Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
yebyen
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
73 ms
·
811.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
Without CI, what choice would I have? Go find another computer when I think my feature branch is ready to merge? (...stop working for an hour?)
812.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
Build time is not just compile time. My app is Ruby so deployment time is nearly nil, but we have a regression suite that takes inching past an whole hour, that we run before every merge, and consult in detail before prod releases. I hope
813.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
Many of your criticisms may be justified, but this one reads a bit silly to me: > monopoly on the media player and the web browser on the most used OS in the world I know it's a trope to say that IE was a monopoly, but the longest v
814.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
Try a reverse lookup yebyen:~$ host google.com google.com has address 172.217.10.46 google.com has IPv6 address 2607:f8b0:4006:803::200e ... yebyen:~$ host 172.217.10.46 46.10.217.172.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer lga34s13
815.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
Well, maybe not group membership, but certainly there is a 'root' to the tree of permissions and capabilities, and I think it's true that some of them derive from more basic capabilities. If each capability (cross the namespa
816.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
When I learned about the concept of "just barely good enough" I was thrilled by it. Lots of people been using the expression "good enough" and to me it feels like a defeatist idea. "They did their best! It's
817.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
That's correct! And as much as I may gripe about these issues, we're consistently ranked as one of the best places to work in tech. I believe that's specifically with respect to employee happiness. (Go figure! LOL) Just go
818.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
> What is driving the turn-over? Are team-members being moved elsewhere "72%" is really misleading... from the original team of 2 developers and one PM/Scrum-Master, the Scrum-Master was promoted to a newly formed team, an
819.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
> done right it is effective. That is one of the problems highlighted in the article though, too. What is the appropriate level of training for a scrum master and scrum team? Should we read the Scrum Guide? Are we reading the Scrum Gu
820.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
I am definitely using Weave Net for my trivial single-node cluster because it was the only CNI option that included a one-liner to install. I have never had any reason to try a different one, the pods can talk to each other, "does what
821.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
Whoever downvotes you probably never tried Bluemix. Just saying. (I used it once at a hackathon several years ago and it was enough to make me want to not try again. I hope their current offerings are better. At the time, they had some u
822.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
I found this post (gp) extremely refreshing actually! For context, I have participated in my fair share of Red Hat betas, and I have found the experience to be mostly uniform. That is, the product is labeled as beta because it has many (so
823.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
To an extent though, it is! All of those vendors (some more than others) are pretty serious about Kubernetes, and they're a tiny fraction of the list[1]. I keep hearing that AWS Lambda has won serverless (Functions as a Service), but
824.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
Crap you're right, I don't know why GitHub would present a link and the content is missing... I'm sure I have a copy but this should be the source. I'm actually on the Shoes maintainer list, so if nobody knows why, I kn
825.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
> just as performant as any JVM based application can be? I know this is not meant to be a leading statement or a subtle dig, but it's left open enough for interpretation that I think it's probably why you got downvoted. If you
826.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
Yes http://shoesrb.com/manual/Shoes.html Nobody Knows Shoes link, follow the redirect, then second link from the bottom https://github.com/downloads/shoes/shoes-deprecated/nks.pdf
827.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
The programming manual with a soundtrack! And an onion somehow packaged neatly inside. https://poignant.guide > Pretend that you’ve opened this book (although you probably have opened this book), just to find a huge onion rig
828.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
Have you read "Nobody Knows Shoes" ? I consider this the canonical source on how Shoes is supposed to work and what it should look like. It's supposed to look like writing HTML, if your HTML writing was done in a builder syn
829.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
Well, there's Shoes.app which you can use to bundle your application into a vendor package, but there's not really any facility for obfuscating Ruby into executable static objects that I am aware of, neither why you would want it.
830.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
(Spoiler alert: you got me, InfoSec typically does love this stuff. If it was just up to InfoSec, these types of things would be approved because they are so well organized and easy to understand. The alternative being, to deal with anoth
831.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
> only because it does so much > can you point to alternatives which are simpler Sure, there are plenty of simpler alternatives... as long as you're willing to consider ones that don't do quite as much. (Beware, you'll
832.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
The portability is not as attractive as a fully integrated solution though, for types of people that are not already attracted to Kubernetes. Where I work, we use AWS and say that "we love vendor lock-in." The more integration w
833.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
I would love to hear more of this kind of talk. I'd really like to get you in the room with a couple of architects and technology leadership in my office. (No seriously, maybe zoom room.) I'm on the kubernetes train, but they are
834.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
Hey, I just watched the Riff video and I'm a little blown away! Can't believe you've been downvoted
835.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
OK, I'll do it, although this one requires that you have a live Kubernetes cluster to run your functions on, I haven't heard much about it other than that it is more friendly open code from the lovely people that brought us Deis a
836.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
So this is an interesting topic for me, because I once tried to write a "conversational" Hubot plugin for a hackathon[1] To me, "conversational" means the bot must inform its responses from the context of previous messag
837.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
There was a great keynote about this at this year's RailsConf The argument was essentially that if Twitter had instead chosen a language that was more natively inclined toward scalability, they would have necessarily hired 10x as many
838.
▲
by
yebyen
9y ago
> > You won't be paying for those masters anymore with the managed offering, from any of the cloud vendors I've heard of announcing a managed offering. > Interesting, I didn't know about that. Not sure if I prefer th
839.
▲
by
yebyen
9y ago
That's very interesting, thanks for sharing. $50/mo is a bit for a hobbyist, but not much if you're operating at any serious kind of scale! But I mean, in addition to the StackPoint subscription, you do also pay for the mast
840.
▲
by
yebyen
9y ago
You're paying for master nodes with StackPoint, right? Each droplet you start has the same cost structure whether it's running your "user-land" slave workloads or if it's there just for running your cluster. The bi
More ›