wwtrv

9 ms·

61.
by wwtrv 3y ago
> You're about a year or so late with this "prediction." Of course other much better informed people have said it before. Show what? What happens if they try manufacturing it at scale and every third car needs to be sent b
62.
by wwtrv 3y ago
> I have yet to hear of a single customer or partner leave the service Which doesen't mean a lot. Of course they'd wait for this to play out before committing to anything. > but if new management can keep the gravy track I
63.
by wwtrv 3y ago
> is a sign of weakness It's often a sign of incompetence though. Or rather a confirmation of it.
64.
by wwtrv 3y ago
He presumably can attract investors?
65.
by wwtrv 3y ago
Would those talented engineers or scientists be content with significantly lower compensation and generally significantly less resources to work with. However good their intentions might this probably won't make them too attractive to
66.
by wwtrv 3y ago
> Apple's so-called 'ethics' in China whilst they're profiting and benefiting from forced labor Just like almost every single other company which is making consumer electronics? And I don't think the conditions i
67.
by wwtrv 3y ago
> they keep postponing the CyberTruck > CyberTruck also won't be in mass production I'm not sure being an EV is the biggest hurdle for manufacturing that abomination. Tesla had troubles putting plastic panels together, so st
68.
by wwtrv 3y ago
> to provide assurances to those national governments that their own state can’t be dictated to by other states within the EU who may hold different cultural values. You might be thinking about the council and not the commission? While c
69.
by wwtrv 3y ago
Yet the overwhelming majority of people in the Netherlands still uses cars as their primary method of transport: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php... of course if you moved there from th
70.
by wwtrv 3y ago
It increases the cost of living in those areas, so what they are saying makes sense just because of that.
71.
by wwtrv 3y ago
> It's totally OK to live in Stockholm, as well as in many other cities in Europe And/or having a car is too expensive for some so people make do..
72.
by wwtrv 3y ago
> That's 24 well-paid developers, or double that from lower-income countries. That's a stretch even if we don't count the additional overhead.
73.
by wwtrv 3y ago
> Why dont they use same principle license as Unreal? Their largest customers will probably push back against that more than the install fees. You're losing most of you revenue from China (and some other countries). Companies there
74.
by wwtrv 3y ago
> $0.27 The highest possible fee seems to the $0.20 (only if 100% of your users are in the US and a few other rich countries). Also it only seems to the there to encourage everyone on Personal/Plus to upgrade to Pro (before these c
75.
by wwtrv 3y ago
> Unreal-style revshare where you just give them a small % is super reasonable in comparison The per install fee is still going to be significantly lower for everyone making > $2 per user than what Unreal charges. And I assume Unity&#
76.
by wwtrv 3y ago
Exactly. It's really fascinating that people view this as an ideological/religious thing. It might even seem that some treat RISC-V as some sort of a cult? > CISC dogmatism Besides the fact that your understanding of what CISC
77.
by wwtrv 3y ago
> You are incorrect. > Debate won't prove it, I find this (almost) religious style fanaticism about something as mundane as an instruction set quite fascinating.
78.
by wwtrv 3y ago
Age, nationality, religion, marital status etc. all fall into the same category and I haven't really heard anything about religious hiring quotas. So it's still a significant leap and I'm still not sure how would this affect
79.
by wwtrv 3y ago
> I can't see any reason why the exact Wouldn't they need to implement a bunch of additional extensions which RISC-V doesen't currently have just to reach feature parity? That alone would've introduced significant del
80.
by wwtrv 3y ago
> more complex and thus they actually I could make a similarly unsubstantiated claim that their chips are much faster than RISC-V ones because of that (of course they are unambiguously faster it's just that this is not the only reas
81.
by wwtrv 3y ago
Will they throw the book at you or at the company?
82.
by wwtrv 3y ago
Ok, I'm absolutely sure that hate speech is protected under the first amendment. > White supremacy is nothing but a threat That's not what the supreme court seems to think.
83.
by wwtrv 3y ago
> 2023-2024 for the cores. If your benchmark is x86 from ~2016-2018 then maybe. But the competition is moving forward as well (and Intel, AMD and ARM have a lot more money to invest into R&D)
84.
by wwtrv 3y ago
So are you advocating banning people from having too many friends? Owning summer houses? I'm just trying to understood how do you think that could work (besides from abolishing capitalism). This is only partially sarcasm, I do certain
85.
by wwtrv 3y ago
That's not a direct analogue to the Hindu caste system because at most generation or two were perfectly sufficient to transition to a higher level 'caste'.
86.
by wwtrv 3y ago
It's not a caste in the direct sense. I mean rich people who adopted their cultural practices or married into (which would be hardly even possible in a 'true' caste system) were generally socially accepted. Of course being Ir
87.
by wwtrv 3y ago
What does banning caste based discrimination with affirmative action?
88.
by wwtrv 3y ago
I'm pretty sure it is protected under the first amendment, especially as long as you don't actively advocate direct violence etc.
89.
by wwtrv 3y ago
Could you try to explain how? Do you generally oppose all race/gender/etc. based anti discrimination laws?
90.
by wwtrv 3y ago
China would much prefer taking over Taiwan peacefully, constant threat of invasion while increasing trade ties between both countries make it more likely. As long as China is a credible threat Taiwan will never declare independence. That do

More ›