3 ms·
If there is a single objective right answer, the model should output a probability of 1 for it, and 0 for everything else. Ex. If I ask "Is a sphere a curved ob
by vrighter 1y ago
If there is a single objective right answer, the model should output a probability of 1 for it, and 0 for everything else. Ex. If I ask "Is a sphere a curved object?" The one and only answer is "100% yes" not "I am 99% sure it is" (and once in a while actually say it isn't)
This is pretty much impossible to achieve with current architectures (which aren't all that different to those of old, just bigger). If they did, then they'd be woefully overfitted. They can't be made reliable. Anyone who understands the tech does know this.
- sailingparrot 1y ago> Anyone who understands the tech does know this Yes, and this is does not mean the technology can never be useful. I work everyday with that have false beliefs about a tech, I have a friend that until recently thought there were rivers on the moon, and some believe climate change is a hoax, I often forget things people told me and they have to tell me again. Are humans not useful at anything ?
- vrighter 1y agoIf someone responds with "no" to that question even once, then yes, I don't consider them trustworthy for anything involving complex thought.