za3faran

12 ms·

211.
by za3faran 1y ago
The local culture was indeed preserved; anyone can verify this, it's a historical given. I'm not victim blaming. The orientalists were not victims were they? > There is a reason no non-Muslims are interested in living under a M
212.
by za3faran 1y ago
The Palestinians in Gaza and the entirety of Palestine trace their roots to 3000+ years ago actually.
213.
by za3faran 1y ago
I personally know such jews actually. We salute anyone standing against oppression of the Palestinians from the brutality they have been facing for over 75 years now.
214.
by za3faran 1y ago
Go watch the many documentaries about Gaza, then tell us it is not brutally oppressed. The fact of the matter is that Palestinians have been treated atrociously for over 75 years now. The West Bank is not much better off either by the way.
215.
by za3faran 1y ago
Such organization doesn't exist actually, it's a zionist straw man.
216.
by za3faran 1y ago
israel literally are able to cut off food, water, electricity, internet at their own whim, they're doing it as we speak. They are actively blocking aid and food from going in. Read the news. There are many anti-zionist jews as well spe
217.
JEP 513: Flexible Constructor Bodies: Final for JDK25(openjdk.org)
2 points by za3faran 1y ago|0 comments
218.
by za3faran 1y ago
They literally control the air, water, electricity, food, internet, everything. They are literally mass starving the Gazans as we speak.
219.
by za3faran 2y ago
From searching: > The term appears in the serial fiction "Consolaçam 10" by Ron Singer, where it is described as one of several newly enacted laws that forced Jews to flee their homeland due to such humiliating and discriminato
220.
by za3faran 2y ago
Aid is not completely cut off because of the zionists. Check the news. War crime after war crime while the whole world watches.
221.
by za3faran 2y ago
I noticed the URL, that doesn't change what I wrote: the article itself is empty. Just being posted on a upenn URL doesn't make it automatically authentic nor academic. There is no evidence of the "dung gatherer decree"
222.
by za3faran 2y ago
I emailed you, still waiting for the response
223.
by za3faran 2y ago
Show us the evidence that they were required to dismount. The article you cited mentions no references, just mentions it in passing. This is not academic nor acceptable. I refuted all accusations unless proper evidence is brought up. It is
224.
by za3faran 2y ago
There are clear interviews with zionist members confessing their crimes, so yes, the evidence is there. There is a reason that the whole world is against what israel is doing, except the US who is supporting it.
225.
by za3faran 2y ago
That is literally taken from the UN report. There are no videos of rape, and there are articles showing that no one came forth for eye witnesses. The fact of the matter is that all of "evidence" was strictly by the israeli side, w
226.
by za3faran 2y ago
We know very well in fact. The Palestinians are the original Canaanites and even descendants of the original Israelites. This is well established. What happened is that europe continued their colonization and used what Germanhy did to the j
227.
by za3faran 2y ago
The UN that is controlled by western colonialist nations? That one has the right to draw borders? LOL. Are you aware of Sykes Picot and Balfour? Are you aware that this has been planned for a long time now, since at least 1899[1]? There mos
228.
by za3faran 2y ago
This "argument" again. I swear it's always the same trite copy-pasted ones. This is not open for debate - there is mass starvation, there are war crimes, the ICC is after the heads of the mafia. There are many, many documenta
229.
by za3faran 2y ago
I already responded from the official UN report. There is zero evidence of rape, let alone gang rape, let alone gang rape of corpses (wut?): https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43605561
230.
by za3faran 2y ago
Yes please send them to me. Not only has the story of the "40 beheaded babies" been declared a hoax, there is zero proof of rape, let alone gang raping of corpses, let alone burning babies alive. This is the first I've heard
231.
by za3faran 2y ago
Who is burning babies alive and gangraping corpses? We know that israel has been killing children for a long time now, and they have been recorded raping prisoners.
232.
by za3faran 2y ago
The british were not there in 1899 when colonization was being prepared[1]. Jews coexisted with the native Palestinians before the british occupation[2][3], but this clearly is something else. Palestinians are native to the area, they were
233.
by za3faran 2y ago
That's like saying there were pictures of jews who were not malnuritioned during the holocaust, so it must be fake! There are many who died from starvation, this is a fact. Don't be a genocide denier. The israelis have been contro
234.
by za3faran 2y ago
It was a rhetorical question. You will find an article in the NYT from 1899 talking about the plan to occupy Palestine. They knew and saw it coming. Of course we are against attacking civilians, but nothing happens in vacuum.
235.
by za3faran 2y ago
They were occupied by the British, you said it yourself. They had no right to "split" anything. Muslims and Jews lived in Palestine pre european occupation just fine. The present day "Middle East" (a colonialist term) is
236.
by za3faran 2y ago
Do not take texts out of context, I'll leave it at that.
237.
by za3faran 2y ago
We know Jews that lived in Syria - their houses are still intact and held for their owners. I already referred to a youtube interview with one you can easily find. He speaks positively of the Syrians. Islam is very well known to protect the
238.
by za3faran 2y ago
It is indeed easy to see the endless stream of videos of people in Gaza who have literally starved to death.
239.
by za3faran 2y ago
Revolt against what? Who was occupying Palestine at the time?
240.
by za3faran 2y ago
The Palestinians did not start war over land - they were occupied and their home land stolen.

More ›