Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
vrighter
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
3 ms
·
1.
▲
by
vrighter
6d ago
it's so they can claim to the investors that they were forced to slow downc and keep e scam going on for jus a bit longer
2.
▲
by
vrighter
7d ago
C11 is the c language version. misra C is a set of guidelines for robust code when lives are on the line. One rule is "no malloc after initialization". so no, you probably aren't. Nor should you be. misra is intended for the
3.
▲
by
vrighter
7d ago
you hit the nail right on the head!
4.
▲
by
vrighter
7d ago
"chain of thought"'s whole point is to leave future messages to themself, because they are memoryless. Just the latest marketing spin
5.
▲
by
vrighter
7d ago
they will eventually open preorders, then increase the prices for the prepaid orders, and then actually deliver the dancer in a robot suit
6.
▲
by
vrighter
7d ago
surec of course it did. "going rogue" (read: turning off all security controls) is a marketing stunt now. to convince people that the wall they're hitting doesn't exist
7.
▲
by
vrighter
7d ago
It sure did! and because those products aren't sold anymore, it's impossible to legally implement the standardc as even with the "full" spec, you need to reverse engineer stuff from unavailable software
8.
▲
by
vrighter
7d ago
performance doesn't matter.... so datacenters would be equally happy running software that runs half as fast but uses 10% more power?
9.
▲
by
vrighter
8d ago
how about requiring the format to actually be specified? Isn't ooxml filled with tons of chunks saying "and then this will behave like word 95 did" and not specify what tat is
10.
▲
by
vrighter
8d ago
it wasn't just me. And whatever problems we anticipated actually did happen. I got off that team, my colleague was stuck on it for the rest of my time there.
11.
▲
by
vrighter
8d ago
You have a car whose engine occasionally dies when left to idle. The fix for that is not to have a second car with the exact same problem give it a bit of a tow every once in a while. "very good" is the exact same level advertised
12.
▲
by
vrighter
8d ago
"Please regulate us. If you don't then the thing we're building will kill everyone!" so stop fucking building it then. Who are they trying to fool?
13.
▲
by
vrighter
8d ago
"I like for loops more than foreach" Ewwwwwwwwwwwww!!!!!! Just kidding, me too, in most cases. I only use foreach when I implement lazy iterators.
14.
▲
by
vrighter
9d ago
A separate model/classifier is just using the same broken tool to fix the broken tool. A model is not an appropriate solution.
15.
▲
by
vrighter
10d ago
If you pop in gta6 you'll have exactly no game at all!
16.
▲
by
vrighter
10d ago
Then they should say they aren't a tool to play chess and are unable. Simple. They don't.
17.
▲
by
vrighter
10d ago
how? There are no cot trajectories afaik. Each token is generated independently. "Analyzing the cot" is a natural language problem. One which we still don't know how to reliably solve. Besides throwing another defective model
18.
▲
by
vrighter
10d ago
It is simple. There aren't any explanations needed because "god is omnipotent" already covers everything. But its simplicity involves making MASSIVE assumptions. And the fact that Occam's razor explicitly says "fe
19.
▲
by
vrighter
10d ago
It doesn't matter whether you believe me or not. The work they did did get some very minor perf gains. But there was a fundamental limit due to decisions made early on (flagged, but ignored)
20.
▲
by
vrighter
10d ago
but aren't additions in exponents expensive? as in each operation is an fma
21.
▲
by
vrighter
11d ago
well not solving a-w meant that for the 8 years I worked there, a special team had to be made specifically to fix and re-solve problem x, at least 4 times, still going at it when i left
22.
▲
by
vrighter
11d ago
any code in any language in any paradigm will have unpredictable jitter on any superscalar out of order processor. Which is all of them in phones and desktops.
23.
▲
by
vrighter
11d ago
simpler is not the right word either. it's the one that makes the least assumptions, not the simplest. The simplest would be "god did it" pretty much everytime.
24.
▲
by
vrighter
12d ago
that's the point, isn't it?
25.
▲
by
vrighter
12d ago
oh no my torrent client broke out of its sandbox. Whoopsie! teeheehee
26.
▲
by
vrighter
12d ago
You gotta keep the hype up, to keep the illusion going for longer...
27.
▲
by
vrighter
15d ago
doesn't change the fact that it doesn't do what it claims to now . I just don't care about vague promises and "trust us bro" vibes that tech is sold for nowadays. It claims x, it doesn't deliver x. Maybe it co
28.
▲
by
vrighter
15d ago
wtf is a private cloud compute?
29.
▲
by
vrighter
15d ago
because we could trust the layer below. Now we can't
30.
▲
by
vrighter
15d ago
well yeah.... now you're giving it output it wasn't trained on.
More ›