zasdffaa

68 ms·

781.
by zasdffaa 5y ago
> So, I am looking for a customizable query parser, planner, and execution engine That looks like an entire DB engine, isn't it? > map the public schema to the private schema sounds like view. It seems like a pretty major project
782.
by zasdffaa 5y ago
> We've never had a rule change from being beneficial to detrimental Whatever you're doing is really confusing me (see my prev post). A multi-thousand line piece of the SQL I wrote was tested on mssql 2019 and there was a blata
783.
by zasdffaa 5y ago
Hmm? This doesn't make much sense. MSSQL does these already I think (except the first) . - Inlining scalar function calls (less impactful now with Sql Server 2019) write them as table valued funcs and it'll inline them for you (ug
784.
by zasdffaa 5y ago
> AMEL IA here. If you're not one of Tony Stark's AIs, what might this mean?
785.
by zasdffaa 5y ago
Top 3 rows seem to be dials/knobs to twiddle, is that right? They are so close together even that female model's hand looks like it would have trouble grasping one of them without forcing aside the knobs next to it. AKA they seem
786.
by zasdffaa 5y ago
Perhaps link to a few such testimonies? I can see eg. < https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31057311 > where people are explaining why an edit might not have been accepted for good reason. Make a case instead of compla
787.
by zasdffaa 5y ago
I see your point, and I repeat I'm not arguing with you, I don't have the knowledge you clearly do, but onion layer security is I guess useful when mistakes are made - > Lets say you create a encrypted LUKS partition with a 32
788.
by zasdffaa 5y ago
You are confused about wiki, it's encyclopaedic articles and an overview, a good jumping off point (that's what the references at the bottom of the page are for, does this help https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ma
789.
by zasdffaa 5y ago
Another "wikipedia is shite but I'm not going to give any examples and I'm going to ignore the fact I could have edited it to make it better but didn't" post.
790.
by zasdffaa 5y ago
Thanks for the dissection, I really agree there's far too much uncritical adulation of 'art' - "famous person did this so it's very good, and don't contradict". I think art is a personal thing, a matter of
791.
by zasdffaa 5y ago
I'm really in no position to argue with you but still, isn't onion-layer security better than single layer, and isn't this one more layer?
792.
by zasdffaa 5y ago
His question is interesting (I have often wondered similarly) but your response is also interesting. So... > unless you believe you have some sort of innate fundamental morality to suggest otherwise would be to say that most people don&
793.
by zasdffaa 5y ago
A serious, non-trolling question to all. I've not had a TV for decades and for me that's a good thing. I've watched TVs in pubs (I'm in the uk) and round my mates' houses so it's not become some strange alien t
794.
by zasdffaa 5y ago
> Do we have evidence that it is not possible to.. No, I don't think so, it's just that no-one's ever been able to construct a perpetual motion machine, so that inability is codified into a presumption that energy can&#x27
795.
by zasdffaa 5y ago
I look to good critics and they do help, but in the end what a critic wants to watch will differ from the average pleb like me because they do a lot of watching. I suppose it might be put thus: If you're eating out every day because th
796.
by zasdffaa 5y ago
> why people sometimes have a hard time changing their mind when confronted with new information Something else happens with me, it's like my brain says "this does not fit in with what I understand, discard it". At a consc
797.
by zasdffaa 5y ago
Your link doesn't say anything about spuds and/or clay, something I'd consider deeply dubious. AFAK tater toxins take considerable heat to denature. A reference would be very interesting, thanks.
798.
by zasdffaa 5y ago
"Those Ottomans knew how to eat!" Very important rider - the rich or well-off ones did. Peasants, who were the greatest majority, subsisted on a lot of cheap bread/rice with a very little meat or other protein thrown in, an
799.
by zasdffaa 5y ago
Given the list of animals that have, or may < https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mirror_test#Mammals > why would it be so astounding to add a dog to that list? (NB, I don't know where I saw it but if you look at &l
800.
by zasdffaa 5y ago
Agreed. If an HN poster doesn't start cleaning their hair after looking in a mirror, their account should be cancelled to prevent further posting. That would work. (err, that's what you meant, right?)
801.
by zasdffaa 5y ago
Argh, no, I meant the article itself < https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30978283 >.
802.
by zasdffaa 5y ago
1. Why is this flagged suddenly? HN seems a little flag-happy at times 2. ... anyway, solution which works for me quite well, if main browser does this shit start emacs, M-x eww RET and yank in your copied URL. This gets rid of a lot of cru
803.
by zasdffaa 5y ago
> an infamous troll on comp.lang.lisp Are you perhaps confusing him with Erik Naggum, cos there just happens to be a post on HN about Erik right now. And Erik could be something special when a fuse blew!
804.
by zasdffaa 5y ago
Things to hate about HN: the large number of nearly-nothing responses like this. I wish people would instead suggest something constructive like 'make some vids and put them on youtube so we can judge for ourselves'.
805.
by zasdffaa 5y ago
My own MP (I'm in the UK) has been willing to respond to my letters on climate change but not actually do anything. My plan, when time permits, is to publish the responses, and especially the lack of responses. Public bodies hate bad p
806.
by zasdffaa 5y ago
It certainly can be, but some people do it by choice, and like it, and make good money from it. That's not wrong in my books.
807.
by zasdffaa 5y ago
> Why again the Victorian moral project and supposed "prudery" was in the wrong, in the first place? Not sure I understand. From wiktionary, for 'prude': "A person who is or tries to be excessively proper, especi
808.
by zasdffaa 5y ago
Doing so will help embitter and then destroy those companies which do have good intent.
809.
by zasdffaa 5y ago
IIRC shulgin worked in a lab developing this stuff (sandoz?). He could just be giving his observations of practices at work. It is unclear though. Then again < https://dirtworship.wordpress.com/2013/04/18/sa
810.
by zasdffaa 5y ago
That's an impressive level of bikeshedding. Do you really think it matters? I mean, really anything in the world but your mood going to get worse if it's spelt in a way you dislike? (brit here, cares little if it's spelt ph o

More ›