Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
yebyen
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
90 ms
·
781.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
If you're talking about HBO Go, I don't know how you gauge success, but if it's subscriber numbers I would take that with a grain of salt. I am a Comcast subscriber, and like many Comcast subscribers I'm sure, I have one
782.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
Thanks! Pretty sure you can get progressive versions of this type of behavior (where obj["field"] is equivalent to obj[:field] or obj.field) by using Ruby's HashWithIndifferentAccess and/or OpenStruct classes, but those
783.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
What have you got against symbols exactly? I don't know enough about the reasons why they are implemented to argue this strongly, but I know that they are immutable and that they are one step closer to the language in the sense that, c
784.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
> You use the name "gardai" as if it is different from "police" Indeed this is just the Irish word for police, and it is different in only one way that I'm aware of, that the Irish government has long been inextr
785.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
This article is terrible and seems to have been flagged off the front page, but how do you know that it didn't happen exactly like they say? The Reddit thread I linked below had corroborating witnesses showing up to say that is exactly
786.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
Yes. The Reddit thread was really interesting because some Irish commented, and they talked about how the Catholic hospitals and the Gardai (local police) worked together in this scheme. https://www.reddit.com/r/worldn
787.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
Fair enough. Thanks for the education in terms. I'm extrapolating a lot from a small comment, so forgive me if I've misinterpreted your comment, but I have an issue with your reasoning; I don't know what it tells us that 50%
788.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
Is it possible that the fact of receiving a diagnosis is more strongly correlated with the likelihood of getting help than you accounted for? Also, what is "diagnosable" – that sounds suspiciously different than "diagnosed.&
789.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
^ superbly underrated comment here
790.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
"You had an undisclosed agenda this whole time? How could you! I trusted you, anonymous stranger on the internet! This is an injustice that can never be forgiven!!!" Get used to hearing this! Not the parent poster, but I've
791.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
ELI5: do you want to manage EC2 nodes and run containers on them? Use ECS (until you outgrow it. Why not... it is the cheapest of the three.) Do you want to run Kubernetes in production, but afraid to do it yourself? (You probably know a
792.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
You told me you thought I'm not in the minority, and others have come forward to agree. I think we are the long tail. It is exactly as you say, companies that don't want to spend more than they absolutely need to on infrastructur
793.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
I'd speculate that Google did it on purpose the first time (everyone knew there had to be an announcement coming, and the date of re:Invent was well known in advance.) Given what some are saying in this thread here today, I would not b
794.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
Thanks for that!
795.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
You're obviously no slouch, and I respect your opinion, but I think Amazon is all about the long tail and without speculating too much about what they are thinking, I'll say they might disagree. They are obviously smart to go for
796.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
"No experience" is a stretch. I'll concede, no significant Prod experience to speak of. I got introduced to the Kubernetes ecosystem when Deis Workflow was rebuilt for it. Today, I'm a core contributor on the team that
797.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
Not only recently, but actually this was the cost until yesterday for GKE with HA masters distributed across AZs[1]! I only heard that this announcement from AWS was likely coming this morning, over here in the thread about upgrading GKE
798.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
I'm pretty clearly in the minority with my opinion here, and I recognize that. Amazon has made a substantial investment in Kubernetes here and that is nothing to shrug at. They are entitled (and justified) to recoup it. It's fai
799.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
Here's the scoop[1] It sounds like you must have taken some investment to qualify. But I believe my friend received the credit, and I have no idea if his business has received any investments or participates in any accelerator program
800.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
> public renewable energy footprint When electricity is the sole marginal cost of keeping a node powered up from your pool of available machines that can be powered on and off on-demand, these particular words actually mean a lot. I thin
801.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
You can afford ~5 preemptible instances for the cost of one full-time instance. I think you are severely overestimating the harm that is done by preempting/terminating instances in a prod Kubernetes cluster that is capably configured
802.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
Sure, I guess so, it's a value add. Your engineers can't mess anything up if they have no access at all.
803.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
Yeah, none of the rest of the big three are asking you to pay anything for those masters at this point, though. "They're your nodes, you paid for them" seems like a reasonable position to take here.
804.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
Just guessing, I think they were thinking, "We'd better put something out there in GA before Azure/AKS does. We're already late to the party." Maybe they actually don't think of that at all... I'm very s
805.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
That's $150/mo before you even launch a single worker tho. I don't know about you, but I'd personally rather pay the $5 if I don't need a serious cluster yet. How much in actual absolute dollars do you think this i
806.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
The Google GKE offering can operate with a single g1-small worker. That's $0.0257/hr or $0.0070/hr preemptible. $5/mo minimum* This is not even the same ballpark. *(to be fair, the $5/mo minimum does not include a
807.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
> You pay $0.20 per hour for the EKS Control Plane, and usual EC2, EBS, and Load Balancing prices for resources that run in your account Objectively that's not bad for HA masters in separate AZs, but I think for those who have been
808.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
It's on now, announcement is that EKS is generally available, they said so within the first 30 seconds. Anonymous source did not disappoint! Just heard that Control plane is priced at $0.20/hr, yikes... that's not bad for HA
809.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
That's exactly what CI does. It saves me from doing it, and it can do so with concurrent workers (say, if I finish the next thing before the hour is up. Should I be running the two concurrent test suites on my local machine? Or hold
810.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
... link? (edit: thanks!)
More ›