4 ms·
You are confused about wiki, it's encyclopaedic articles and an overview, a good jumping off point (that's what the references at the bottom of the page are for
by zasdffaa 5y ago
You are confused about wiki, it's encyclopaedic articles and an overview, a good jumping off point (that's what the references at the bottom of the page are for, does this help https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Master_boot_record#References https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Master_boot_record#References), not the sum of all human knowledge
"If i have to edit it to make it accurate, why should i rely on wikipedia in the first place?"
And there we have it, the entitlement with no expectation of giving anything back. It's for other people too. You're not the only person who uses wiki, you just haven't realised it yet.
- blueflow 5y agoMy recommendation for other people: Read the primary sources! They are the source of truth, there is no need to rely on wikipedia editors or journalists to rephrase it correctly, which they are often unable to. Just bypass wikipedia. Your implication that its something that the world requires is not correct.
- NoSorryCannot 5y agoHmmm... [citation needed]
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]