wav-part

17 ms·

121.
by wav-part 10y ago
Completely agree with him. FG alone is for-women but FG in front of CB is against-men . CB alone is strength but CB in front of FG is against-women . Separtely both are great work of art even after considering source of funds. But the
122.
by wav-part 10y ago
Is "for the purpose" predefined ? If not, we have only ourselves to blame for including such subjective terms in such serious matters.
123.
by wav-part 10y ago
Yes except it wont be the website server returning chain of trust but nameserver.
124.
by wav-part 10y ago
> it's a tree-structured PKI, just like the CA system, except that the top of the tree is run de jure by world governments. Which can be solved by having bit.ly key validated by .ly key + Firefox key + LetsEncrypt key. DNSSEC may
125.
by wav-part 10y ago
Just migrate to DNSSEC/DANE already. CAs have no incentive to mis-issue certs. CAs whole business model is selling trust. Its obvious TLDs (.com/etc) are the one who should validate/issue certs. Regarding TLDs coming under co
126.
by wav-part 10y ago
I was more thinking about non-profit's own payment network over cc & others. Fraud can be solved by making each irreversible txn ratable. Each seller can choose to make sum of all ratings and txn over some period public to appear m
127.
by wav-part 10y ago
True. My point was that profit motivation of banks should not be an issue.
128.
by wav-part 10y ago
It would have been true if there were not so many networks (SWIFT, VISA, MasterCard, Paypal, Braintree, Google Wallet, Apple Pay, ...). Judging by the increasing number of networks It can only be concluded that its not so hard. Only non pro
129.
by wav-part 10y ago
Payment Processing/Network is the most innovation-less thing IMO. But still there is not a non-profit leader. Why ?
130.
Final Report on the Investigation of the Macondo Well Blowout (2011) [pdf](ccrm.berkeley.edu)
2 points by wav-part 10y ago|0 comments
131.
by wav-part 10y ago
Manipulation != Coercion. Yes both are problems but libertarianism claims to solve only one of those. For the other one, if you are unable, follow/place-your-trust-on someone else. There is no need to solve one problem by creating bigg
132.
by wav-part 10y ago
No. Notice the word "voluntary". From libertarian point of view, Socialism is ok if you voluntary opt-in. Voluntary/Consent is central point in libertarianism.
133.
by wav-part 10y ago
Is not net-neutrality better handled by IANA ? If you are going to call your router "internet", you must treat all IP packets equally. Seems like reasonable terms to me. Afterall this is the property that made Internet what it is
134.
Decipher the (Indian 2016) Demonetisation(decipherdemon.blogspot.com)
2 points by wav-part 10y ago|0 comments
135.
by wav-part 10y ago
A very detailed survey regarding the demonetisation though slightly judgemental. https://decipherdemon.blogspot.in/2016/12/a-monumental-disat...
136.
by wav-part 10y ago
What troubles me more is, How did they come to ban-notes as conclusion considering the economy is mostly underground/decentrealized (ie they dont/cant have the data). (Observation) India is highly decentralized/resilient. In
137.
by wav-part 10y ago
http://www.ndtv.com/india-news/who-knew-pm-narendra-modis-bl... > Prime Minister Narendra Modi handpicked a trusted bureaucrat, little known outside India's financial circles, to spearhead a radical move to ab
138.
by wav-part 10y ago
> In general libertarian thought, the government enforces contracts between private parties. > Okay... So tomorrow, USG offers you an explicit contract by which remaining on its property (eg inside its borders), you agree to follow
139.
by wav-part 10y ago
> There can also be a perfect LG that simply enforces the contract you signed with USG, Thats not possible. LG would only enforce its own very minimal, objective & limited constitution. As a corporation within LG, USG would have to
140.
by wav-part 10y ago
> I assume you really mean non-aggressive Yes. > Except we've moved the boundaries such that USG is non-aggressive (domestically, at least) - you've merely assented to a contract that says you will not use drugs, or USG w
141.
by wav-part 10y ago
> Would you feel better by just viewing USG as a corporation with a contract that you continue to consent to by not having left? Yes I agree. So lets assume we have someone who has monopoly on land (like USG) and who is non-violent (un
142.
by wav-part 10y ago
No. It means small compititors band together to compete against the market leader.
143.
by wav-part 10y ago
> (as there is no difference between a totalitarian government from an all-owning all-contracting corporation), even though they're easily tricked into condoning them. Law works because everyone concent and choose to follow it. If y
144.
by wav-part 10y ago
> Yeah, sorry, Libertarianism is more like a religion than a system of governance. Though I support Libertarianism, my post was not about it. I am saying, 10 small socialist nations > 1 big socialist nation. 10 small Apple > 1 bi
145.
by wav-part 10y ago
And like other comments have suggested. You cant sue for following the laws. If EC/EU does not like laws then change the laws. If EU does not like Ireland laws then kick Ireland out. But holding 13B euros hostage cannot be tolerated.
146.
by wav-part 10y ago
If you want my money you have to tell me what I am getting otherwise its just extortion. You could argue that state sell market access (which is perfectly ok) then yes its ok for states to compete. > they pay taxes because we all have t
147.
by wav-part 10y ago
Replace Tax Heavens --> Compitition states --> corporations corporations --> customers Do you see any problem ?
148.
by wav-part 10y ago
This sounds like dispute between Ireland and EU. Please remind me why is Apple dragged into this ? Specifically laws. There is also the concern of how 13B Euros of Apple will-be/have-been seized/escrowed for the duration of the ca
149.
by wav-part 10y ago
IMHO, Taxes (or market access/safety-of-life etc) are absurdely overpriced. We are seeing market-competition. And I for one welcome it, like any other competition. I dont know whats "fair" and I dont care. I want things as ch
150.
by wav-part 10y ago
> Though Apple will have to pay its tax bill within weeks, the money will be held in escrow, and the issue will probably take years to be resolved. Am I the only one outraged by this ? There is no guarntee your money is safe. You hire

More ›