tyre

19 ms·

301.
by tyre 6mo ago
People I’ve spoken to in DoD strongly disagree with you there.
302.
by tyre 6mo ago
They had to negotiate away the non-profit structure of OpenAI. Sam used that as a marketing and recruiting tool, but it had outlived that and was only a problem from then on. For OAI to be a purely capitalist venture, they had to rip that o
303.
by tyre 6mo ago
Or! People understand that everyone makes mistakes and firing anyone who does only leads to people prioritizing hiding their mistakes vs. fixing them. It’s helpful, whenever you find yourself saying something like, “the only real explanatio
304.
by tyre 6mo ago
A little “bank error in your favor” sitchu. We love to see it.
305.
by tyre 6mo ago
Facebook was built before Claude Code existed.
306.
by tyre 6mo ago
I mean search engine results are pretty poor and have been for a long time. They reflect SEO, not credibility or quality. LLMs have plenty of issues, but they’re relatively clean compared with what the future will look like.
307.
by tyre 6mo ago
The issue is that these areas are optimized for—so we don’t build capacity or the surrounding infrastructure for fallbacks—and relatively small likelihood events have tremendous risk-adjusted costs. If you have one event with a 10% chance o
308.
by tyre 6mo ago
are you saying that the people trading on inside information about military operations are… producers hedging exposure?
309.
by tyre 6mo ago
I don't understand why it is a crime under current US law. Prediction markets can only do sports gambling (the vast majority of their volume) because they self-certify under the CFTC. The CFTC doesn't have the same standards of &q
310.
by tyre 6mo ago
> Since those who are predicting have to now construct their bets such that they know they can always get run over by an insider. The average person does not do this. People trade individual stocks all the time, despite every other marke
311.
by tyre 6mo ago
Another case based on interstate commerce: the US ban on racial segregation. The example given, iirc, was restaurant competition across state lines.
312.
by tyre 6mo ago
Yes, that’s fair. A friend once asked what the distinction is between authentic and genuine. This is, I think, a great example. The piece is authentic—as in, “that’s so Sam!”—but not genuine, as in, “I don’t believe he’s reflecting his inte
313.
by tyre 6mo ago
OpenAI has also repeatedly and quietly lobbied against them. You linked a vague PDF whose promised actions are: > To help sustain momentum, OpenAI is: (1) welcoming and organizing feedback through newindustrialpolicy@openai.com; (2) esta
314.
by tyre 6mo ago
The reason he's saying that is because he doesn't want you to create that structure. He wants you to not create the laws or checks & balances on him because you "trust that he doesn't really want the power". I
315.
by tyre 6mo ago
It's pretty amazing to observe people experience the past ten years in American history and continue to think that we can out-talk the bad people in the world. Michelle Obama's, "When they go low, we go high", is some of
316.
by tyre 6mo ago
The post itself is authentic in that it's a set narrative for this moment. When you see the world as Sam does, this event is a specific opportunity to humanize him. Through that lens, the humility is both performative (it is!) and nece
317.
by tyre 7mo ago
If you’re citing Matt Taibbi as a trustworthy source, man, I don’t know. He’s up there with Bari Weiss for “they’re either intentionally bad faith, stupid, or both” levels of nuance. These are not serious people.
318.
by tyre 7mo ago
From the recent New Yorker piece on Sam: “My vibes don’t match a lot of the traditional A.I.-safety stuff,” Altman said. He insisted that he continued to prioritize these matters, but when pressed for specifics he was vague: “We still will
319.
by tyre 7mo ago
how does that explain the "why would OpenAI buy them?" question? OpenAI has better relationships with every VC than these guys do. And why does OpenAI care about funding announcements, which trail actual fundraises by weeks or mon
320.
by tyre 7mo ago
I agree with you but what they're launching here is not a beautiful GUI. It's minimalist (in a bad way) and not really innovative.
321.
by tyre 7mo ago
This is a really underwhelming UI for something that is agent-first. It looks like they're mimicking Notion. The next generation of interfaces are not going to look like an evolution into minimalist text editor v250. This is like peo
322.
by tyre 7mo ago
I wish they wouldn’t call it “AI slop” before acknowledging that most of the bugs are correct. Let’s bring a bit of nuance between mindless drivel (e.g. LinkedIn influencing posts, spammed issues that are LLMs making mistakes) vs using LLMs
323.
by tyre 7mo ago
> Then about 12,000 years ago, the agricultural revolution, which probably unlocked much of the subsequent technological progress by enabling more food security and larger populations. It definitely did. Also note that agriculture was in
324.
by tyre 7mo ago
The great thing about agentic coding is you can define one whose entire role is to read a diff, look in contextual files for comments, and verify whether they’re still accurate. You don’t have to rely on humans doing it. The agent’s entire
325.
by tyre 7mo ago
To be specific, not all teardrops indicate that the person is a murderer. The teardrop is specifically in remembrance of someone else who was killed. An empty teardrop indicates the death hasn’t been avenged; a half-filled one that someone
326.
by tyre 7mo ago
Not necessarily. WSB users are trying to make it big, which means betting on long shots. This could be penny stocks, companies on the verge of bankruptcy, or ones with more sentimental value than fundamentals. Betting against these companie
327.
by tyre 7mo ago
If you read the replies to the second, you’ll see an engineer on Claude Code at Anthropic saying that it is false. Someone spread FUD on the internet, incorrectly, and now others are spreading it without verifying.
328.
by tyre 7mo ago
Now’s a good time to step away from this comment section. It seems to really be getting to you. It’s a satirical game, not representative of everyone’s (or anyone’s) full thoughts or feelings on the matter.
329.
by tyre 7mo ago
I don’t think it was in desperation but to disrespect him for his crimes
330.
by tyre 7mo ago
What is biased about this?

More ›