Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
tyre
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
14 ms
·
331.
▲
by
tyre
7mo ago
If they were using banned chips they wouldn't declare them in public papers. There have been multiple documented/alleged cases of chips being routed through Singaporean shell companies. For example: https://www.tomshard
332.
▲
by
tyre
7mo ago
Good to know it pays off. I turned it off after 45+ minutes because I was falling asleep. The world was impressive and immersive, but felt more like being on a tour than living a narrative.
333.
▲
by
tyre
7mo ago
Why do you care how much effort it took the engineer to make it? If there was a huge amount of tedium that they used Claude Code for, then reviewed and cleaned up so that it’s indistinguishable from whatever you’d expect from a human; what’
334.
▲
by
tyre
7mo ago
They could require government ID to sign up and an adult sponsor to certify accounts for kids. Plus a limit on how many accounts an adult can sponsor. It would be a mess, but solve the problem. It’s not that we don’t have the technology, we
335.
▲
by
tyre
7mo ago
As far as I’m aware, no one at United Healthcare (the monopoly that owns Change Healthcare, which was hacked for most of these) was held accountable.
336.
▲
by
tyre
7mo ago
There is a field in a claims form that indicates what type of insurance it is. One of these is CHAMPUS, which indicates that it is for a service member or their family. You can tell which. As a basic case, accumulate these (as in the CHC br
337.
▲
by
tyre
7mo ago
This wouldn’t have solved the largest one, Change Healthcare. They are an insurance claims exchange. They have to have all of this data. The breach was social engineering of a customer support rep. Having worked with them, they’re absolutel
338.
▲
by
tyre
8mo ago
Or it’s possible he was lying! If Block is really so much more efficient, while doing well, they should invest that talent into expanded products and services. But that’s not what we’re seeing. Some things: - They acquired AfterPay for $29b
339.
▲
by
tyre
8mo ago
So my cofounder was talking to Stripe about an acquihire (this was after I’d left.) As part of it, he had to do a systems design interview. He got the prompt, asked questions about throughput requirements (etc.), and said, “okay, I’d put it
340.
▲
by
tyre
8mo ago
In the US, the FDA has a Compassionate Use exemption to clinical trials for exactly this circumstance! There must be informed consent, no reasonable alternatives (which, in cases we deem terminal, is often the case), and some evidence point
341.
▲
by
tyre
8mo ago
You keep trying to say this all over these comments but this isn’t how the law works, at all. I fully understand that they are using it to ban things from the supply chain. The law, however, is not “first find the effect you want, then find
342.
▲
by
tyre
8mo ago
Okay, then imagine you overhear at a bar. Yes “anyone could have” theoretically, but not actually. In either case, you have material non-public information that your counterparty in the market does not.
343.
▲
by
tyre
8mo ago
Why are you assuming they’re an LLM? And please don’t say “em dash”. Note: you’re replying to the library’s author.
344.
▲
by
tyre
8mo ago
Prediction markets are regulated by the CFTC in the US. Your point stands, for now at least, since the CFTC seems entirely uninterested in prosecuting or regulating.
345.
▲
by
tyre
8mo ago
Yes and no. If you see prediction markets as how they were originally pitched (price ~approximating likelihood), then insider trading is good. It provides discovery. If you look at what prediction markets are today (gambling, especially on
346.
▲
by
tyre
8mo ago
> Isn't insider trading on a prediction market only wrong to the extent the insider is violating some duty of secrecy to the company? Yes. Prediction markets, for corruption reasons, are regulated by the CFTC. In commodities markets
347.
▲
by
tyre
8mo ago
Supply chain risk is not meant for this. The government isn't banning Anthropic because using it harms national security. They are banning it in retribution for Anthropic taking a stand. It's the same as Trump claiming emergency p
348.
▲
by
tyre
8mo ago
It’s pretty telling that he didn’t rule out using a Ouija board for fully autonomous military drones or mass surveillance. Real eyes..
349.
▲
by
tyre
8mo ago
This isn’t the case, sadly. Some people, like Ben Horowitz sadly, have gone completely off the deep end. Some are culture warriors who feel they have been wronged, some are opportunists. But the thing with opportunism is that this is who th
350.
▲
by
tyre
8mo ago
This is patently silly. The US does not have a democratically elected dictatorship. People and companies are free to do whatever the fuck they want that’s not illegal. They can resist any government priorities for any reason, including find
351.
▲
by
tyre
8mo ago
favorite / potato Although there are some commenters I would want to follow because they are potato. There is something so magical about some of the more delulu Take Havers around here.
352.
▲
by
tyre
8mo ago
“A source familiar with the matter” is almost certainly a company spokesperson. If they were unrelated, Anthropic wouldn’t be doing this this week because obviously everyone will conflate the two.
353.
▲
by
tyre
8mo ago
Using threes is common in English writing and speaking. It has an optimal balance of expressiveness (three marking a pattern or breadth; creating momentum) without being overwhelming. It’s not uncommon, as basic writing advice, to use sets
354.
▲
by
tyre
8mo ago
It’s interesting that they felt the need to leak this to the press.[0] Some investors or partners (or LPs, board members, etc. of those) are getting spooked by the spending plans and rightfully questioning if the return is there. Putting it
355.
▲
by
tyre
8mo ago
AFAIK none of the recent tenders have been self-funded. They’ve matched external investors who want shares with employees. Also, not sure what you mean by "tiny". It's been billions of dollars.
356.
▲
by
tyre
8mo ago
I hope they never go public (also as an ex-Stripe!) I can't really see a net-positive benefit to having public shareholders and reporting requirements. Do we think Stripe's leadership needs feedback from random investment advisors
357.
▲
Stripe called at $159B in tender offer
(cnbc.com)
2 points
by
tyre
8mo ago
|
0 comments
358.
▲
by
tyre
8mo ago
Or people don't think it's a problem! Maybe there are a ton of people who joined Bluesky because twitter devolved into a room-temperature-IQ right-wing hell hole, not because they cared about federation or whatever. Everything has
359.
▲
by
tyre
8mo ago
have you tried asking CC to build something that does it? I'm guessing it could.
360.
▲
by
tyre
8mo ago
this is the "lose money on every sale but make it up on scale" version for gamblers and I love that for you.
More ›