10 ms·
Completely agree with him. FG alone is for-women but FG in front of CB is against-men. CB alone is strength but CB in front of FG is against-women. Separtely b
by wav-part 10y ago
Completely agree with him. FG alone is for-women but FG in front of CB is against-men. CB alone is strength but CB in front of FG is against-women.
Separtely both are great work of art even after considering source of funds. But they managed to ruin both of them.
- icebraining 10y agoWhy men? The bull was never supposed to represent men.
- akvadrako 10y agoMaybe not precisely and only "every male human", but what is a bull if not masculinity?
- lacampbell 10y agoDid you read the article? It represents a bull market. It was put there in the wake of the 1987 crash.
- Symmetry 10y agoIt was created to represent the bull market and, alone, that's its obvious reading. But now that it's faced off against the fearless girl obvious reading is as a masculine, destructive force. We can try to invest the symbols we create with meaning but in the end the meanings they end up having to people is largely based on things out of our control.
- cormacrelf 10y agoThat's essentially what OP said in their 3rd sentence. FG being there changes what the bull represents.
- icebraining 10y agoIt does, but why would it change to represent men?
- wav-part 10y agoBecause FG is emphasised as girl not a kid. Gender is important. Opposite of girl is powerful men. Opposite of kid would be just powerful.
- Const-me 10y agoNot sure about that: http://images.fineartamerica.com/images/artworkimages/mediumlarge/1/nyc-bull-2007-ronald-hayes.jpg http://images.fineartamerica.com/images/artworkimages/medium...