Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
wav-part
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
21 ms
·
151.
▲
by
wav-part
10y ago
This has much simpler solution: user tagging. I think Reddit Enhancement Suite has it. I am working on a C Reddit/HN client (basically RES on steroids) that would implement these user remebering features such as usertags, usersets, bad
152.
▲
by
wav-part
10y ago
I would guess: Every non-appointed visit is successful.
153.
▲
by
wav-part
10y ago
I get what you are saying. 1. Time should decrease to indicate the importance of it. 2. One should sync with attention span rather than something arbitrary like hour. The idea is that, the number should not be so large (like min) that it
154.
▲
by
wav-part
10y ago
Hence Private Arbitration/Investor-state dispute settlement.
155.
▲
by
wav-part
10y ago
> particularly in criminal law there a wide variety of punishments to "make an example" to deter others from similar conduct, with little effort to make the punishments uniform. Its uncertainity intended by law itself. All ab
156.
▲
by
wav-part
10y ago
Which leads to loss of trust in Court System. Uncertainity in judgement is something to minimize.
157.
▲
by
wav-part
10y ago
You used fair . Replace unethical with fair my point still stands. Fair/Unethical has no bearing on contract after its signed.
158.
▲
by
wav-part
10y ago
How/Where?
159.
▲
by
wav-part
10y ago
You say unethical, I say its not. What happens now ? Do we fight ? The exactness/objectiveness of law/contract is their for a reason.
160.
▲
by
wav-part
10y ago
No, its the Court Systems perogative to pick which contract to enforce. You can outlaw a contract based on feels/facts but the enforcement of valid contract must remain objective.
161.
▲
by
wav-part
10y ago
For the love of common sense, law does not function on feel . Contracts are objective. What you describe would change the meaning of contract according to feel of a party or even 3rd parties.
162.
▲
by
wav-part
10y ago
No its lot less worse than UBI. I should point out that the Govt part would be minimal. Food & Shelter should be provided by multiple private entities under contract from Govt. If you want to eliminate Food & Shelter Welfare as well
163.
▲
by
wav-part
10y ago
> Those people are already being supported with fantastically expensive bureaucratic benefit systems. You are basically saying: We already have bad socialism so lets try good socialism . UBI is as bad if not worst. Distorted market wi
164.
▲
by
wav-part
10y ago
You absolutely hit on all points. Great Firewall of China sound sane in comparision.
165.
▲
by
wav-part
10y ago
> That's an easy example that surely no-one is going to seriously argue against, This is ineffective legal solution to social problem. Internet lies. Be cautious when placing trust especially on Internet. Two very good advice peop
166.
▲
by
wav-part
10y ago
> Is this type of thing really personal information, though? Its not. So the rule still works.
167.
▲
by
wav-part
10y ago
Giving every HN user power to delete all his comments will make HN unreadable. To understand a comment, access to all ancestor comments is needed.
168.
▲
by
wav-part
10y ago
I think main concern against RTBF that its not well defined. It cannot cover every info associated with a person. Right to Privacy is more applicable and solves everything you want.
169.
▲
by
wav-part
10y ago
> ... any account you open, you should be able to close and have all relevant information erased, unless there is some special requirement otherwise. > This is law in some places and it's not entirely unreasonable. Its absolu
170.
▲
by
wav-part
10y ago
> ... a lot the tools that artificially help everyone to find information they never knew in the first place. If the information is already legally public, there is no case. If its illegally obtained then there already exist laws that
171.
▲
by
wav-part
10y ago
But what about my Right to Remember ? This is the world we now live in. We have to get used to it. Its a disadvantage but a disadvantage faced by everyone.
172.
▲
by
wav-part
10y ago
How about any personal information illegally obtained (the act already a crime most likely) be defined illegal unless already available legally. However there is still a question of, If a content be blocked globally if its illegal in some c
173.
▲
by
wav-part
10y ago
Oh I thought it would be about Scratchpad Memory [1] which is the future :). [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scratchpad_memory
174.
▲
by
wav-part
10y ago
> what is/is not a political story. How about everything in the form of: We should XYZ . There should be designted place for these type of discussions. So we can 1. Avoid repetitiveness. 2. See others response. 3. Reach conclusio
175.
▲
by
wav-part
10y ago
Wow this will give even non-libertarians a pause.
176.
▲
by
wav-part
10y ago
Oh please. Corporations are blameless here. Its in Govt nature to try to control every part of life and most of the time, succeed.
177.
▲
by
wav-part
10y ago
Democracy is socially-accepted extortion from successful. So any proposed Democracy 2.0 that reduce welfare spending, will be met with opposition from people . This predicts quite many behaviours of people that supposedely support Freedom&
178.
▲
by
wav-part
10y ago
A voter can choose to vote same as somone who he trust and judged to be knowledgable.
179.
▲
by
wav-part
10y ago
I will learn about your stupid riddles when its perfectly clear to me what you are doing. You are stealing from me. If I buy I loaf of a bread I am more than happy to pay for it but dont think I am ok with you extorting percentage of my inc
180.
▲
by
wav-part
10y ago
Then give me exact amount I owe ? Why does it have anything to do with my Income ? Do you pay 5% for your iPhone ? Why is police protection any different ? Why am I not allowed to opt-out of it ? Admit it. Its socially-excepted extortion fr
More ›