vrighter

41 ms·

811.
by vrighter 2y ago
ansible is already written in python. Just eliminate the json/yaml and let us use it from python directly.
812.
by vrighter 2y ago
because you end up spending a non-trivial amount of time with "soc analysts" bugging you about a bluetooth vulnerability on an os installed on a virtual machine on a server that lacks bluetooth hardware, for example
813.
by vrighter 2y ago
I do not believe it ran without errors on all cases.
814.
by vrighter 2y ago
python (as much as I personally dislike the language itself) has clean syntax for sets, dicts and arrays. Which are the data structures you use in a playbook. Ansible as python instead of yaml can be made to look very similar to current pla
815.
by vrighter 2y ago
if i memorize the book and go around making money off of reciting it, that would actually be considered an illegal reproduction. This is what llms do.
816.
by vrighter 2y ago
does it also run in less than 128 bytes of ram, with half a scanline as a "framebuffer"?
817.
by vrighter 2y ago
Only if a packrat parser is implemented, which requires a lot of memory.
818.
by vrighter 2y ago
a compiler has one requirement that llms cannot provide. It has to be robust.
819.
by vrighter 2y ago
Cos a hydrogen engine is the best way to generate electricity. Given that the entire vehicle is around the same size as the fuel tank in a pickup truck, and hydrogen's very low volumetric energy density. Make the thing, then try to s
820.
by vrighter 2y ago
Horrible framerate and it forgets anything that happened more than 0.9 seconds in the past. And they needed the actual, fully implemented game before they could begin to train it. So just, cut out the middleman, and play the game directl
821.
by vrighter 2y ago
we can't ever have LLMs reliably parse any form of data. You know what can parse it perfectly though? A parser. Which works perfectly, and consistently.
822.
by vrighter 2y ago
Played a game called Beyond a Steel Sky (sequel to the older beneath a steel sky). In the starting section there was an "engineer" going around fixing stuff. He just pointed his AI tool at the thing, and followed the instructions,
823.
by vrighter 2y ago
like pretty much every other state-sanctioned crypto experiment. Or, more subjectively, pretty much any crypto experiment, imo.
824.
by vrighter 2y ago
so it's not the same. Which means that it is not equivalent to what centos was. It's highly, but not fully, compatible. centos was "fully". You can't use it to test on the current version of rhel, where with cento
825.
by vrighter 2y ago
it doesn't even support ed25519 ssh keys
826.
by vrighter 2y ago
so it's still controlled by a single (anonymous!!!) person
827.
by vrighter 2y ago
I think a better word than orientation is "axis". They are conceptually similar to axis-angle, with some added sugar to make an algebra
828.
by vrighter 2y ago
Ah but I (usually) know when I will probably be wrong if I do give an answer, when I know I'm not familiar enough with the subject. Or if I do I will explicitly say this is an educated guess, at best. What I will not do is just spout
829.
by vrighter 2y ago
"use some clever cryptography" And who will hold the keys?
830.
by vrighter 2y ago
protect sensitive data by putting it in a high radiation environment, at high risk of micrometeorites, and where getting rid of tons of generated heat is hilariously impractical. Got it
831.
by vrighter 2y ago
so? That just means that it is not necessarily compatible with the current version of rhel deployed on our servers
832.
by vrighter 2y ago
the way I see it is that an llm esis* a markov chain. the only difference is a very long context, and a lossily compressed state transition "table".
833.
by vrighter 2y ago
i once found a renderer for quake 2 that rendered in stereograms. Managed to make it through the first level
834.
by vrighter 2y ago
eh, you get used to it. I've watched whole movies like this
835.
by vrighter 2y ago
They already failed at this. Adding something to a shopping cart is just one of the steps the mentioned example states. And consumers have already indicated that they don't trust it, because they prefer to know just what they're
836.
by vrighter 2y ago
The way I understood it, it's more similar to insertion sort, but you insert from the top instead of from the bottom of the already-sorted part.
837.
by vrighter 2y ago
Complemented by another great feature. The replacement of all "NO" buttons to "Ask me later". "Do you want me to nag you again later?" "I don't want you nagging me at all!" "No-can-do!"
838.
by vrighter 2y ago
because "being fucked with no recourse" is a key feature of cryptocurrencies
839.
by vrighter 2y ago
everything it adds is by default backwards compatible, because old programs didn't use it, because it wasn't there yet, and so won't break. Python's problem is that the non-new stuff is not always backwards compatible. I
840.
by vrighter 2y ago
I personally find python to be highly UNreadable, especially with all of its syntax and braindead scoping rules

More ›