vrighter

50 ms·

781.
by vrighter 1y ago
not that familiar with java, but in .net when you do this, it is very common for the implementation to be in a separate assembly, part of a different project
782.
by vrighter 1y ago
if it doesn't matter then why is them not being in an archive along with a bunch of other duplicate stuff a bad thing?
783.
by vrighter 1y ago
You don't have QT libraries installed on your system. You just have then in some archive somewhere along with a bunch of copies of stuff you do already have installed on your system.
784.
by vrighter 1y ago
If the apps inside need to be specifically coded for it, then why is it "marketed" as a way to sandbox currently existing apps?
785.
by vrighter 1y ago
I think flatpaks are all about bringing android's limitations to mainstream linux.
786.
by vrighter 1y ago
The higher up have such a hardon for Microsoft, I think it could actually be used as a bridge across the Atlantic ocean. We've already spent years migrating shit off of microsoft platforms onto the newest and latest microsoft platforms
787.
by vrighter 1y ago
i know what happens in there. Shit that I install because I want to goes in there. And my keepassxc password is protected by a strong password and a hardware token. They are specifically designed so you can safely store them anywhere (ex
788.
by vrighter 1y ago
You let someone "disrupt" the transportation industry, they end up inventing trains all over again. Same shit, different day. These kinds of people fail to think about why something was done the way it was before deciding that t
789.
by vrighter 1y ago
No, I don't. Because it doesn't need to. But not running as root already provides all the protection I want. System files are not my data. My data lives in my home. I want my apps to have access to my stuff, not the whole system
790.
by vrighter 1y ago
oh, how I wish you were right... I had to look deep inside some microsoft software, and I think it actually shortened my lifespan
791.
by vrighter 1y ago
I do not want stronger sandboxing for my apps. I'll only allow it to run on my machine if I trust it anyway. I'm not worried about my apps being able to read my data. If a piece of software doesn't do what I want safely
792.
by vrighter 1y ago
If someone responds with "no" to that question even once, then yes, I don't consider them trustworthy for anything involving complex thought.
793.
by vrighter 1y ago
"This thing has just released" "It would have to be finished/completed" Do you honestly not see a problem with those two statements in such close proximity? Is it finished or is it released? The former is supposed t
794.
by vrighter 1y ago
I started coding at a young age, but entered the professional world in 2012, just like you. I feel the same. I just can't come to grips with the fact that the goal is not to write good software anymore, but to get something, anything
795.
by vrighter 1y ago
If I have to spend all that time planning on how to phrase my stuff to the chatbot, then I might as well think about the code I'm about to write and write it myself. That way I don't have to keep reviewing code I didn't write
796.
by vrighter 1y ago
If there is a single objective right answer, the model should output a probability of 1 for it, and 0 for everything else. Ex. If I ask "Is a sphere a curved object?" The one and only answer is "100% yes" not "I am
797.
by vrighter 1y ago
"vibe" and "professional" don't go in the same sentence.
798.
by vrighter 1y ago
You can't expect to learn to be a painter by simply buying pictures of artwork. You need to try (and fail, over and over) to actually paint.
799.
by vrighter 1y ago
I used to work specifically on backup software. "Hasn't caused any problems so far" is not good enough.
800.
by vrighter 1y ago
no offense, but I would have to be a complete idiot to trust a vibe coded backup application.
801.
by vrighter 1y ago
open core just means that the devs will intentionally hamper the open version and actively refuse pull requests for features that they plan on implementing in their paid version. Stay far away from open core
802.
by vrighter 1y ago
that's the undefined keyword in zig. I love it. It makes UB opt-in and explicit
803.
by vrighter 1y ago
and if you use luajit ffi, those calls actually get called just as fast as from a c program
804.
by vrighter 1y ago
depends on whether the fact that software can be finished will ever be accepted. If you're constantly redeveloping the same thing to "optimize and streamline my experience" (please don't) then yes, the advantage is dubio
805.
by vrighter 1y ago
Don't forget the law of large numters. 5% performance hit on one system is one thing, 5% across almost all of the current computing landscape is still a pretty huge value.
806.
by vrighter 1y ago
you cannot really roll back a bug in a black box system you don't understand
807.
by vrighter 1y ago
you created a custom processor and made a compiler for it. The source language happens to be python, but the generated bytecode is not what executes eon the cpu. A custom ISA is not the python bytecode
808.
by vrighter 2y ago
if you have the knowledge to detect your own hallucinations, then you have the knowledge to not hallucinate in the first place. the fact that we keep seeing "hallucination detectors" means the system is hopelessly broken. And prod
809.
by vrighter 2y ago
use electricity to make hydrogen to fieed the car, vs just use thne electricity you were going to use anyway to directly charge the car. Less losses.
810.
by vrighter 2y ago
but in a way that's easily ignorable, for convenience.

More ›