worrycue

36 ms·

451.
by worrycue 4y ago
I just want its capabilities to be accurately advertised. A lot of people are assigning it capabilities it doesn't really have.
452.
by worrycue 4y ago
> According to your logic that's proof that humans don't understand anything. Well, it's reasonable to conclude that the people who constantly making "stupid mistakes, assumptions, and biases leaps in logic" don&
453.
by worrycue 4y ago
Arguing with AI (especially LLM) proponents is beginning to feel like arguing with a religious person ... it's almost easier to just let them believe in their god. Pointing out the failures of their favorite LLM to prove to them that i
454.
by worrycue 4y ago
> create new data in it through approximations and heuristics defined in the algorithm I guess the difference is where the algorithm gets it's input data from. Just sensor data or does it draw from a neural network that memorized a
455.
by worrycue 4y ago
IMHO it’s both. Although the risky investing probably played a bigger part.
456.
by worrycue 4y ago
There needs to be some kind of penalty for the C-suites for running a bank with no risk manager for 9 months too. They had no interest rate risk hedges the entire time. Edit: Downvotes with no replies. I hate it when that happens.
457.
by worrycue 4y ago
Adds another thing that can go wrong though. It doesn't cite its sources either, does it? I have seen people ask it to explain but it's explanation can be wrong too ...
458.
by worrycue 4y ago
I guess if you use it like Google for small nuggets of information you can easily fact check, it's fine. Although might as well just use Google directly which will send you either to Stack Overflow or Reddit where there are comments di
459.
by worrycue 4y ago
Still learning Haskell, don't quite get what you are saying. But I will probably figure it out someday.
460.
by worrycue 4y ago
Can you trust it though? It can’t really reason - it’s just very good at guessing the right answer if there are a lot of examples. It also lies somewhat frequently. If we have to double check its output, it kind of defeats the purpose - at
461.
by worrycue 4y ago
If people don’t make art for money there wouldn’t be such a huge blowback from AI art.
462.
by worrycue 4y ago
Frankly, if ChatGPT is only good at reproducing commonly written code, I don’t think it will impact the profession much given that code reuse is already a thing and lots are distributed free on the internet.
463.
by worrycue 4y ago
I feel the question is, should we be making this worse with unreliable AI. Currently AI seem to have 2 weaknesses, it’s quite bad at reasoning and it hallucinates. Yes, humans screw up reasoning too but at least they try. AI like ChatGPT se
464.
by worrycue 4y ago
There is being misinformed and making a mistake when reasoning. Then there is making s** up. Most humans have the decency to not do the latter while AI (at the moment) freely makes up complete lies when it doesn't have the answer inste
465.
by worrycue 4y ago
> Firstly, the unreliability may not be permanent, and we may improve the AI accuracy in the future. How about we fix the unreliability first and not put the cart before the horse. > The elitist mindset needs to die, let's give a
466.
by worrycue 4y ago
Am I the only one somewhat alarmed that we are choosing to rely on AIs that are vulnerable to hallucinations so much? Personally I rather have a more limited but reliable tool than a more powerful but unreliable one.
467.
by worrycue 4y ago
Humans can self correct / think critically. AIs like ChatGPT can’t do that at all. You know sometimes you have a “bright idea” then after thinking about it for a second you realise it’s nonsense. With AI like ChatGPT, the “thinking abo
468.
by worrycue 4y ago
Maybe I’m just old but I don’t quite understand the hype. As long as it’s vulnerable to hallucinating, it can’t be used for anything where there are “wrong answers” - and I don’t think ChatGPT-4 has fixed that issue yet.* Now if it’s one of
469.
by worrycue 4y ago
> Russia's problem is the total stupidity of the ruling guys More likely the result of the resource curse. https://youtu.be/rStL7niR7gs
470.
by worrycue 4y ago
> this has not caused mass social harm despite the tens of millions of users Isn’t it a bit early to tell? I can foresee ChatGPT being used to farm “karma” on social media sites to bot accounts to credibility on sites like Reddit - maybe
471.
by worrycue 4y ago
I figured if the interest rate went up slower they could have survived the lower losses.
472.
by worrycue 4y ago
You know, I suspect part of the problem is the lack of diversity in SVB's depositor base. When the tech sector took a hit, a significant chunk of SVB's depositors started to redraw money, combined that with their reduced liquidity
473.
by worrycue 4y ago
Your sort of loss in confidence don't lead to further bank runs and complete collapse of the financial system so I think it's a loss they are willing to suffer. > perpetuating the behavior that caused the failure. A detail post
474.
by worrycue 4y ago
Regardless whether you think it's "fair" or not. Letting depositors lose their money won't prevent another SVB.
475.
by worrycue 4y ago
Just because they have a lot of money doesn’t mean they have the expertise to evaluate a bank’s inner workings. Although I guess they could have hired people at considerable expense to do that … and I think some of them did which was what e
476.
by worrycue 4y ago
So how would letting depositors get wiped out stop these executives and shareholders from repeating SVB? Better to just ban such executives from the banking industry and set up better monitoring of banks to catch those that are trying to pu
477.
by worrycue 4y ago
To be frank, letting depositors get wiped out will not stop those executives from doing the same thing. Most depositors won’t look too closely at what their banks do - heck most don’t understand how banks work. Simpler to just create laws a
478.
by worrycue 4y ago
> then you probably end up with CD quality since they basically sample the physical structure of the album. Not quite. Vinyl if I'm right physically represents the audio wave forms - and there might be limits to how accurately it ca
479.
by worrycue 4y ago
Vinyls have one other weakness though, wear and tear. The more you play it the worse the sound quality gets.
480.
by worrycue 4y ago
> even today, a discerning viewer can still tell CGI apart from live action You can tell BAD CGI apart from live action. https://youtu.be/bL6hp8BKB24

More ›