vips7L

3 ms·

1.
by vips7L 5d ago
This might be dogmatic, but I genuinely don’t care. Outside of the business not caring enough to get a human to respond, I just don’t want to give money to people using LLMs. The technology is based off of theft from the working class. It’s
2.
by vips7L 6d ago
Yes.
3.
by vips7L 6d ago
This is why I’ve thought that MCP and LLM access never made sense. You’re moving your users out of your brand and out of product.
4.
by vips7L 6d ago
Not in my experience
5.
by vips7L 7d ago
Java has had plugin isolation libraries for decades.
6.
by vips7L 7d ago
Can they produce decent code at all?
7.
by vips7L 8d ago
Claude sucks.
8.
by vips7L 9d ago
sad days
9.
by vips7L 12d ago
I don’t know why anyone just blatantly copies and paste LLM output. Laziness? Anxiety about being wrong? I don’t know.
10.
by vips7L 12d ago
It’s awful. A ton of words to say absolutely nothing.
11.
by vips7L 12d ago
I’m building my own OAuth provider. I know there’s a lot of options out there but I’ve built one at work for the last 5 years and I’d like to “do it right”
12.
by vips7L 14d ago
So if Y happened (they stole it), why should we be happy about that? Why should we give them credit in the situation where they stole it? Why is that good for society?
13.
by vips7L 14d ago
It was inconsiderate and it was also stolen, just like everything else OpenAI has stolen to train their models.
14.
by vips7L 14d ago
You literally said they _stole_ the work. Why should we give credit to that?
15.
by vips7L 14d ago
It's immoral to steal someone's research. Quite sad that you don't believe that.
16.
by vips7L 14d ago
Whether you use async or blocking calls you’ll still want to keep IO at your edges otherwise you end up with tightly coupled spaghetti.
17.
by vips7L 14d ago
We should be happy that they’re stealing people’s work?
18.
by vips7L 14d ago
Why what benefit has it brought? Mass anxiety?
19.
by vips7L 17d ago
Just like using LLMs. Completely optional.
20.
A 40-year-old kernel bug discovered on the DEFCON 34 main stage(yuvalino.com)
6 points by vips7L 17d ago|1 comments
21.
by vips7L 20d ago
Pure marketing slop.
22.
by vips7L 22d ago
Dead tech
23.
by vips7L 24d ago
I’ll say it since no one else is: you don’t have to use LLMs. I still write everything by hand and I’m still shipping as fast as my coworkers.
24.
by vips7L 24d ago
Other engineering specialties are typically protected under law in many states as well.
25.
by vips7L 24d ago
I love this guy. I don't want to use this stuff either. It produces a subpar product and way lower quality than I would ever output.
26.
by vips7L 26d ago
I highly disagree. Code is still meant to be and still is read more by humans.
27.
by vips7L 26d ago
> That's because it's cheaper to automate than pay a software engineer For now. It also seems like we're still paying software engineers.
28.
by vips7L 26d ago
> Good writing requires thinking, reflection, and doing multiple passes Same with code, but that doesn't seem to matter anymore.
29.
by vips7L 26d ago
Never used it in any of the projects I’ve been on.
30.
by vips7L 26d ago
IMO it’s because LLM text doesn’t really say anything. It’s 600% more text and paragraphs for things that could be said in 1 sentence.

More ›