer (and a quite talented one at that) and he goes on and on about how AI is gonna take is job away any day soon. And sure, there are all these tools popping up basically enabling people to do (some
76.
▲
by
zppln
1y ago
Meh, /pol/ leaks but people also gets called out for it all the time. Overall I'd say containment style moderation like the one 4chan has works pretty well if you're looking to host "discussion" of a wide varit
77.
▲
by
zppln
1y ago
Oh, I think they're already up there with the aesthetics, I just don't find the content appealing. I watched (on Netflix) some Chinese attempt at a Downton Abbey a few years ago, and the production value was through the roof, abso
78.
▲
by
zppln
1y ago
> cultural super power My impression is that Chinese culture has very little appeal elsewhere (at least in the West). They can't seem to be able to (or care to) package it in an appealing way. Sure, they're being catered to in
79.
▲
by
zppln
2y ago
No one cares as long as the end product is worse and doesn't satisfy the users' requirements. If we want people to use non-American alternatives we need to build alternatives that are straight up better, which is exactly what the
80.
▲
by
zppln
2y ago
And the same people who would previously chain themselves to an oil well are now setting Teslas on fire. Up is down and down is up.
81.
▲
by
zppln
2y ago
Built in the US and sold by Electrolux, yes.
82.
▲
by
zppln
2y ago
Sure. My microwave from 1988 is about the only thing made in the US in my home (interstingly an Electrolux). However, every purchase I make is with a Visa card. Most services I use are American. And as I'm typing this... anyone know a
83.
▲
by
zppln
2y ago
While I do find it an interesting exercise to reflect over my own choices of products and services and consider how I could divest myself from relying on ones provided by US companies (and I do agree Europe is too reliant on the US in some
84.
▲
by
zppln
2y ago
> Also that simplicity is king. Complexity is the enemy. I don't know anything about B-52s, but I work on a project where we are essentially replacing a 40 year old weapon system with a new one. The new one should of course do the s
85.
▲
by
zppln
2y ago
The same could be said for proposing it...
86.
▲
by
zppln
2y ago
I got actual nerve damage from playing Anno 1404 crosslegged for a 16 hours a day for a few days straight a decade or so ago...
87.
▲
by
zppln
2y ago
> how many industries that trade in real goods have margins in excess of 25%? The fentanyl industry maybe?
88.
▲
by
zppln
2y ago
Would it be possible to achieve the same 8 hours of operation between charges?
89.
▲
by
zppln
2y ago
And the MBA person (at my company this is everyone in middle management) is also the person who go around and suggest we shoehorn AI into everything...
90.
▲
by
zppln
2y ago
Depending on your definition of sea: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aral_Sea
More ›