Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
worrycue
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
31 ms
·
421.
▲
by
worrycue
4y ago
Should have run the source code of the open source library through ChatGPT to look for bugs. /s
422.
▲
by
worrycue
4y ago
It needs to be able to evaluate its own output. We human do a quick sanity check most of the time before we speak - “On what do I base this assertion?” … etc.
423.
▲
by
worrycue
4y ago
> I have somewhat stopped figuring how to do things like read from a file, serialize data, etc. Shouldn’t that stuff be in a library or API call with examples a quick google search away?
424.
▲
by
worrycue
4y ago
If your country views the US as a hostile foreign power, yes, banning Facebook is a reasonable course of action.
425.
▲
by
worrycue
4y ago
IMHO the real target is the enterprise market - and no one really cares about the gaming market anymore; look at Nvidia and AMD, both pretty much gave the middle finger to gamers with their high prices. The cynic in me feel that Intel is ta
426.
▲
by
worrycue
4y ago
Not from what I have seen. GN is pretty encouraging and frequently reports on Arc driver improvements.
427.
▲
by
worrycue
4y ago
There is no point asking for evidence, they aren’t “convicting” based on evidence. They are instead taking preliminary precautions based on the fact that the technology can be abused and that it’s controlled by a hostile foreign power.
428.
▲
by
worrycue
4y ago
I think many don’t want to wait and find out. The fact that it could be abused and it’s controlled by a hostile foreign power is seen as reason enough to ban it.
429.
▲
by
worrycue
4y ago
Probably better to have your “diverse points of view embodied in the ideal of free speech” on a platform that isn’t controlled by a hostile foreign power. I can totally see their algorithm being used to push videos with views that they want
430.
▲
by
worrycue
4y ago
Not everyone requires “just right” though. There are no wrong answers in art. Although in this case, it’s an adobe product, the only people who will use it are artists.
431.
▲
by
worrycue
4y ago
What if you need to generate a picture of Hello Kitty for an article someone is writing about the art style of Hello Kitty or something? I.E. Fair Use cases.
432.
▲
by
worrycue
4y ago
He is comparing it to a calculator and CHatGPT doesn’t measure up in some aspects. The good things about reliable tools is you can offload the cognitive burden onto them and know they won’t screw you over. Almost every single post here abou
433.
▲
by
worrycue
4y ago
> According to my artist friends, commissions are down, and there's reports of professional positions being replaced as well. To be fair, the economy is in a dump. Reduced commissions and positions being cut might have more to do wi
434.
▲
by
worrycue
4y ago
Who know what kind of people visit this site? (Apart from having an interest in technology - particularly IT.)
435.
▲
by
worrycue
4y ago
> Eventually, almost everyone figures out for themselves what makes them happy and what doesn't. The approach my parents took to my upbringing - or lack thereof. Today at 42, I feel I have wasted most of my life and have achieved no
436.
▲
by
worrycue
4y ago
> bulk licensing through agencies And the agencies pay the artists, yes? Now you can just get art from MidJourney and skip the artists.
437.
▲
by
worrycue
4y ago
China’s exports I heard are down and shipping containers are actually piling up at their ports. I feel artists selling “generic art” for pictures in lobbies and homes are probably going to be out of a job.
438.
▲
by
worrycue
4y ago
There is already a state bailout. CS got loaned $54B. UBS got guaranteed another $100B loan for buying CS - and I read from another post ( https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35222147 ) the state will cover up to $9B in loss
439.
▲
by
worrycue
4y ago
I heard shipping containers have been piling up at China’s ports and China exports are way down - with quite a few factory suspending operations. Supposedly the US stopped buying because inflation means people focus on the necessities like
440.
▲
by
worrycue
4y ago
Man, this was more serious than I thought. They rushed to get the whole thing done during the weekend and pushed it through bypassing all the shareholders. This year is getting worse by the minute. Insane inflation killing many industries.
441.
▲
by
worrycue
4y ago
I feel when we have truly intelligent machines, programming jobs will be gone. But AI’s like ChatGPT aren’t there yet. It’s just good at faking it - until it isn’t and fails silently. Maybe it’s the lack of data - it’s difficult to model th
442.
▲
by
worrycue
4y ago
> people are so thirsty for a 10% improvement for natural images at qualities above what most websites serve Because it won’t be just the web that uses JPEG. However whoever wins the support of the web will become THE universal image for
443.
▲
by
worrycue
4y ago
I feel most won’t risk it. It’s less embarrassing to say you don’t know than to be wrong.
444.
▲
by
worrycue
4y ago
They did give their workers cancer and denied it for 10 years. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/samsung-electronics-apology-sic...
445.
▲
by
worrycue
4y ago
Your professors generally don’t make stuff up if they don’t know something. Your professors are also more likely to catch on if something doesn’t make sense - unlike ChatGPT which can’t seem to reason effectively because most of the time it
446.
▲
by
worrycue
4y ago
I feel google didn’t release anything because they don’t want a reputation for being inaccurate. Look at what happened when their Bard AI screwed up one fact. Their stock lost 100 million in value.
447.
▲
by
worrycue
4y ago
Given its propensity to hallucinate, I don’t think anyone is going to let it write anything unsupervised.
448.
▲
by
worrycue
4y ago
I’m not actually sure it’s better than google search even. Google will tell you if it can’t find something while ChatGPT will happily make up complete BS to confidently tell you.
449.
▲
by
worrycue
4y ago
> No one is really choosing the specific way the features are manifested in the final AI product. For current algorithms, yes. If an algorithm has problematic tendencies we can just choose not to use it - or use it in a very controlled a
450.
▲
by
worrycue
4y ago
> claim that they don't understand anything at all? They certainly don't understand enough to get things right without a few thousand examples already demonstrating the solution to a specific problem.
More ›