Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
yebyen
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
12 ms
·
61.
▲
by
yebyen
3y ago
I'm having a real hard time with this, not as hard as the people that new her personally I'm sure. But here's why Nova's passing is still so hard for me personally. I grew up having my social life on the internet with st
62.
▲
by
yebyen
3y ago
It isn't usable if your goal is to take the open source project and turn it into a component of your own commercial product that is for sale and is closed-source. But I think more than half of the people in this thread have the opposit
63.
▲
by
yebyen
3y ago
Ah, looks like there are several! And they're all third-(third-)party... > https://headscale.net/web-ui/
64.
▲
by
yebyen
3y ago
Reverse nit, there is a UI for headscale: https://github.com/gurucomputing/headscale-ui Granted, that's also not tailscale.
65.
▲
by
yebyen
3y ago
You might be thinking of the "obviousness test" for patents. If an invention is a combination of two things which are established prior art, and there is a suggestion, teaching, or motivation which any person could discover throug
66.
▲
by
yebyen
3y ago
I think appropriating code against the license would be a license violation. Whether it's a bug or a feature doesn't really make any difference. If it's not licensed for copying, then you can't copy it. You can't re
67.
▲
by
yebyen
3y ago
> maintain the tradition (mistakenly) established by Urbit No, your traditions are a mistake. (How do you like it?)
68.
▲
by
yebyen
3y ago
They literally kicked him out of town. If there was any person you could pick that best represents the whole Urbit community now, it would be anyone but this person. And that's not because I am beefing with him or have any personal bee
69.
▲
by
yebyen
3y ago
You may laugh, but a few years ago all those guys who sold us (some of? us - me anyway) on Kubernetes evidently got bored with it, and now they're all building a Hippo Factory[1]. And it's actually really good. This is the current
70.
▲
by
yebyen
3y ago
https://www.kjmagnetics.com/blog.asp?p=electromagnetic-levit...
71.
▲
by
yebyen
3y ago
I implemented my first real-world project in WASM for OSS Summit, and everything you said about WASI echoes my real-world experience. It's not a set of functions to call. It's a terrific bundle of constraints (enabling constraints
72.
▲
by
yebyen
3y ago
OK, but if it has value (utility) and it has scarcity, then it's going to get a cash price. My favorite internet argument about Web3 was the time that I had two people on Twitter telling me that "scarcity" was a problem with
73.
▲
by
yebyen
3y ago
Well I mean, you don't actually need to pay for it, you only need to "make them cost something." (You know, like a JPEG? Nobody really pays for these, do they?) It's just a bit of friction, think of it like I'm givi
74.
▲
by
yebyen
3y ago
I'm glad you've heard of it! There are lots more authors now. I'm not sure why you're so hung up on this one. (He was literally forced out of town. So don't hold him against us.) I was also pretty sure that story wo
75.
▲
by
yebyen
3y ago
How do you make decentralized identities that are spam-proof? You have to make them cost something, that's how. That's what this argument misses, and why you are all wrong about this IMHO.
76.
▲
by
yebyen
3y ago
I still think Urbit has a chance.
77.
▲
by
yebyen
3y ago
I bet a lot of people already know Technology Connections, but I like to bring up the first video of his that I ever watched at a time like this - that's right, the one about heat pumps! He goes on this rant towards the end about Midwe
78.
▲
by
yebyen
3y ago
That's not an optimization, lol, and it's not an answer. If the 20 minute recharge was built into a break, with a fast charger, that's going to add an extra 120 miles onto the delivery route range. IDK how many miles Amazon r
79.
▲
by
yebyen
3y ago
> Teams that find a way to not do the break wind up winning Teams that don't take the break will be inhibited by the limited range of their un-recharged vehicles. Are you suggesting that some people will find out how to swap their v
80.
▲
by
yebyen
3y ago
As a patient I am so offended by the idea that getting a complete and accurate record of one's own medical history and communications might actually just be a big hinderance that really is only gonna make someone's insurance premi
81.
▲
by
yebyen
3y ago
There's an awful lot of languages with an .fe code file extension, aren't there: https://ferite.sourceforge.net/
82.
▲
by
yebyen
3y ago
Yeah, I was about to ask it "OK, how long should I wait, or do you need me to provide more input?" then I remembered, I'm not talking to a being. There's no reason to ask it questions like that. Keep talking about the pr
83.
▲
by
yebyen
3y ago
> very convincing imitation of being able to do so So that's really what was happening! Then it's even more impressive how close it came to parsing the PDF file correctly, (or I guess I gave it more direct hints than I remember
84.
▲
by
yebyen
3y ago
I was working with GPT the other day on a new (not programming) problem for the first time, and I asked it to download a Google Drive spreadsheet and take a look at it. Which I was quite surprised to get a flat response that it couldn'
85.
▲
by
yebyen
3y ago
LOL you're right, we could have had a civil conversation and productive dialog if I had just included that one word in my first post! My bad.
86.
▲
by
yebyen
3y ago
If you want to go ahead and remove again the specific context of my question/assertion after I re-added them back together, to emphasize how important that context was, go ahead and do it. I said what I said, in the order that I said i
87.
▲
by
yebyen
3y ago
> First of all, you made a general statement and I demonstrated its falsity This is an extremely disingenuous reading of our conversation. I made a specific statement about a particular instance (which you dismissed as cherry-picking), a
88.
▲
by
yebyen
3y ago
I picked the one that was donated on purpose by its creators though, and it's still making profits for the drug companies 100 years later. So why do we need patents, then? From the page you linked: > While these drugs are nearing th
89.
▲
by
yebyen
3y ago
I don't know much about it honestly, but this article that talks about PBMs is very interesting: https://publichealth.jhu.edu/2023/eli-lilly-lowers-insulin-p... > “Even though they're dropping their list p
90.
▲
by
yebyen
3y ago
"Obviously." I like how this is the argument for drug patents, and if you don't just simply agree with this, the only real other option is to accuse the person arguing that it "obviously" is the right decision of ar
More ›